Giti GitiSport S2+ vs Hankook Ventus Evo
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- -
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 24
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 3 times and the GitiSport S2+ not once. The Ventus Evo stopped 6% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Hankook Ventus Evo if you want the safest, most consistently top-tier max-performance summer tyre-especially if wet braking/handling confidence is a priority and you also care about wear and overall value. The Giti GitiSport S2 plus can make sense as a budget-leaning alternative when priced aggressively and when you value its strong Autobild showing (including aquaplaning results), but its wider swing in outcomes-highlighted by the poor wet performance noted in the SUV test-makes it the higher-risk pick for frequent wet-weather or heavier-vehicle use.
Where the Ventus Evo is stronger
- Best-in-class overall performance across the shared tests (wins all 3; 1st/20 Autobild and 1st/9 SUV test)
- Stronger, more repeatable braking performance in both dry and wet (e.g., dry braking 32.8 m vs 34.3-34.5 m; wet braking advantages range from marginal in Autobild to decisive in the SUV test)
- Excellent wet handling and grip balance (wins wet handling and wet circle in shared tests; described as the strongest wet performer in the SUV test)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
GitiSport S2+ vs Ventus Evo at a glance
| Category | GitiSport S2+ | Gap | Ventus Evo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 0 | 3 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 0 | The Ventus Evo stopped 4.6% shorter in the dry (3 tests) | 6 |
| Wet12 measurements | 2 | The Ventus Evo stopped 6% shorter in the wet (3 tests) | 10 |
| Off road4 measurements | 0 | 4 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 0 | The Ventus Evo was 0.6 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value4 measurements | 1 | 3 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.1/10 | The Ventus Evo by 0.3 | 9.4/10 |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Level | Level | |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 20 | 17 sizes made in both | 106 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | GitiSport S2+ | Field | Ventus Evo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | P9 of 9 | P1 of 9 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P4 of 20 | P1 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P5 of 50 | P2 of 50 |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
GitiSport S2+
Ventus Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
GitiSport S2+
Ventus Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | GitiSport S2+ | Gap | Ventus Evo | Wins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.37 | 4.6% | 32.8 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 102 | 1% | 103 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 25% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 43.27 | 6% | 39.77 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 83.2 | 3.8% | 86.35 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 8.7% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 17.95 | 3.2% | 17.31 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 89.9 | 0.3% | 89.55 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2.97 | 1.3% | 2.97 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 63 | 0.5% | 63.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 10,606 | 7.9% | 11,442 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8,296 | 2.5% | 8,501 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2,584 | 44.3% | 3,729 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 19.4% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 71.75 | 0.6 dB | 71.2 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 50,020 | 12.6% | 56,310 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8.34 | 4.3% | 7.92 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1,713 | 14.2% | 1,470 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiSport S2+ scores 9.1 and the Ventus Evo 9.4 out of 10.
| GitiSport S2+ | Category | Ventus Evo | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92 | Dry | 89 | ||
| 87 | Wet | 99 | ||
| 30 | Comfort | 50 | ||
| 33 | Value | 47 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| GitiSport S2+ | Category | Ventus Evo | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Dry Grip | 9.3 | ||
| - | Wet Grip | 9.2 | ||
| - | Road Feedback | 8.3 | ||
| - | Handling | 9 | ||
| - | Wear | 7.8 | ||
| - | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews; the GitiSport S2+ has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Giti GitiSport S2+
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Hankook Ventus Evo
- 86%from 24 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 106,316 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Evo very highly overall, with most praising strong dry and wet grip that inspires confidence. A clear majority also highlight low road noise and a comfortable, compliant ride for an everyday performance tyre. The main drawback is steering feel: around one in three owners say it lacks initial feedback or sharpness versus premium rivals, even if outright grip remains strong.
- Very strong dry grip
- Very strong wet grip
- Generally quiet at speed
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Steering feel lacks feedback/initial bite for some drivers
- Can be a bit noisy on certain surfaces or at particular speeds
- Ride can feel slightly firm on low-profile fitments
Summarised by AI from 21 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 24 Ventus Evo reviewsI bought set of these in SUV version to replace OEM worn-out Bridgestone Dueller tyres. The Hankooks were one of few options available in size for Lexus RX and the price was very good. Obviously, they are sport-biased, not intended for a comfortable relaxed SUV. Their grip both in dry and wet is perfect, steering precise. But, they are not the choice for maximum comfort and silence. Winter set (Conti 870P) in the same size are significantly quieter and more comfortable. However, these tyres are a smart choice- good price, peak safety and also good wear- after 20000km stil about 4-5mm. I would buy them again, but not for RX.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 20 sizes of the GitiSport S2+ and 106 of the Ventus Evo, 17 of them made in both.
| Category | GitiSport S2+ | Ventus Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 20 sizes, 17 to 20 inch | 106 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 17 sizes 225/45 R17225/40 R18225/45 R18235/40 R18235/45 R18245/45 R18225/35 R19225/40 R19225/45 R19235/35 R19235/40 R19245/35 R19and 5 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A100% | A97%B3% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C65%D35% | C83%A10%B7%D1% |
| EU label noise | 70-72 dB B100% | 68-73 dB B76%A24% |
| On the market since | 2025 | - |
| Replaced | - | Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 (2021) |
| Awards | - | Winner: Performance Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27) Winner: Performance Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2025) |
| Price in the shared tests | Within 1% of each other on average across the 2 tests that listed prices. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Both the Giti GitiSport S2 plus and the Hankook Ventus Evo sit in the same bracket on paper: max-performance summer tyres aimed at drivers who want sharp steering response, strong braking, and confident high-speed stability. The interesting part of this matchup is that they've faced each other across three shared 2026 tests (including a large-group Autobild test and an SUV-focused summer test), giving a clear picture of repeatable strengths rather than a one-off result.
Conclusion
Across the shared 2026 tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo is the more consistently high-performing tyre-and it converts that into results: 3 wins out of 3 shared tests, including 1st/20 in the Autobild summer test and 1st/9 in the summer SUV test. Its edge is most meaningful where it matters most for safety and confidence: braking and wet grip. For example, in the SUV test Hankook's wet braking is 50.2 m vs Giti's 60.1 m (nearly 10 metres shorter), plus stronger wet handling (89.1 vs 83.8 km/h) and better aquaplaning metrics overall in that test.
GitiSport S2+ vs Ventus Evo: your questions
Is the Giti GitiSport S2+ or the Hankook Ventus Evo the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 3 times and the GitiSport S2+ not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiSport S2+ scores 9.1 and the Ventus Evo 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the GitiSport S2+ or the Ventus Evo?
The Ventus Evo led 10 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ventus Evo led 6 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.6% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Ventus Evo was 0.6 dB quieter (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews; the GitiSport S2+ has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the two were priced within 1% of each other on average.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The GitiSport S2+ is made in 20 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Ventus Evo in 106 (17 to 22 inch). 17 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the GitiSport S2+ is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Ventus Evo A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
2-3 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
0-3 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion