Viking Fourtech Plus vs Vredestein Quatrac
- TR Score
- 8.2/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 1
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 30
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 4 times and the Fourtech Plus not once. The Fourtech Plus held 10.6% more grip in curved aquaplaning; the Quatrac stopped 6% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Vredestein Quatrac for top-tier year-round safety, wet/snow confidence, comfort, and long tread life. Pick Viking Fourtech Plus if you prioritize upfront price and fuel efficiency, drive gently, and value strong aquaplaning resistance over ultimate dry/wet braking performance.
Where the Fourtech Plus is stronger
- Excellent curved aquaplaning resistance and good straight-line aquaplaning stability
- Low rolling resistance and best-in-test fuel use in 2024 (≈6% advantage)
- Occasional dry-handling competence (edged Quatrac once)
Where the Quatrac is stronger
- Consistently shorter braking on dry and wet (often 5-12% gains)
- Balanced, confidence-inspiring handling in wet and snow
- Lower noise/better comfort with direct steering feel
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Fourtech Plus vs Quatrac at a glance
| Category | Fourtech Plus | Gap | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 0 | 4 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac stopped 6% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 5 |
| Wet12 measurements | 3 | The Quatrac stopped 4.1% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 7 |
| Snow8 measurements | 2 | The Quatrac averaged a 3.4% higher speed on the snow handling course (2 tests) | 6 |
| Comfort3 measurements | 0 | The Quatrac was 1.5 dB quieter (2 tests) | 3 |
| Value5 measurements | 2 | 3 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.2/10 | The Quatrac by 1.3 | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating1 and 30 reviews | 84% | The Fourtech Plus by 3 points | 81% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Quatrac was dearer in 2 of 2 | +14.7% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 51 | 19 sizes made in both | 39 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Fourtech Plus | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | P21 of 30 | P2 of 30 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P11 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P10 of 37 | P5 of 37 |
Performance profile
13 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Fourtech Plus
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 4 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Fourtech Plus
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Fourtech Plus | Gap | Quatrac | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.9 | 6% | 40.33 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 93.2 | 0.3% | 93.45 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 55.38 | 4.1% | 53.18 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.3 | 4% | 79.3 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.29 | 3.3% | 13.85 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.5 | 0.3% | 76.25 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.32 | 10.6% | 3.01 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 23.65 | 1.7% | 23.25 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,055 | 0.1% | 3,058 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 75.1 | 3.4% | 77.85 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.77 | 3.3% | 3.89 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.6 | 1.5 dB | 71.1 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 41,400 | 33.2% | 55,140 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.81 | 0.9% | 7.89 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.6 | 6.3% | 4.91 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 761 | 12.1% | 669 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Fourtech Plus scores 8.2 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
| Fourtech Plus | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Dry | 79 | ||
| 78 | Wet | 96 | ||
| 30 | Comfort | 59 | ||
| 56 | Value | 55 | ||
| 61 | Snow | 66 | ||
| 26 | Ice | 93 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Fourtech Plus | Category | Quatrac | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Dry Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 8 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 7.2 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| - | Wear | 8.7 | ||
| 9 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
| 10 | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 7.2 | ||
Owners rate the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Viking Fourtech Plus
- 84%from 1 reviews
- 1,000 milesdriven by reviewers
All 1 Fourtech Plus reviewsA good all season tyre with excellent braking and grip on snow, like a winter tyre. High comfort and low noise.
Vredestein Quatrac
- 81%from 30 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 345,646 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Vredestein Quatrac is a strong all-season tyre, most often praised for excellent wet-road grip and confident performance in cold conditions, including light-to-moderate snow and ice. Many reviewers highlight strong longevity (often projecting 60-80k km) along with good comfort and generally low noise, making it a solid value alternative to pricier rivals. A minority note higher cabin noise on certain vehicles and slightly less sharp/softer dry handling (especially in hotter temperatures) compared with more summer-focused tyres.
- Excellent wet grip and confident wet braking
- Strong cold-weather performance (snow/ice capable for an all-season)
- Good longevity/treadwear and even wear reported by many
- Comfortable ride quality
- Can be noisier for some vehicles/sizes (noted by a minority)
- Dry handling/steering feel not as sporty or can feel softer in heat versus summer-oriented tyres
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 30 Quatrac reviewsFinally retired these at 55k miles. They were real good over all. Average: price and comfort. Above average: off road, snow and ice grip. Way above average: wet and dry grip. The wear was good too, if my alignment didn't go out I could've gotten about 62k out of these.
These tires went through hell and back. I took my car off road several times with these, they went through several snow storms including a couple blizzards. They never once let me down. I once got mired about 4" deep in muddy sand and was able to get out (fwd civic).
I ended up buying a new set of these. Very satisfied overall, I doubt there's another tire that has such good performance across the board without being costly. My new set was around mid $700s in total including mount, balance and disposal.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 51 sizes of the Fourtech Plus and 39 of the Quatrac, 19 of them made in both.
| Category | Fourtech Plus | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 51 sizes, 13 to 19 inch | 39 sizes, 15 to 18 inch |
| Made in both | 19 sizes 175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/50 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15195/45 R16195/55 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16and 7 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B70%C30% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C59%D41% | C69%D19%B8%A2%E2% |
| EU label noise | 71-72 dB B100% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 56 of 56 | 106 of 106 |
| On the market since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaced | - | Vredestein Quatrac 5 (2014) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Quatrac was the dearer tyre in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 14.7% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pitches the value-focused Viking Fourtech Plus against the class-leading Vredestein Quatrac-two all-season touring tyres aimed at year-round convenience but with very different priorities. Across four shared professional tests in 2024-2025, the Quatrac swept all overall victories, while the Viking carved out niche strengths that may appeal to budget-minded drivers.
The data shows the Quatrac consistently stopping shorter and handling more securely in the wet and on snow, while the Viking counters with lower fuel consumption, competitive aquaplaning resistance-especially in curves-and a sharp dry-handling showing in one test. The question becomes whether you value top-tier safety and longevity (Quatrac) or a lower purchase/operating cost profile with decent all-weather competence (Viking).
Conclusion
Vredestein's Quatrac is the clear all-rounder: four test wins, materially shorter dry and wet braking (often by 5-12%), stronger wet and snow handling, lower noise, superior comfort, and a substantial mileage advantage (circa +33% wear life in AutoBild). While rolling resistance is a touch higher, its overall value still trends better thanks to longevity and safety margins.
Viking's Fourtech Plus performs credibly for its price, with standout curved aquaplaning resistance (two category wins), occasional dry-handling strength, lower rolling resistance and fuel use, and acceptable wet/snow capability. Its main weaknesses are longer dry stopping distances and less precise dry-road behavior. For everyday, price-sensitive driving with frequent rain and moderate winter use, it's serviceable-but drivers prioritizing braking security, wet confidence, and long life should choose the Quatrac.
Fourtech Plus vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Viking Fourtech Plus or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tyre?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 4 times and the Fourtech Plus not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Fourtech Plus scores 8.2 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Fourtech Plus or the Quatrac?
The Quatrac led 7 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.1% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 5 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quatrac led 6 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 3.4% higher speed on the snow handling course across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac was 1.5 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the Fourtech Plus and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Quatrac was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 14.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Fourtech Plus is made in 51 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 19 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Fourtech Plus is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Fourtech Plus is the newer design: it reached the market in 2022, the Quatrac in 2020. The Quatrac replaced the Vredestein Quatrac 5.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-10 in 11 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac
6-5 in 11 shared tests
vs
GT-Radial ClimateActive vs Vredestein Quatrac
0-4 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion