Menu

BFGoodrich Advantage

The BFGoodrich Advantage is a summer premium touring tyre with a clear focus on everyday comfort and refinement. Real-world drivers consistently highlight its plush ride, low noise levels and reassuring wet braking for normal, sedate motoring. In independent testing it also scores well for comfort and can post respectable dry braking results, but it tends to fall back when the pace rises-especially in wet handling and overall comparative competitiveness.

8.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
72%
Wear
84%
Comfort
89%
Buy again
79%
14 Reviews
79% Average
107,112 miles driven
16 Tests (avg: 12th)
BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich Advantage

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
76.3
2x / 34 tests
Dry
73.7
1.8x / 19 tests
Comfort
72.2
0.32x / 12 tests
Value
68.7
0.42x / 24 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
80
25 tests
Handling
70.4
15 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 16
Publications: 7
Period: 2020 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 14
Avg Rating: 79.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.33
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2026 225/50 R17 10/16 8 metrics
2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test Moottori 2025 205/55 R16 2/8 5 metrics
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 23/52 2 metrics
2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 12/21 12 metrics
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 18/55 2 metrics
2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 21/50 12 metrics
2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2022 215/55 R17 9/10 8 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 9/22 12 metrics
2022 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 15 Inch ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 10/16 0 metrics
2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 18/44 2 metrics
2021 ACE / GTU Summer Tyre Test ACE 2021 225/45 R17 8/9 0 metrics
2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 11/20 10 metrics
2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test Sport Auto 2021 195/55 R16 7/11 9 metrics
2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2021 205/55 R16 9/15 1 metrics
2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 18/53 2 metrics
2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 9/12 12 metrics
16
Tests
12th
Average
2nd
Best
23rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
225/50 R17 • 2026
10th/16
BFGoodrich’s Advantage fails to achieve a good rating mainly because of poor wet performance and higher wear. Dry-road steering feedback and stability are good, but braking distances are long. On wet roads, braking, aquaplaning and handling are only fair or sufficient, leading to early under- or oversteer. Predicted mileage and efficiency are good, but abrasion is slightly elevated. ADAC therefore gives a conditional recommendation, praising the dry-road handling and high mileage but cautioning about wet-road weaknesses and above-average weight.
23rd/52
2nd/8
With an overall score of 9.0, BF Goodrich delivered impressive all-round performance. The tyre shows particularly strong handling in wet conditions and good resistance to aquaplaning, making it a safe choice for rainy weather. Its dry grip and steering feedback are also noteworthy, and it maintains good control during emergency maneuvers. The tyre offers reduced rolling resistance, helping with fuel economy. BF Goodrich's background as part of Michelin is evident in the tyre's well-rounded capabilities.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/70R14 88 T D B 69
185/60R14 82 T D B 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D B 70
175/65R14 82 H D B 69
185/60R14 82 H D B 69
165/70R14 81 T D B 69
175/65R14 86 T XL D B 70
175/65R14 82 T D B 69
185/70R14 88 T D C 69
185/60R14 82 T D C 69
165/70R14 81 T D C 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D C 70
185/60R14 82 H D C 69
175/65R14 82 T D C 69
175/65R14 86 T XL D C 70
175/65R14 82 H D C 69
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V D B 69
195/65R15 95 T XL C B 70
185/65R15 88 T C B 69
195/65R15 91 T C B 69
185/65R15 92 T XL C B 69
195/65R15 95 H XL C B 70
185/65R15 88 H C B 69
195/55R15 85 H D B 69
195/65R15 91 H C B 69
195/65R15 91 V C B 69
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C A 70
215/60R16 99 H XL C A 70
215/60R16 95 V C A 70
205/55R16 91 W C A 70
205/60R16 92 V C A 70
205/55R16 94 W XL C A 70
215/60R16 95 H C A 70
205/55R16 94 V XL C A 70
215/60R16 99 V XL C A 70
205/55R16 91 V C A 70
205/60R16 96 V XL B A 70
205/60R16 96 W XL B A 70
205/60R16 92 H C A 70
205/55R16 91 H C A 70
205/60R16 96 W XL C A 71
205/55R16 94 V XL C A 71
205/55R16 94 W XL C A 71
205/55R16 91 W C A 70
205/60R16 96 V XL C A 71
205/55R16 91 V C A 70
205/60R16 92 H C A 70
205/60R16 92 V C A 70
17 inch
225/50R17 94 W C A 70
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 70
215/55R17 94 V D A 70
215/55R17 94 W D A 70
225/45R17 94 Y XL C A 70
225/45R17 91 Y C A 70
205/50R17 93 Y XL C A 70
215/45R17 91 Y XL C A 70
205/50R17 89 V D A 70
205/50R17 93 W XL C A 70
225/45R17 91 W C A 70
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 70
225/50R17 98 V XL C A 70
215/45R17 91 V XL C A 70
215/55R17 98 W XL C A 70
225/45R17 94 W XL C A 70
225/50R17 98 W XL C A 70
225/50R17 98 Y XL C A 70
18 inch
225/40R18 92 W XL C A 70
255/35R18 94 Y XL C A 71
225/40R18 92 Y XL C A 70
245/40R18 97 Y XL C A 70
245/45R18 100 W XL C A 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 70
245/40R18 93 Y D A 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL C A 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the BFGoodrich Advantage >>

Questions and Answers for the BFGoodrich Advantage

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the BFGoodrich Advantage. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 14 user reviews

Drivers of the BFGoodrich Advantage largely praise its comfort-focused character, highlighting a plush ride, low noise, and confident wet braking/traction. Many note it suits normal and sedate driving very well, with good value and signs of strong wear life. However, multiple reviewers report average dry grip with some understeer and lack of precision when pushed, so it's not ideal for sporty driving. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with the tyre excelling in comfort and wet safety over outright performance.

Strengths
  • Ride comfort
  • Low noise/quietness
  • Wet braking and wet grip
  • Value for money
  • Durability/tread life
Areas for Improvement
  • Limited dry grip and precision at the limit
  • Understeer when pushed; not ideal for sporty driving

Top 3 BFGoodrich Advantage Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Subaru Impreza (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 41,000 spirited miles
I am reviewing my current set as i am on the verge of buying new ones, NOT because they are worn out, but just for being on the safe side... this set is extra durable on harsh summer roads, i had them for 60,000 kilometers so far.
I have them on a Subaru Impreza, which has a very low ground clearance, so i needed tough sidewalls to handle the road and not to be soft to giveaway more ground clearance on road bumps.
I had before Perelli Cinturato P7 / Continental UC6, and on overall performance the BF Advantage beats them both.
November 18, 2024
Given 82% while driving a Lexus GS460 (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
I had these fitted on December 30th and it is now January 16th, so I'm only a couple of weeks in. It is also summer here, so I haven't really been able to do much really wet road driving - so all of this is initial impressions.
Previous tyre was Michelin Pilot 5 sport - which I loved but did not go back to as they have become extremely expensive, and as a UHP tyre I only get around 18 months out of them - also I'm getting old now so don't drive as enthusiastically as I did when I was younger.
So I was looking for something more budget friendly that would last me a few years.
I have to say so far I'm very pleased - the best thing is how it has transformed the ride quality. The P5S were always quite crashy on the Lexus on poor road surfaces (which is basically everything around where I live) - the Advantage Control just soaks it all up, and makes the Lexus feel like you expect a Lexus to feel like.
They aren't a patch on the Michelins for grip, wet or dry - but they are very communicative about their limits. Also, the Michelins always felt a bit vague on centre (actually at times thought I had suspension issues) - the BFG's feel very confident on centre by comparison.
If I felt I still needed something with the best grip in the conditions I mostly drive in, I would still go with the P5S - but I'm extremely happy so far with the BFG's. I'll update in a year or two with my thoughts on wear - I've already done about 3000km on them though and they still appear new across the whole tread, front and rear.
January 15, 2025
Given 91% while driving a Audi A4 2.8 quattro (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
I've been driving the BFGoodrich advantage for around 12000 Km.
my first impressions;
very decent wet performance; excellent wet braking response; probably the best as per my driving experience.
Shining on dry pavement , the most impressive is driving comfort and the extremely quiet rolling noise.
Excellent price to quality ratio.
would highly recommend .
August 21, 2024

How would you rate the BFGoodrich Advantage?

Click a star to start your review

Latest BFGoodrich Advantage Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 79% while driving a Subaru liberty (195/60 R15) on for 3,600 miles
These tyres complement my Subaru Liberty wagon, which does regular trips of over 140 miles and across country roads. Wear has been minimal, tyres keep pressure well (always go above recommended - I hate to feel soft sidewalls or any roll in corners). Moved from Dunlop FM800 Sport for the better - these tyres match the car's performance much better than the Dunlops, but not as good as the previous Michelin XM2+. The car is taken camping so the tyres deal with extra load and dirt/gravel well, but tend to understeer when pushed with weight.
Grip for regular driving is great - but pushing limits in dry is noticeable - going around roundabout at speed produced slippage and rough feedback, so know your limits.
Very happy with this tyre, and now putting it on a Subaru Forester as well.
January 8, 2026
Given 91% while driving a Volkswagen Jetta 2.0 FSI Sport (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 19,000 spirited miles
i've been driving them for almost eight months.
had no issue at all.
Very good wet performance, shining on dry roads.
comfortable, silent.
way better than my previous tires.
would higly recommend.
February 22, 2024
Given 60% while driving a Volkswagen Passat (215/60 R16) on mostly motorways for 10,000 easy going miles
If you are easy going driver with light foot on the gas, than you will have no problem. But if you try little harder on the gas, and speed in the corners, than you'll have a problem. Car is wobbling, you fill insecure.
I try to add little more pressure in the tyre's and it's little better.
I drove 10000miles, all in dry motorways, that why I cant tell the filling on wet conditions.
I, m not satisfied with the wear also. They are quiet though.
Definitely I will not by them again.
November 27, 2023
Given 29% while driving a Ford Mondeo MK4 2.0L TCDI (140) Zetec Estate (235/40 R18) on mostly town for 6,000 spirited miles
###Do not buy this tyre###

No grip whatsoever, wheel spinning whenever I accelerate hard and not from a start, even in 3rd gear... And this is a 235 section tyre, i'll let imagine the narrower versions...

I had 205 55 16 continental premiumcontact6 in a ford focus mk2 1.8 tdci, a torque monster in low-mid rpm and it never break a sweat! Largely superior performancing tyre!

###Do not buy this tyre###
October 11, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Honda (225/55 R17) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
An alternate tyres to Michellin on my secondary car Its worth period
September 15, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Kia Motors Picanto (175/65 R14) on mostly country roads for 1,000 easy going miles
I bought these on the strength of the UK Tyrereviews website piece on 2021 Summer tyres. Even though I do not live in the UK, so far as I was able to tell, the Advantage sold here in Australia is exactly the same as the Advantage sold in the UK that was reviewed, save for one extra ply in the sidewall. I purchased these tyres on the basis of them coming top of the heap in terms of comfort in the aforementioned review. The roads where I live are appalling and getting worse by the day and it might be some time (if ever) before I can buy a large SUV such as a Santa Fe or Sorento that would obviously be far better suited to them rather than my current tiny Kia Picanto. Combine that with me not getting any younger and comfort is the main thing I want in a tyre these days, especially when seemingly all modern vehicles are biased towards firm (albeit well controlled) rides.

Well I certainly have to agree with the Tyrereviews review - these tyres are definitely much more comfortable than any previous tyres I have owned and are surprisingly quiet. It was actually their quietness that took me most by surprise since it is not exactly a feature even the manufacturer appears to excessively harp on about. But maybe they should - they really are very quiet - but not so much in terms of a reading on the dB meter - it is because the noise seems to be "tuned" into a bandwidth that we humans find far less irritable - so much less "midrange" to use a hifi analogy. Further anecdotal evidence the noise is reduced is when listening to my usual radio station at 100 kmh on coarse chip roads, I can now listen three "clicks" lower in volume than before (volume 10 versus 13 previously).

As for handling, I do detect a little bit more understeer but I fully expected this given there is no free lunch if you want to bias a tyre more towards comfort. It is a compromise that I am more than willing to live with, especially given that the handling is very progressive such that I can feel the limit gradually approaching when driving on high speed winding roads. I did find too, that whereas all my previous tyres had caused mild rear end bump steer when the rear tyres were both simultaneously travelling over the same road defect over high speed curves, this particular annoyance is thankfully totally absent with these tyres.

All in all this is a decent tyre if you are not seeking "performance" and instead are seeking something more oriented to sedate driving with a bias towards comfort. On the other hand, if you like to pretend that you are in a kart when around roundabouts or want high precision combined with neutral handling on high speed winding roads, maybe choose something else!
June 29, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Kia Motors Picanto (175/65 R14) on mostly country roads for 1,000 easy going miles
I bought these on the strength of the UK Tyrereviews website piece on 2021 Summer tyres. Even though I do not live in the UK, so far as I was able to tell, the Advantage sold here in Australia is exactly the same as the Advantage sold in the UK that was reviewed, save for one extra ply in the sidewall. I purchased these tyres on the basis of them coming top of the heap in terms of comfort in the aforementioned review. The roads where I live are appalling and getting worse by the day and it might be some time (if ever) before I can buy a large SUV such as a Santa Fe or Sorento that would obviously be far better suited to them rather than my current tiny Kia Picanto. Combine that with me not getting any younger and comfort is the main thing I want in a tyre these days, especially when seemingly all modern vehicles are biased towards firm (albeit well controlled) rides.

Well I certainly have to agree with the Tyrereviews review - these tyres are definitely much more comfortable than any previous tyres I have owned and are surprisingly quiet. It was actually their quietness that took me most by surprise since it is not exactly a feature even the manufacturer appears to excessively harp on about. But maybe they should - they really are very quiet - but not so much in terms of a reading on the dB meter - it is because the noise seems to be "tuned" into a bandwidth that we humans find far less irritable - so much less "midrange" to use a hifi analogy. Further anecdotal evidence the noise is reduced is when listening to my usual radio station at 100 kmh on coarse chip roads, I can now listen three "clicks" lower in volume than before (volume 10 versus 13 previously).

As for handling, I do detect a little bit more understeer but I fully expected this given there is no free lunch if you want to bias a tyre more towards comfort. It is a compromise that I am more than willing to live with, especially given that the handling is very progressive such that I can feel the limit gradually approaching when driving on high speed winding roads. I did find too, that whereas all my previous tyres had caused mild rear end bump steer when the rear tyres were both simultaneously travelling over the same road defect over high speed curves, this particular annoyance is thankfully totally absent with these tyres.

All in all this is a decent tyre if you are not seeking "performance" and instead are seeking something more oriented to sedate driving with a bias towards comfort. On the other hand, if you like to pretend that you are in a kart when around roundabouts or want high precision combined with neutral handling on high speed winding roads, maybe choose something else!
June 29, 2023
Given 95% while driving a Mercedes Benz B250 Petrol (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 12 spirited miles
BFgoodrich advantage, performed amazingly well on wet surfaces, very smooth handling. Way better than my previous Yoko's. Would highly recommend.
December 30, 2021
Given 93% while driving a Audi A3 1.8T sport (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Very smooth driving, performed amazingly on wet roads especially when braking. Advantage Tires performed much better than my previous BFG tires. would Highly recommend
August 27, 2021
Given 81% while driving a Ford Cmax (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
not sporty good tire for normal drive comfort is very good
February 24, 2021
Given 79% while driving a Ford (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
average dry and wet grip .better in wet dry and wet brake is really great average handling comfort is great wear seems good overall v.good tire I would recommend for normal driving
February 21, 2021
Rate the BFGoodrich Advantage