Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres

In this test, we'll be finding out what the best premium touring summer tyres on the market are!

I'm going to try and keep this as condensed as I possibly can as we have 13 sets of tyres in this test including the newest and best from Continental, Michelin, Hankook, Pirelli, Bridgestone, Vredestein, Kumho, Toyo, Nankang and more! This should also be the world's first test of the Continental PremiumContact 7!

So what are we testing? Premium touring tyres are also called comfort bias tyres, or normal tyres, or high performance tyres, but whatever you call them, they're the tyres most people use day to day on their normal, non sports car, vehicles. They focus on high levels of safety in the dry and wet, good levels of comfort, low noise, and low energy use to save you money at the pumps, or extend your battery range. In fact, while none of these tyres are EV specific, some of them are marked "EV ready" meaning they've been designed with both internal combustion and electric vehicles in mind.

Test Publication:

205/55 R16 13 tyres 4 categories

Similar Tests

Test Publication:

https://www.tyrereviews.com

Test Size: 205/55 R16

Tyres Tested: 13 tyres

Test Categories:
4 categories (13 tests)

Similar Tests

Wet

Wet handling is both very important, and should be where premium tyres really make the difference, and once again this has been the case.

The cheapest tyre on test, the Doublecoin, was a disaster in terms of grip and steering and feedback. The Nankang was also pretty bad, it felt ok at first, and certainly had more grip than the Doublecoin, but there was a lot more oversteer with this tyre than any other tyre. It always amazes me how much a tyre can change the balance of a vehicle, we have tyres in this group which give huge amounts of understeer, all the way to oversteer at every turn, all on a 1.5 litre basic FWD Golf!

Now those two are out of the way, everything else ranges from good to excellent for both grip and subjective handling.

The GT Radial might not have been the quickest of the group, but subjectively it was up there with lovely steering and a nice predictable balance.

In the battle of the old school midrange brands, which i think of as Falken, Kumho, Toyo, Vredestein, Vredestein was the best as it was just a tenth of the very best round the lap and had a huge grip advantage when driving, even if the handling was a little numb. It wasn't the most fun to drive though, of the three in the wet, the most fun was the Toyo.

Hankook and Bridgestone finished close on time, but felt quite different to drive. The Hankook was enjoyable and predictable, but it just picked up a bit too much mid corner understeer, but the Bridgestone wasn't really an enjoyable tyre to drive, good grip but just a lot of poorly communicated understeer mid corner. But understeer is safe, and is the balance the Michelin subscribes to too. 

Of the remaining three tyres we've not talked about, the Goodyear felt it had quite a lot of sidewall deflection on initial turn but the grip built up nicely and there was lots of grip from the front axle which made for a quick tyre. The Pirelli and the new Continental were some of the most dynamic, fun, and the fastest. 

This is particularly good news for the new Continental as the previous tyre, the PremiumContact 6 was always one of the best in the dry, but in my tests I never got on with it in the wet, so good job Continental on the new product, but also you have to be impressed by the Pirelli and Goodyear, which aren't the youngest tyres anymore but still performing very well, and of course the outstanding grip of the Vredestein.

Continental had a small lead over the Michelin and Pirelli during the wet braking tests.

The impressive Vredestein Ultrac was the best tyre in straight aquaplaning, closely followed by the Falken and Michelin. The curved aquaplaning results can be found at the bottom of the page.

Dry

Naturally dry handling isn't a key factor for these tyres, and given it's quite a short course and the Golf doesn't have a huge amount of power, the times are very close. Subjectively, there are more differences.

Each set of tyres was tested below the limit for steering response and linearity, and put through multiple aggressive lane change maneuvers to test the stability of the tyres in emergency situations, and of course around the handling lap. The good news is that apart from the Doublecoin and possibly the Nankang, all the tyres passed the lane change test with flying colors. The Doublecoin was a total mess all round, and the Nankang just had a little too much oversteer.

If we cross reference dry braking and dry handling, overall the Continental had a small grip lead in the dry, followed by Bridgestone, Kumho, Pirelli and Hankook.

As for the balance and driveability of the tyres, well that's a bit more of a tricky as a lot of them are very similar, but there are still some standouts. 

If you want a cheap 16" track day tyre the Nankang offers good grip, and while it had too much oversteer for perhaps the ideal balance on the road, it was a fun challenge on track. 

Like in the wet the GT Radial was very good dynamically, even if it couldn't match the fastest in terms of grip, and the Kumho and Pirelli were really really good all round. But, by the smallest of margins, I'm happy to report that the Continental PremiumContact 7 was once again my favorite in the dry as it had the crispest steering, the steering built up forces beautifully and it was of the tyres you really enjoyed driving.

Environment

The rolling resistance, which is how much the tyre impacts your energy or fuel use, was a huge win for the Bridgestone Turanza T005 - it was over 10% better than the next best tyre. Given how well it performed in all other categories, this is a very impressive combination of abilities. Goodyear placed second with the EfficientGrip Performance 2 living up to its name, and Toyo was third.

Noise and comfort was, as usual, very close. The budget tyre was actually the quietest on test with the lowest passby noise, but in the car it was less refined and the least comfortable of the group. While all the other tyres were incredibly close, if noise and comfort is really your thing, the Michelin Primacy 4+ or Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 have the smallest of edges over the field in my opinion.

The Doublecoin was the cheapest tyre on test and the new Continental the most expensive.

Results

1^st

Continental PremiumContact 7

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.61 kgs
• Tread: 7.5 mm

Highest level of wet grip overall, clear lead in wet braking with joint fastest wet handling, shortest dry braking and best dry handling.

Average rolling resistance, average aquaplaning resistance, increased external noise.

Once again Continental have dropped a new tyre to the market, and seriously moved the game on, most noticeably in the wet. Last year it was the SportContact 7, this year it's the PremiumContact 7.

This tyre had a huge lead in wet braking, was joint fastest around wet handling, and had the fastest wet circle lap. Thankfully, it also kept most of the dry handling character I loved of the PremiumContact 6 and was excellent on the brakes. It wasn't a flawless run, it was pretty average in aquaplaning resistance, external noise and rolling resistance, but the lead it had in the grip categories led it to a dominating win. Yes, it is the newest tyre, and yes, based on this test, its also the best.

Dry

99.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	35.27 M			100%
Dry Handling	2nd	51.73 s	51.58 s	+0.15 s	99.71%
Subj. Dry Handling	1st	100 Points			100%

Wet

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	31.58 M			100%
Wet Handling	2nd	84.85 s	84.81 s	+0.04 s	99.95%
Subj. Wet Handling	1st	100 Points			100%
Wet Circle	1st	11.5 s			100%
Straight Aqua	8th	74.91 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-5.87 Km/H	92.73%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	3.3 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.4 m/sec2	89.19%

Comfort

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	9th	92 Points	100 Points	-8 Points	92%
Noise	11th	72.2 dB	70.2 dB	+2 dB	97.23%

Value

65.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	13th	99.69	50.12	+49.57	50.28%
Rolling Resistance	8th	8.38 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.62 kg / t	80.67%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.6 kgs
• Tread: 7.3 mm

Very well balanced tyre, excellent in the dry and wet, low noise, good levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.

Average aquaplaning resistance.

The Pirelli Cinturato P7 has clearly had a significant update since I last tested it, and boy it seems to have worked. While the tyre didn't win any of the twelve categories we score on, its only real weakness was curved aquaplaning. In every other test it was within a few percent of the best, and subjectively a well balanced tyre to drive too. It's a big step forward for the Italian brand, and one I'm happy to highly recommend.

Dry

97.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	35.74 M	35.27 M	+0.47 M	98.68%
Dry Handling	8th	52.26 s	51.58 s	+0.68 s	98.7%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%

Wet

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	32.91 M	31.58 M	+1.33 M	95.96%
Wet Handling	4th	85.31 s	84.81 s	+0.5 s	99.41%
Subj. Wet Handling	1st	100 Points			100%
Wet Circle	5th	11.68 s	11.5 s	+0.18 s	98.46%
Straight Aqua	6th	75.33 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-5.45 Km/H	93.25%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	3.19 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2	86.22%

Comfort

97.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	3rd	70.4 dB	70.2 dB	+0.2 dB	99.72%

Value

71.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	7th	81.39	50.12	+31.27	61.58%
Rolling Resistance	4th	8.22 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.46 kg / t	82.24%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Bridgestone Turanza T005

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: B/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 7.7 kgs
• Tread: 7.2 mm

Ok wet grip, good aquaplaning resistance, very good dry braking, extremely low rolling resistance.

Extended wet braking, sluggish dry handling, high external noise.

The Bridgestone lost a few points for wet braking, where it was pretty average, and dry handling where it felt sluggish and down on grip of the best, but this tyre absolutely crushed the rolling resistance test, a full 15% better than the second best tyre, which was the Goodyear. IF you drive an EV or plug in hybrid, this might be the best of the group. Highly recommended.

Dry

94.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	35.29 M	35.27 M	+0.02 M	99.94%
Dry Handling	10th	52.36 s	51.58 s	+0.78 s	98.51%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	85 Points	100 Points	-15 Points	85%

Wet

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	8th	34.94 M	31.58 M	+3.36 M	90.38%
Wet Handling	6th	86.21 s	84.81 s	+1.4 s	98.38%
Subj. Wet Handling	10th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%
Wet Circle	3rd	11.6 s	11.5 s	+0.1 s	99.14%
Straight Aqua	5th	75.47 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-5.31 Km/H	93.43%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	3.33 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.37 m/sec2	90%

Comfort

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	12th	72.4 dB	70.2 dB	+2.2 dB	96.96%

Value

78.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	9th	89.19	50.12	+39.07	56.19%
Rolling Resistance	1st	6.76 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £101.99 Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: B/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.2 kgs
• Tread: 8.2 mm

Very well balanced tyre, excellent wet handling, great dry handling, low noise, good levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.

Slightly average aquaplaning resistance, extended dry braking.

The Goodyear was fantastic in both handling tests, proving to be the joint fastest tyre around wet handling. It was also quiet and comfortable, with a very low rolling resistance. highly recommended, another really well balanced tyre from Goodyear.

Dry

95.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	8th	36.31 M	35.27 M	+1.04 M	97.14%
Dry Handling	4th	51.85 s	51.58 s	+0.27 s	99.48%
Subj. Dry Handling	4th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%

Wet

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	34.34 M	31.58 M	+2.76 M	91.96%
Wet Handling	1st	84.81 s			100%
Subj. Wet Handling	5th	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Wet Circle	2nd	11.57 s	11.5 s	+0.07 s	99.39%
Straight Aqua	7th	74.98 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-5.8 Km/H	92.82%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	3.4 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.3 m/sec2	91.89%

Comfort

97.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	5th	70.8 dB	70.2 dB	+0.6 dB	99.15%

Value

70.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	12th	96.39	50.12	+46.27	52%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	7.52 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+0.76 kg / t	89.89%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £94.99 Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Michelin Primacy 4+

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.8 kgs
• Tread: 7.4 mm

Excellent wet grip with very short wet braking and good wet handling, very high aquaplaning resistance, low noise, high levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.

Sluggish dry handling with limited grip in handling and braking.

The Michelin Primacy 4+ wasn't quite as sharp as the Kumho, or any of the tyres around the dry handling lap, but it was excellent in the wet with the second best wet braking and great aquaplaning resistance. It also had a very low noise, great comfort levels and a good rolling resistance.

Dry

93.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	10th	36.58 M	35.27 M	+1.31 M	96.42%
Dry Handling	12th	52.6 s	51.58 s	+1.02 s	98.06%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	85 Points	100 Points	-15 Points	85%

Wet

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	32.88 M	31.58 M	+1.3 M	96.05%
Wet Handling	5th	85.72 s	84.81 s	+0.91 s	98.94%
Subj. Wet Handling	5th	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Wet Circle	11th	11.89 s	11.5 s	+0.39 s	96.72%
Straight Aqua	3rd	78.18 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	96.78%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	3.42 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.28 m/sec2	92.43%

Comfort

97.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	2nd	70.3 dB	70.2 dB	+0.1 dB	99.86%

Value

67.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	11th	93.89	50.12	+43.77	53.38%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.24 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.48 kg / t	82.04%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/67
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.7 kgs
• Tread: 7.5 mm

Good wet braking, excellent aquaplaning resistance, good dry handling, good levels of comfort.

Average dry braking, high rolling resistance.

The Falken Ziex ZE310 combines a very high aquaplaning resistance with good wet braking and very high levels of comfort.

Dry

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	11th	36.7 M	35.27 M	+1.43 M	96.1%
Dry Handling	5th	52.04 s	51.58 s	+0.46 s	99.12%
Subj. Dry Handling	4th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%

Wet

96.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	33.88 M	31.58 M	+2.3 M	93.21%
Wet Handling	8th	86.58 s	84.81 s	+1.77 s	97.96%
Subj. Wet Handling	5th	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Wet Circle	4th	11.65 s	11.5 s	+0.15 s	98.71%
Straight Aqua	2nd	78.92 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-1.86 Km/H	97.7%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	3.56 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.14 m/sec2	96.22%

Comfort

99%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	100 Points			100%
Noise	7th	71.6 dB	70.2 dB	+1.4 dB	98.04%

Value

66.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	10th	89.39	50.12	+39.27	56.07%
Rolling Resistance	11th	8.72 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.96 kg / t	77.52%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9 kgs
• Tread: 7 mm

Short wet braking distances, very good dry handling, short dry braking, ok rolling resistance.

Low aquaplaning resistance, high external noise.

The new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is very strong in the dry, has good wet handling and braking and reasonable rolling resistance, however it struggled in the deeper water of the aquaplaning tests and had a high external noise.

Dry

95.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	36.09 M	35.27 M	+0.82 M	97.73%
Dry Handling	3rd	51.78 s	51.58 s	+0.2 s	99.61%
Subj. Dry Handling	4th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%

Wet

91.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	34.12 M	31.58 M	+2.54 M	92.56%
Wet Handling	7th	86.47 s	84.81 s	+1.66 s	98.08%
Subj. Wet Handling	5th	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Wet Circle	8th	11.71 s	11.5 s	+0.21 s	98.21%
Straight Aqua	11th	73.6 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-7.18 Km/H	91.11%
Curved Aquaplaning	12th	2.81 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.89 m/sec2	75.95%

Comfort

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	13th	72.8 dB	70.2 dB	+2.6 dB	96.43%

Value

72.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	6th	78.5	50.12	+28.38	63.85%
Rolling Resistance	7th	8.36 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.6 kg / t	80.86%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Kumho Ecsta HS52

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9 kgs
• Tread: 7.7 mm

Very good dry handling, short dry braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance, low external noise.

Average wet grip.

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 was the fastest tyre of the group around dry handling, though the margins were so small in the dry it didn't really affect the overall result. It was also very good in dry braking, and had great aquaplaning resistance. A very impressive tyre, and it would have finished higher if it wasn't for a high rolling resistance and average wet performance.

Dry

97.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	35.9 M	35.27 M	+0.63 M	98.25%
Dry Handling	1st	51.58 s			100%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%

Wet

93.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	7th	34.36 M	31.58 M	+2.78 M	91.91%
Wet Handling	10th	87 s	84.81 s	+2.19 s	97.48%
Subj. Wet Handling	10th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%
Wet Circle	5th	11.68 s	11.5 s	+0.18 s	98.46%
Straight Aqua	4th	76.18 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-4.6 Km/H	94.31%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	3.19 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2	86.22%

Comfort

94.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	11th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%
Noise	6th	71.3 dB	70.2 dB	+1.1 dB	98.46%

Value

74.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	5th	71.8	50.12	+21.68	69.81%
Rolling Resistance	9th	8.48 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.72 kg / t	79.72%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Vredestein Ultrac

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.2 kgs
• Tread: 6.6 mm

Excellent wet handling, the best aquaplaning resistance on test, good dry braking.

High rolling resistance, high external noise.

One again the Vredestein Ultrac proves to be a wet specialist, having one of the fastest wet handling laps and amongst the best aquaplaning resistance. Unfortunately all that wet performance leaves the Vredestein a little behind the group both in dry and rolling resistance tests.

Dry

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	36.26 M	35.27 M	+0.99 M	97.27%
Dry Handling	11th	52.4 s	51.58 s	+0.82 s	98.44%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	85 Points	100 Points	-15 Points	85%

Wet

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	9th	35.29 M	31.58 M	+3.71 M	89.49%
Wet Handling	3rd	84.91 s	84.81 s	+0.1 s	99.88%
Subj. Wet Handling	1st	100 Points			100%
Wet Circle	9th	11.74 s	11.5 s	+0.24 s	97.96%
Straight Aqua	1st	80.78 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	3.7 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

96.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	10th	72 dB	70.2 dB	+1.8 dB	97.5%

Value

66.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	8th	85.59	50.12	+35.47	58.56%
Rolling Resistance	12th	9.02 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+2.26 kg / t	74.94%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Toyo Proxes Comfort

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.2 kgs
• Tread: 7.8 mm

Low noise, very low rolling resistance, good dry braking.

Extended wet braking, average dry and wet handling.

The Toyo Proxes Comfort was a fun tyre to drive in the wet, but sadly had longer wet braking distances than expected. It excelled in the rolling resistance testing, and was good in the dry.

Dry

93.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	36.15 M	35.27 M	+0.88 M	97.57%
Dry Handling	9th	52.28 s	51.58 s	+0.7 s	98.66%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	85 Points	100 Points	-15 Points	85%

Wet

93.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	10th	36.51 M	31.58 M	+4.93 M	86.5%
Wet Handling	9th	86.67 s	84.81 s	+1.86 s	97.85%
Subj. Wet Handling	1st	100 Points			100%
Wet Circle	7th	11.69 s	11.5 s	+0.19 s	98.37%
Straight Aqua	9th	74.33 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-6.45 Km/H	92.02%
Curved Aquaplaning	8th	3.28 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.42 m/sec2	88.65%

Comfort

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	9th	92 Points	100 Points	-8 Points	92%
Noise	4th	70.7 dB	70.2 dB	+0.5 dB	99.29%

Value

83.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	3rd	63.49	50.12	+13.37	78.94%
Rolling Resistance	3rd	7.69 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+0.93 kg / t	87.91%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

11^th

GT Radial FE2

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.7 kgs
• Tread: 8 mm

Good wet and dry handling with nice subjective balance, low rolling resistance.

Extended wet braking distance, average aquaplaning resistance.

The Gt Radial FE2 in eleventh was another step on from the Nankang. Once again GT have made a tyre that's enjoyable to drive, has good rolling resistance and good levels of comfort, and while it was only a few percent off in dry and wet handling, it did lose out a little in wet braking. But it was still 8 meters better than the budget.

Dry

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	9th	36.35 M	35.27 M	+1.08 M	97.03%
Dry Handling	6th	52.16 s	51.58 s	+0.58 s	98.89%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	85 Points	100 Points	-15 Points	85%

Wet

92%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	11th	38.23 M	31.58 M	+6.65 M	82.61%
Wet Handling	11th	87.27 s	84.81 s	+2.46 s	97.18%
Subj. Wet Handling	5th	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Wet Circle	12th	12.01 s	11.5 s	+0.51 s	95.75%
Straight Aqua	12th	72.92 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-7.86 Km/H	90.27%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	3.37 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.33 m/sec2	91.08%

Comfort

96.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	2nd	95 Points	100 Points	-5 Points	95%
Noise	8th	71.8 dB	70.2 dB	+1.6 dB	97.77%

Value

75.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	4th	71.15	50.12	+21.03	70.44%
Rolling Resistance	6th	8.34 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.58 kg / t	81.06%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

12^th

Nankang Econex NA1

205/55 R16 94V

• EU Label: C/B/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9.2 kgs
• Tread: 6.9 mm

Fun tyre to drive, reasonable grip during dry handling.

Low wet grip overall, long wet and dry braking distance, oversteer balance in the dry and wet which is not ideal for the road, poor aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.

The Nankang Econex NA1 was next up, considerably better than the Doublecoin but perhaps not a tyre that could be classified as great as it had long braking distances in the dry and wet, poor aquaplaning resistance, high noise and a high rolling resistance. It would however make a fun 16" dry weather track tyre if you don't want to fit a semi slick.

Dry

88.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	38.45 M	35.27 M	+3.18 M	91.73%
Dry Handling	7th	52.23 s	51.58 s	+0.65 s	98.76%
Subj. Dry Handling	12th	75 Points	100 Points	-25 Points	75%

Wet

86.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	39.61 M	31.58 M	+8.03 M	79.73%
Wet Handling	12th	89.36 s	84.81 s	+4.55 s	94.91%
Subj. Wet Handling	12th	70 Points	100 Points	-30 Points	70%
Wet Circle	10th	11.88 s	11.5 s	+0.38 s	96.8%
Straight Aqua	10th	74.13 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-6.65 Km/H	91.77%
Curved Aquaplaning	9th	3.25 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-0.45 m/sec2	87.84%

Comfort

93.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	11th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%
Noise	9th	71.9 dB	70.2 dB	+1.7 dB	97.64%

Value

79.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	2nd	58.29	50.12	+8.17	85.98%
Rolling Resistance	13th	9.18 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+2.42 kg / t	73.64%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

13^th

Double Coin DC99

205/55 R16 91V

• EU Label: C/C/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.9 kgs
• Tread: 7 mm

Low external noise.

Dangerously low levels of grip in the wet with extremely long wet braking distances, worst aquaplaning resistance, very low grip in the dry with poor balance, high rolling resistance.

In last place by a landslide was the Doublecoin DC99. If you want a tyre that is extremely quiet for the people you drive past, this is the tyre for you. For anything else, this is not the tyre as it lost every other category we tested it in, most noticeably taking 14 meters longer to stop the car from just 80kph in the wet. That means when you were stopped on the Continental, you were still doing 45kmh on the Doublecoin. Go run into a tree at 45kmh and tell me that's worth saving a bit of money on your tyres.

Dry

71.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	13th	39.62 M	35.27 M	+4.35 M	89.02%
Dry Handling	13th	53.39 s	51.58 s	+1.81 s	96.61%
Subj. Dry Handling	13th	30 Points	100 Points	-70 Points	30%

Wet

73%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	13th	46.04 M	31.58 M	+14.46 M	68.59%
Wet Handling	13th	96.27 s	84.81 s	+11.46 s	88.1%
Subj. Wet Handling	13th	50 Points	100 Points	-50 Points	50%
Wet Circle	13th	12.84 s	11.5 s	+1.34 s	89.56%
Straight Aqua	13th	64.55 Km/H	80.78 Km/H	-16.23 Km/H	79.91%
Curved Aquaplaning	13th	2.28 m/sec2	3.7 m/sec2	-1.42 m/sec2	61.62%

Comfort

95%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	11th	90 Points	100 Points	-10 Points	90%
Noise	1st	70.2 dB			100%

Value

89.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Price	1st	50.12			100%
Rolling Resistance	10th	8.63 kg / t	6.76 kg / t	+1.87 kg / t	78.33%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts