Menu
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 View Gallery (2)
155-235/45-70 R14-17 97 sizes 2019

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Previous Kleber Tyres Premium Touring Summer

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
84%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
73%
Wear
83%
Comfort
86%
Buy again
83%
21 Reviews
83% Average
175,700 miles driven
10 Tests (avg: 12th)
Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Comfort
86.6
0.29x / 5 tests
Wet
77.4
2x / 21 tests
Dry
75.2
1.8x / 10 tests
Value
71.4
0.38x / 17 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
82
16 tests
Handling
66.2
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 10
Publications: 3
Period: 2020 - 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 21
Avg Rating: 82.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.43
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 12/21 12 metrics
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 15/55 2 metrics
2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 12/50 12 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 13/22 12 metrics
2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 10/18 0 metrics
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 12/44 2 metrics
2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 17/20 10 metrics
2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 11/17 1 metrics
2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 14/53 2 metrics
2020 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test ACE 2020 215/55 R17 6/9 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
10
Tests
12th
Average
6th
Best
17th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
205/55 R16 • 2024
15th/55
2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
205/55 R16 • 2024
12th/21
Good aquaplaning safety, short dry braking distances, good rolling comfort.
Understeering handling, moderate tread life.
Good.
2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
205/55 R16 • 2023
12th/50
Good for the environmental balance, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency.
Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads.
Driving Safety: The driving safety of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not go beyond a satisfactory rating. It offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and could prove to be a bit more stable during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance is still classified as good, but overall it just misses out on a good rating on dry roads. On wet roads, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests, it only performed satisfactorily in the braking distance measurements and handling. It lacks a bit of grip and precision for a better rating.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Dynaxer HP4 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. The tire also scores with its low fuel consumption, but it just misses out on a good rating in terms of weight.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
165/70R14 81 T D B 68
185/60R14 82 H D B 68
175/65R14 86 T XL D B 69
185/60R14 82 T D B 68
185/70R14 88 T D B 68
175/65R14 82 T D B 68
175/65R14 82 H D B 68
165/70R14 85 T XL D B 69
15 inch
195/55R15 85 H D B 68
195/65R15 91 T C B 68
195/65R15 95 H XL C B 68
185/65R15 88 H C B 68
195/55R15 85 V D B 68
195/65R15 91 H C B 68
195/65R15 91 V C B 68
185/65R15 88 T C B 68
195/65R15 95 T XL C B 68
185/65R15 92 T XL C B 68
16 inch
205/60R16 92 H C A 68
205/60R16 92 V C A 68
215/60R16 99 V XL B A 69
215/60R16 95 V C A 68
205/55R16 94 V XL C A 69
205/60R16 96 V XL C A 69
205/55R16 91 V C A 68
205/55R16 91 H C A 68
205/60R16 96 W XL C A 69
215/60R16 99 H XL B A 69
205/55R16 94 W XL C A 69
215/60R16 95 H C A 68
205/55R16 91 W C A 68
17 inch
225/50R17 98 V XL C A 69
205/50R17 89 V C A 69
205/50R17 93 Y XL C A 69
225/50R17 94 W C A 68
205/50R17 93 W XL C A 69
225/50R17 98 Y XL C A 69
225/50R17 98 W XL C A 69
215/55R17 94 W C A 69
215/55R17 94 V C A 68
215/55R17 98 W XL C A 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 >>

Questions and Answers for the Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 16 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 highly, praising its quiet ride, comfort, and strong dry and wet grip for everyday driving, often noting excellent value. Several owners report good durability/wear over 15-40k km. A minority mention higher noise or reduced comfort, and a few note less confidence at high speeds in the wet. Overall, the Dynaxer HP4 is a well-rounded, quiet touring tyre with dependable grip and value.

Strengths
  • Low noise
  • Comfort/ride quality
  • Dry grip/handling
  • Wet grip/aquaplaning resistance
  • Value for money
  • Durability/tread wear
Areas for Improvement
  • Noise for some users
  • Reduced wet confidence at higher speeds
  • Comfort concerns on certain sizes

Top 3 Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Reviews

Given 68% while driving a Skoda Rapid TSI (185/55 R15) on mostly town for 2,200 average miles
I have 185/55R15 on 6Jx15 rims. ( People should mention size of their rims as width does play a role. )

I have driven only 3-4k km in summer and I am planning on replacing them only because I did not get the right size tires for my liking. Not enough comfort. My previous tires were same size Nokian EcoWing and they were slightly more comfortable and less noisy inside the car.

Otherwise dry and wet handling is really good for normal driving. And can handle even some more spirited driving.
Ask a question | Helpful 903
April 22, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 27,000 easy going miles
I have them for 3 years and almost 40k km. The tyre is very good on dry roads and it's very quiet. Also the wear is pretty good. But it's not the same tyre on wet roads. You have to be a little more concentrated while driving high speeds on wet roads.
Ask a question | Helpful 905
September 13, 2024
Given 91% while driving a Renault Megane (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 25,000 miles
For the first time in 41 years of driving, I searched to fit the same tyres again and in all 3 family cars of ours.They are very silent, very durable and capable in all conditions minus snow/ice. I hope Kleber goes on producing them for very long!
Ask a question | Helpful 767
September 22, 2024
Have you driven on the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Kleber Dynaxer HP4? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Kleber Dynaxer HP4 >

Latest Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Reviews

Given 60% while driving a Skoda fabia 3 hatchback (185/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Used these tyres for 2 seasons. Mostly drive in the city, but 5-10 times per season driving 200+ km on autobahns. Since my car Skoda Fabia has just 55kw i can not describe the handling quality. I even has never lost the traction on dry asphalt due to a low engine power, but while doing more agressive turn the tyre a bit "floats", but maybe it's just a feature of my fatty size. I can only compare Kleber to my older Nexen N'blue HD and they are definitely better in terms of wet grip and comfort. Wear is (i don't know) let's say OK. Overall, a nice and safe enough tyre for a more relaxed city/autobahn cruiser.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 image
Ask a question | Helpful 164
December 2, 2025
Given 60% while driving a Mitsubishi Galant sport sedan 2.0 (EA2A) (195/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Generally, it's ok tyre.
Advantages:
Comfortable ride, good dry grip, wet grip fine, driving noice pretty good.
Cons:
Wear very quickly, tyre side get very dirt accompanying with typical color. I did not use my car often but after 4 years of use I started to see a drying cracks, this is not typical for premium tyres. Mid-range tyre.
Ask a question | Helpful 838
June 25, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 53% while driving a Skoda (195/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
Thanks to you I bought these tires and I regret it. Pros: very good grip on dry and wet roads, easy assembly, zero wear, Disadvantages: Made in Indonesia and probably that's why it's very noisy, tires are not black but brown - gray, noisy = lack of comfort. I will not buy Kleber Dynaxer HP4 a second time.
Ask a question | Helpful 1009
May 12, 2023
Given 100% while driving a Renault (205/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Great value tyres. Very comfy and low noise levels. Handling in dry and wet is pretty good, really enjoying them so far. I would definitely recommend them.
Ask a question | Helpful 1002
April 14, 2023
Given 97% while driving a Skoda (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 20,000 average miles
around 15.000km the tyre is in perfect condition. Great both in wet and dry. Excelent purchase bought in 2 skoda's. fitted on citigo and also in skoda fabia 2019 1.0 tsi model 110hp
Ask a question | Helpful 917
January 9, 2023
Given 84% while driving a Suzuki Splash SZ4 (185/60 R15) on mostly town for 13,000 average miles
Excellent tyre in all conditions, minus snow and ice. V e r y silent and at a great price. Have it in my 3 family cars. I am not certain about the wear, it is still early. Otherwise, fully recomendable
Ask a question | Helpful 986
July 21, 2022
Given 87% while driving a Kia Motors Rio (195/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I am very satisfied with the tires. Mileage with them about 20,000 km. I don't drive extremely, that's why I rated their limit at 70%. Once they did well in deep water during extreme rain and storms. Their other parameters are rated at 80-90%. I drove dry and wet and always without problems. Drive carefully according to the situation! They are quiet and do not wear out significantly. I had Kumho before HP4, but HP4 are better. I would buy them again.
Ask a question | Helpful 965
April 28, 2022
Given 100% while driving a Ford Ecosport (205/60 R16) on for 10,000 spirited miles
Excellent tyres....
Ask a question | Helpful 899
February 25, 2022
Given 84% while driving a Lancia Lancia Y 1.2 (165/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Alright then, 5000 km ago I bought two of these tyres for the front on my car for €51,00 a tyre ex. fitting. Cheap in my opinion for a tyre that I read good reviews about. Also, Kléber is a sisterbrand of Michellin. I was looking for a silent tyre that also performs nicely in dry and wet. This tyre has it all! Very silent indeed and also high levels of comfort. Dry performance is excellent and wet performance is good. Driving on wet tarmac feels very safe and confident. One time I had to drive over a bridge with 80km/h while there was about 1.5cm of standing water on the tarmac. First thing I thought was: I am going to aquaplain right now! However, it didn't happen. Grip was still there! Long story short: great tyre for the price. Am buying again for real for a different car of mine. Very satisfied.
Ask a question | Helpful 739
February 20, 2022
Given 84% while driving a Toyota Corolla (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
I am driving a Toyota Corolla 1.6L , about 6000 KM, middle-eastern weather, they are so good at grabing at hor roads and also heavy rain. I like them so much and also I got them at a good price!
Ask a question | Helpful 982
January 3, 2022
Alfa Romeo (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
North Greece, d Very good dry handling and braking Very Good wet handling and braking (a bit spin on the wet if you accelerate making a turn at the start, just a sec) A very good touring tire from KLEBER 20.000 kms and still going well
Ask a question | Helpful 609
December 24, 2021
Given 90% while driving a Peugeot 308 sw 1.6 hdi (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
After 10kAfter 10000km I am very satisfied. It is amazing that such good tires can be bought for the money I gave. They behave well on both dry and wet roads. They are extremely quiet.km
Ask a question | Helpful 1128
March 5, 2021