Menu

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Replaces the Ecsta HS51

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a summer touring tyre with strong dry grip and braking, plus generally capable wet braking and handling. Aquaplaning resistance varies between tests, rolling resistance can be high, and owners' experiences of tread life are mixed.

The quick answer

Owners say 81% from 31 owner reviews 76% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 5th average finish across 8 independent tests Latest: P9 of 16 · 2026 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Dry, Wet Comfort Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated November 2026.

  • 31owner reviews
  • 305,798miles driven
  • 8professional tests

Tyre Reviews Score

Kumho Ecsta HS52

9.0/10

Better than 87% of summer tyres

  • High Confidence
  • 8 tests
  • 31 owner reviews
Scores of the 406 summer tyres we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests8 tests · 3 publications · 2022-2026 89% 86%
Owner reviews31 owner reviews · rated 81% 80% 14%
Combined 87% 9.0

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other summer tyres in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 85% 43% 8
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 89% 39% 8
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 66% 9% 6
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 22% 7% 5
EnvironmentAbrasion: the rubber a tyre sheds as it wears 61% 2% 3

Weights are shares of the test result. Owner reviews are blended in afterwards.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tyre was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 91% 8
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 74% 3

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 98% of the test figure. The other 2% comes from its predecessor, the Kumho Ecsta HS51, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

  1. 2026 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC · 225/50 R17 P9 / 16
  2. 2024 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P4 / 20
  3. 2024 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC · 215/55 R17 P3 / 16
  4. 2024 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P2 / 55
  5. 2023 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC · 205/55 R16 P8 / 50
  6. 2022 Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres Tyre Reviews · 205/55 R16 P8 / 13
Show all 8 tests
  1. 2022 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild · 215/55 R17 P6 / 21
  2. 2022 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild · 215/55 R17 P3 / 50

Tested 8 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 averages a finish of 5th.

8 Tests
0 Test Wins
5th Average
2nd Best
9th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20222026

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test P9 of 16

The updated Ecsta HS52 scores well on wet roads but only fair overall because of weak dry-road performance and increased weight. According to the summary, dry-road steering feedback and precision are merely adequate; wet grip and braking are good. Environmental performance is fair due to high abrasion and heavy weight, despite good predicted mileage and efficiency. ADAC lists short dry braking, good wet handling and good mileage as strengths, but notes deficits in dry handling, aquaplaning behaviour and slightly elevated abrasion and weight.

Weak: Fuel Consumption Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7

Every independent test of the Kumho Ecsta HS52, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20262026 ADAC Summer Tyre TestADAC · 225/50 R17P9 / 16
20242024 AutoBild Summer Tyre TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P4 / 20
20242024 ADAC Summer Tyre TestADAC · 215/55 R17P3 / 16gut (Good)
20242024 Summer Tyre Market OverviewAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P2 / 55
20232023 ADAC Summer Tyre TestADAC · 205/55 R16P8 / 50
2022Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring TyresTyre Reviews · 205/55 R16P8 / 13Tested by Tyre Reviews Recommended
20222022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre TestAuto Bild · 215/55 R17P6 / 21
20222022 Summer Tyre Market OverviewAuto Bild · 215/55 R17P3 / 50

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Videos

The Best Tires for Your Car? 13 Brands Compared and Rated!

The Best Tires for Your Car? 13 Brands Compared and Rated!

Running Costs
View Test

In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is projected to cost €15.98 per 1,000 km to buy and run - about €639 over 40,000 km - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test.

Tyre purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tyrecost per 1,000 km
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range87 sizes available

175-245Width40-65Profile14-20Rim81-104 H-YLoad/Speed Index2021First On Market

EU LabelAcross 87 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

68-72dB A/B

VersionsOE for BMW
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in the wet?
Across the 8 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stops 3% shorter than premium rivals, 5.9% shorter than mid-range rivals and 13.1% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews wet score of 85/100, and owners rate it 8.1/10 in the wet from 31 reviews.
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in the dry?
Across the 8 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stops 0.9% shorter than premium rivals, 2.9% shorter than mid-range rivals and 5.9% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews dry score of 89/100, and owners rate it 9/10 in the dry from 31 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Across the 3 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Kumho Ecsta HS52's rolling resistance is 11.1% higher than premium rivals, level with mid-range rivals and 1.7% lower than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is expected to last around 25,324 miles (40,755 km).
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Across 31 owner ratings the Kumho Ecsta HS52 averages 81%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 9 out of 10 and Comfort lowest at 7.1. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 84% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta HS52 (10)
How much does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 cost to run?
In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is projected to cost €15.98 per 1,000 km to buy and run - about €639 over 40,000 km - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test. The cheapest to run in that test is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, at €10.33.
What is the Kumho Ecsta HS52's EU tyre label rating?
Across its range, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, A for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 7.1 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 26 reviews.
How well do the Kumho Ecsta HS52 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 7.8 out of 10 for wear across 26 reviews. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta HS52 again?
76% of owners say they would buy the Kumho Ecsta HS52 again, based on the 29 owner reviews that answered the question. 52% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's dry grip?
Of the 24 owner reviews analysed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 14 mention dry grip: 13 praise it (strong dry grip) and 1 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Great tyres in wet and dry". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's tread life?
Of the 24 owner reviews analysed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 11 mention tread life: 7 praise it (long-lasting) and 4 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "They still have a lot of rubber left on them considering having driven 40k km on them". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's dry handling?
Of the 24 owner reviews analysed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 10 mention dry handling: 10 praise it (sharp dry handling) and 0 criticise it (vague dry handling). One owner wrote: "feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners". Read those reviews
What does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 replace?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is the successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51 in Kumho's range.
What sizes does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 come in?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is available in 161 sizes, ranging from 175-245/40-65 R14-20.
Owner Questions (1)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta HS52

Does this tyre have Alloy Wheel Rim protection built into the sidewall?
March 11, 2023
The size of the HS52 tyre reviews tested (205/55 R16) did not have any rim protection built into the tyre, however it might be that larger sizes of the HS52 do have rim protection. Kumho will be able to give you the best answer based on your size.

Kumho Ecsta HS52 Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say summarised from 28 reviews

Owners generally praise the Kumho Ecsta HS52 for its dry grip and handling, with many finding it direct and secure in corners. Most reviews are positive, and value for money is another frequent strength. Wet grip also earns more praise than criticism, although a few owners find it less reassuring. Tread life draws mixed views: some longer-term owners report good mileage, while others replace it relatively early. Road noise divides opinion too, with around one in eight owners finding it noisy, though more describe it as quiet.

What owners mention most counted across 24 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 31 ratings

  • Owner score 81%
  • Dry Grip 90%
  • Road Feedback 85%
  • Handling 83%
  • Wet Grip 81%
  • Wear 78%
  • Comfort 71%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 91%

“Great tires! I have been driving them now for 3rd season, dry grip feels great, not much experience on the wet grip but overall great tire considering its price range. I was kinda reserved about the Kumho brand, this is...”

  • Honda 1997 Honda Civic EJ9 1.4iS
  • 25,000 miles
Read full review → 862 found this helpful
Most critical 63%

“This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily...”

  • Volkswagen Passat B7
  • 16,000 miles
Read full review → 474 found this helpful
Longest term 100%

“I'm really happy about this tyres. After changing my winter tires (Bridgestone), the difference is incredible. Dry handling and brake : Super good tyres, really impressed. Wet handling and brake : Nothing to say, they...”

  • BMW 218i
  • 35,000 miles
Read full review → 948 found this helpful

All 26 Kumho Ecsta HS52 reviews

Score spread across 25 written reviews
74%
A Refaat
End of Life

I had Michelin primacy 4s before these Kumhos. The HS52 has very good dry grip. This is its strong point. The handling is good. But I would not call it comfortable. It feels hard when it hits a speed bumps or a pothole. It is noisy on the highway, of course it depends on how smooth the road is. But it is not quiet. It does feel stable on the highway though, feels quite planted and gives great confidence when driving.
I replaced these tyres after just over 2 years and about 18,000 km. The rubber got hard. It loses grip easily on hard acceleration at low speeds. And the braking is greatly affected as well. Especially during sudden emergency braking. This is the main reason I replaced it even though it had plenty of tread. I live in a hot and dry climate, so may be this affects the longevity of the rubber. When I bought these tyres they were not cheap at all, so I saved nothing going with Kumhos. I got them based on the great reviews I read. And the tyres are good when new. But may be would age better in a different climate.
I replaced these Kumhos with continental untracontact tyres. Which were on sale and were cheaper. The ultracontacts by comparison are quieter and much more comfortable. They absorbe the initial impact of hitting a speed bump and make it smoother. The grip is probably not as good as the Kumhos. I’m just sick of trying expensive tyres that perform poorly in a couple of years. I choose the ultracontacts as they were on sale and continental is a reputable brand.

The Kumhos rubber compound getting hand after just 2 years is not great but I got similar things happening with Michelins as well. I would still buy them if they were cheap though. Knowing that I will need to replace them after 2 years.

The included photos show the tyres after 2 years. The sidewalls look new but the tread does not look great even though it has plenty of depth.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 1
94%
Member
End of Life

Excellent tire. Reliable.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 1
68%
Zazu0801
Initial Impressions

It's a nice a comfortable and quiet tyre for road trips, and higway use. But I think lacks the peak grip both in the dry and in the wet. It loses grip quite suddenly. But if your driving far from the edge, its a really nice tyre.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 1

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Kumho Ecsta HS52? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
89%
Member
Mid-Life

Great tyres.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 2
  1. Initial Impressions81% 1,500 miles
    Very good on dry roads, excellent handling,it isn't very comfortable but it is very safe on braking.
84%
Member
End of Life

Great tyre. Like a glue in dry, decent to good in the rain. Definetely buy it again.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 8
85%
Member
End of Life

Great tyres in wet and dry . Been through a complete set in a couple of years with a bit of tread left. Sensible driving . Lasted better than my old Bridgestone turanza tyres. Great tyres for around £65 quid a tyre. . On a fresh set now with a confidence they will keep you on the road

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 12
91%
Member
Initial Impressions

Simply great tyres compared to their price. Very good dry grip (I didn’t try their wet grip as it rarely rains where I live). Road noise is noticeably low & wear is minimal.
I recommended them to my friends and they are all happy with them.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 15
94%
MonstersBG
Initial Impressions
Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).

First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 79
89%
Member
I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.

As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 342
71%
Member
I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 386
63%
Member
This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 474
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent