Finnish magazine Moottori tested eight mid-range summer tyres in size 205/55 R16. They ran the tyres through wet and dry braking tests, handling circuits, aquaplaning resistance, and measured noise levels and rolling resistance. The test showed clear differences in grip levels, with Nokian's Hakka Blue 3 taking the top spot over BF Goodrich Advantage DT1 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4.
Nokian emerged as the overall test winner with a score of 9.2. The tyre shows excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions, with class-leading braking distances. Particularly strong in aquaplaning resistance, the Hakka Blue 3 also delivered the best braking results on wet surfaces. The tyre remains stable and predictable in all conditions, with good steering response and minimal noise. While not the cheapest option, its balanced performance makes it an ideal choice for safety-conscious drivers.
With an overall score of 9.0, BF Goodrich delivered impressive all-round performance. The tyre shows particularly strong handling in wet conditions and good resistance to aquaplaning, making it a safe choice for rainy weather. Its dry grip and steering feedback are also noteworthy, and it maintains good control during emergency maneuvers. The tyre offers reduced rolling resistance, helping with fuel economy. BF Goodrich's background as part of Michelin is evident in the tyre's well-rounded capabilities.
Scoring 8.9 overall, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offers balanced performance with particular strengths in handling and aquaplaning resistance. In wet testing, the tyre responds quickly and precisely to steering inputs. Braking distances are good in both wet and dry conditions, though not class-leading. While the tyre performs well in most areas, its wet grip at higher speeds falls slightly behind the top performers. The Hankook offers good value with only minor compromises in performance.
With a score of 8.7, the Fulda Eco Control 2 delivers solid overall performance with an emphasis on fuel efficiency. Its wet braking distances are good, though not quite matching the best tyres in the test. The tyre handles well in most conditions but shows some limitations in aquaplaning resistance compared to top performers. Fulda, with its Goodyear heritage, offers a balanced tyre that's particularly strong in reducing rolling resistance for better fuel economy.
The Yokohama scored 8.6 overall, with its standout feature being low rolling resistance for better fuel efficiency. In fact, the test noted that its 3.3% lower rolling resistance compared to Momo could save about two liters of fuel per thousand kilometers. The tyre handles well in most conditions with decent grip levels, though it doesn't match the top performers in wet grip. Noise levels are well controlled, making it a comfortable option for everyday driving.
With a score of 8.4, the Gislaved offers solid performance, particularly in dry conditions and at moderate speeds. Its wet handling is adequate but falls behind the leaders when pushed hard. The tyre provides neutral steering characteristics and predictable behavior, making it user-friendly for everyday drivers. While not excelling in any particular area, it delivers reliable performance across a range of conditions without major weaknesses.
Scoring 8.3 overall, the Barum tyre shows good resistance to aquaplaning but struggles more with wet grip in other situations. Its dry road performance is acceptable but not remarkable. The tyre's handling becomes less precise when pushed hard in wet conditions, though it remains controllable. Manufactured in Slovakia, Barum (part of Continental) offers a budget-friendly option that makes some compromises in outright performance.
The Momo scored 8.1, coming in last among the tested tyres. While it offers good comfort and reasonable noise levels, it shows limitations in wet handling and braking distances. The tyre requires more careful handling in wet conditions, with less grip and feedback than competitors. Its strongest point is comfort, making it suitable for drivers who prioritize a smooth ride over ultimate performance. Made in Vietnam, it represents a more budget-friendly option in the test.
