Kumho Ecsta HS52

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

This tyre replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51.

Dry Grip 91%
Wet Grip 81%
Road Feedback 85%
Handling 85%
Wear 82%
Comfort 64%
Buy again 88%

Tyre review data from 10 tyre reviews averaging 82% over 72,580 miles driven.

The Ecsta HS52 is ranked 30th of 148 Summer Premium Touring tyres.

Latest Tyre Test Results

2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview - 2nd of 55 tyres

View Full Test >>

2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test - 4th of 21 tyres

  • Positive - Convincing performance on wet and dry roads, short wet and dry braking distances, affordable price.
  • Negative - Moderate rolling comfort.
  • Overall - Good.
View Full Test >>

2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 3rd of 16 tyres

  • Overall - The Kumho Ecsta HS52 earns a solid rating in driving safety, providing good steering feedback and secure handling at the limit on dry roads, complemented by a short braking distance. On wet roads, it impresses with its braking performance and wet handling, offering good grip and easy, secure maneuverability. However, its aquaplaning performance is rated as average. Overall, the Kumho receives a good rating for wet performance. In terms of environmental impact, the Kumho achieves only an average outcome. While it scores well in projected mileage and wear, its higher tyre weight results in only average efficiency. The sustainability of this tyre, produced in China/Korea, is rated as sufficient.
View Full Test >>

2024 Tyre Tests

  • 2nd: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (205/55 R16)
  • 3rd: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (215/55 R17)
  • 4th: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (205/55 R16)
  • 2023 Tyre Tests

  • 8th: 2023 Tyre Reviews Best Summer Tyres (205/55 R16)
  • 8th: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (205/55 R16)
  • 2022 Tyre Tests

  • 3rd: 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview (215/55 R17)
  • 6th: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (215/55 R17)
  • Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta HS52

    2023-03-11 - Does this tyre have Alloy Wheel Rim protection built into the sidewall?

    The size of the HS52 tyre reviews tested (205/55 R16) did not have any rim protection built into the tyre, however it might be that larger sizes of the HS52 do have rim protection. Kumho will be able to give you the best answer based on your size.

    Ask a question

    We will never publish or share your email address


    To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.

    Size Price Range  
    185/55 R15 £62.99 - £80.34 (3 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    195/50 R15 £63.68 - £68.89 (3 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    195/55 R16 £79.97 - £91.68 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    205/55 R16 £67.60 - £77.09 (3 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    205/60 R16 £106.02 - £106.02 (1 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    225/55 R16 £105.46 - £106.93 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
    Available in 30 tyre sizes - View all.

    YouTube Review

    Top 3 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Reviews

    Given 75% while driving a BMW 530D (225/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 200 spirited miles
    First of all, I'm comparing these primarily to the Kumho HM KH 31 (older HP summer tire), Bridgestone Turanza T005, Nexen N'fera SU4 and Continental WinterContact TS850P (winter), which all have been fitted to the same car before. The new Kumho Ecsta HS52 have been fitted to the car for only about 200 miles now, which were mostly windy country roads (in the dry and wet), but also a bit of motorway and town, no city driving so far. Of course, I have no idea how these will last over the long term, but I'd like to give some first impressions on this fairly new tire. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, at least in 225/55R16 for the European Market, are made in China, and this is the first set of tires out of Chinese production (that I've driven), that I would definitely buy again and recommend without doubt to everyone looking for a good set of balanced summer touring tires (on a low to mid budget) ready for some spirited interludes. All of the following statements are, of course, just my own subjective impressions and are based on a comparison with the tires mentioned above: [Dry grip] The grip in the dry, laterally und longitudinally, appears to be upper mid class. Especially laterally, the tire feels close to a HP tire, which I assume is due to the quite wide strip of positive tread on the outer edge, that most touring tire don't have to offer. [Wet grip] The grip in the wet is about mid class, which is all you could wish for at the price. However, the relation between the maximum possible lateral and longitudinal acceleration changes compared to dry grip. Now, while the lateral grip is, as mentioned, mid class, the longitudinal grip exceeds the lateral. While this phenomenon is quite common, especially among touring tires (and tuned like that on purpose by the manufacturer), on this tire, it seems to be a lot more distinct in the wet. So, this tire seems to ensure the ability to come to a sudden stop in an emergency, even when under intermediate lateral acceleration. Kamm’s friction circle mutates to a rounded rectangle, if you know what I mean, which gives you a lot of extra safety in the wet. I don’t have a lot of information about aqua planing yet, as I only found a few puddles in the last days, but so far they seem to behave well enough. All in all, wet grip is comparable neither to the wet performance of a real cheap budget tire on the low end, nor to an expensive premium tire on the top end. So, they still cannot compete with the likes of a Bridgestone or Continental here, keep that in mind. [Steering] Something, that Kumho is good on, and what I really liked about the HS52, is a quite nimble and precise feel in the steering (for a touring tire, but even compared to some HP tires at 55% HTW ratio). Every small steering input will immediately result in a change of direction, which gives you a good track guidance on the highway/motorway, and which is a real joy to cut corners with. Steering response is relatively strong, talking about lateral forces, but feedback from the road surface or potholes is neither too intense nor precise. [Lateral feel] Cornering at the limit, there is a fair amount of understeer. The warning about reaching the limits sets in in form of low frequent vibrations induced in the vehicle body, maybe also a bit in the steering column. The warning happens quite early (lateral acceleration approx. 5-6 m/s^2) and lasts until the real limits are reached. Then, the reactions are easily controllable at every time. That said, the tires still never really feel soft, and maintain a relatively high lateral stiffness (again, for a touring tire). That’s why I did not perceive the “understeer budget” the vehicle is given as annoying or disappointing, because it’s only prevalent at higher Lateral accelerations you usually don’t reach on the road, and it doesn’t feel any soft before. That might be a different case with a FWD vehicle that has more load on the front and no need for a high understeer budget. Lateral tread shift also feels to remain small, so generation of overturning torque is a very small issue here. [Longitudinal feel] On the brakes, the car always feels safe and settled. There is very low noise or vibrations on a full braking maneuver (as opposed to the vibrations when cornering), the whole chassis remains relatively quiet and calm, the tires just do their job to stop it. As for braking distances, again, subjectively these feel like upper mid class, cannot compete with specialized tires like UHP, track or rain tires, but for what they are, they didn’t disappoint me so far. Like in lateral direction, the longitudinal stiffness also appears to be quite high (for a thin-walled touring tire), so trailing arm bushings have a lot to absorb when applying the brakes, coming to a stop, or hitting bumps on the road. Especially for owners of older BMWs: Tested on a 2003 530d E39 sedan, I felt like the characteristics of these tire are as close at gets to the ones BMW tuned and adjusted the behavior of the ESC (DSC) with in these days. The same goes for the ABS. On all tires I’ve driven this car before, I never liked the tuning of the system, killing the “joy of use” by intervening a lot too early, but not hard enough if really needed, and for too long on some instances, when one axle lost traction. With the Kumho Ecsta HS52, it’s a completely different story, the control unit has a real idea about the characteristics of the tires, the inventions are on point, safe, and don’t prevent you from having some fun…. [Comfort] You could guess from the distinct stiffness in both, longitudinal and lateral direction, that these tires are not the most comfortable ones. So, also vertical stiffness is relatively high. At least, suspension comfort does not seem to be worse than on some older Kumhos, so they’re working on it. Having a really comfortable suspension of the BMW E39 sedan as a basis, I can’t complain, but would not recommend fitting these tires to a vehicle with stiffer suspension for travelling or the daily commute, unless you really want to feel the road. Noise comfort, measured subjectively, is very good, which stands opposed to the EU-label stating barely average noise comfort at 72dB. I may add, that I evaluated noise comfort not only based on straight-line rolling noise, but also based on “cornering whine” and “full braking squeal”, which both barely seem to exist on the HS52. [Miscellaneous] Tread depth on a new tire in 225/55R16 is not that much at 6,9…7,0 mm, but on par with many competitors in the segment, so lets see how long these will last. There is no sidewall or rim protection at all, but from previous incidents with older Kumhos I can tell that the sidewalls themselves are quite durable when mated with a curb even at higher speeds, so I’m optimistic about these as well….. I wasn’t able to really test rolling resistance, but judged by the speed loss when coasting and the heat they generate on the highway, it seems to be okay and the EU-label “C” could be correct (Which should be axiomatic, but I experienced some major increases of rolling resistance when tires came from different production sites/countries than originally tested for the label, especially from Asia). Fuel consumption on the long term will tell about that a bit more precisely, I hope. I do not have any experiences on reliability, wear pattern and absolute wear by now. All in all, a great mid-class tire, suited for the daily commute, touring, and even some spirited drives on country roads, that gives you anything you could ask for, given the price tag.
    Helpful 155 - tyre reviewed on April 8, 2022
    Given 64% while driving a Volvo S60 2.5T (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
    way to noisy and vibrational for me
    Helpful 27 - tyre reviewed on August 2, 2023
    Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen Golf (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
    For a 16 inch tyre it feels pretty sporty! I'm impressed with them, came from the PS3.
    Helpful 41 - tyre reviewed on October 1, 2022
    Have you driven on the Kumho Ecsta HS52 tyre?

    Have YOU got experience with the Kumho Ecsta HS52? Help millions of other tyre buyers

    Review your Kumho Ecsta HS52 >

    Latest Kumho Ecsta HS52 Reviews

    Given 81% while driving a Citroën C3 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
    Very good on dry roads, excellent handling,it isn't very comfortable but it is very safe on braking.
    Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on August 23, 2023
    Given 100% while driving a BMW 218i (205/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 35,000 easy going miles
    I'm really happy about this tyres. After changing my winter tires (Bridgestone), the difference is incredible. Dry handling and brake : Super good tyres, really impressed. Wet handling and brake : Nothing to say, they are great. Wear : Too soon to say something.
    Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on March 17, 2023
    What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
    Given 85% while driving a Kia Motors Rio (195/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,350 average miles
    After reading a few reviews about the Kumho ECSTA HS52 and considering the affordable price for the 195/55 r16 tyre size I decided to buy them. I was happilly surprised how well the car handled especially on braking in the dry and wet, very short distance to stop and very stable. Comfort was okay, not too hard over rough roads and potholes, but a bit noisy ,mostly at high speeds. Economy is good with relaxed driving I achieved around 39 mpg and with more aggressive it rose to about 30 mpg. Couldn't judge the aquaplaning because I didn't find myself facing such heavy rain and standing water. Wear is good almost no difference between the rear and front tyres( front wheel drive car) and they still have a lot of tread left. For now my experience driving on the tyres is good, I will continue to use them next season and will update after.
    Helpful 29 - tyre reviewed on November 17, 2022
    Given 89% while driving a Fiat croma (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
    Impressive summer tyre can compare performance to Nexen Su1 in 17" but I drive 16" now, Kumho make good tyres.
    Helpful 38 - tyre reviewed on September 28, 2022
    Given 80% while driving a Ford fusion (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
    It does everything I've asked it to do in daily driving in town and motorways. Tyre pressure is very sensitive to comfort, slightly higher and it becomes very uncomfortable, must always be in the sweet spot. Overall grip is fantastic and I am very happy with the purchase.
    Helpful 34 - tyre reviewed on August 20, 2022