Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 3 times and the AllSeasonExpert 2 not once. The AllSeasonExpert 2 was stronger in ice and comfort, the Quatrac in dry and value.
Performance profile
22 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonExpert 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonExpert 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonExpert 2
Quatrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonExpert 2 73% from 6 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | AllSeasonExpert 2 | Gap | Quatrac | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 46.74 | 12.3% | 40.96 | 0-3 |
| Dry Handling s | 77.5 | 1.6% | 76.25 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 8% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Level | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 38.07 | 0.7% | 37.66 | 1-1 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 40.8 | 2% | 40 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling s | 59.77 | 1% | 59.19 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 8% | scored | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 88.3 | 5% | 84.05 | 2-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.6 | 9.1% | 3.3 | 1-0 |
| Snow Level | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 15 | 4.8% | 15.63 | 2-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 6.01 | 1.5% | 5.92 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction N | 217.6 | = | 217.6 | 0-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 87.52 | 1.4% | 86.29 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Ice AllSeasonExpert 2 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 18.5 | 9.3% | 20.4 | 1-0 |
| Comfort AllSeasonExpert 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 3.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.4 | 0.3 dB | 71.1 | 0-1 |
| Tyre Weight kg | 8 | 2.4% | 8.2 | 1-0 |
| Value Quatrac ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 48,000 | = | 48,000 | 0-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8 | 0.1% | 8.01 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.3 | 1.9% | 5.2 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 71 | 15.5% | 60 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2020 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonExpert 2 | Field | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P13 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2023 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | P8 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test | P16 of 32 | P2 of 32 |
AllSeasonExpert 2 vs Quatrac: your questions
Is the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 3 times and the AllSeasonExpert 2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonExpert 2 scores 7.8 and the Quatrac 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonExpert 2 or the Quatrac?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 4-4 between the AllSeasonExpert 2 and the Quatrac.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 12.3% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 2-2 between the AllSeasonExpert 2 and the Quatrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.5/10 for the AllSeasonExpert 2 and 7.9/10 for the Quatrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonExpert 2 73% from 6 reviews and the Quatrac 81% from 30. 33% of AllSeasonExpert 2 owners would buy it again, against 86% for the Quatrac.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonExpert 2 is made in 69 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Quatrac in 39 (15 to 18 inch). 31 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonExpert 2 is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Quatrac is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the AllSeasonExpert 2 in 2018. The AllSeasonExpert 2 replaced the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert. The Quatrac replaced the Vredestein Quatrac 5.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

