Michelin Alpin 5 vs Nokian WR D4
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nokian WR D4 finished ahead 8 times and the Alpin 5 5 times. The Alpin 5 was stronger in wet, the WR D4 in snow.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Alpin 5
WR D4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Alpin 5
WR D4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Alpin 5
WR D4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Alpin 5 86% from 33 reviews and the WR D4 78% from 73. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Alpin 5 | Gap | WR D4 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.45 | 2.1% | 44.5 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 107.8 | 0.7% | 107 | 2-0 |
| Wet Alpin 5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 35.2 | 2.7% | 36.15 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 73.2 | 2.2% | 71.65 | 2-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 86.25 | 5.1% | 82.3 | 2-0 |
| Snow WR D4 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 28.55 | 3.2% | 27.65 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 50.9 | 1.8% | 51.8 | 1-1 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Noise dB | 70.2 | 0.7 dB | 69.55 | 1-1 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 58,350 | 52.6% | 38,288 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.83 | 14% | 7.57 | 0-2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2015 to 2018
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Alpin 5 | Field | WR D4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P11 of 20 | P9 of 20 | |
| 2018 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | P5 of 16 | P10 of 16 | |
| 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout | P17 of 52 | P14 of 52 | |
| 2017 50 Winter Tyre Shoot Out | P7 of 50 | P11 of 50 | |
| 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/65 R16 | P5 of 16 | P4 of 16 | |
| 2017 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 | P12 of 16 | P11 of 16 | |
| 2017 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| 2016 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 8 | P2 of 8 | |
| 2016 AutoBild Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P7 of 20 | |
| 2016 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P3 of 49 | P7 of 49 | |
| 2016 AZ Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | P4 of 14 | P2 of 14 | |
| 2015 ACE 17 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 8 | P4 of 8 |
Alpin 5 vs WR D4: your questions
Is the Michelin Alpin 5 or the Nokian WR D4 the better tyre?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nokian WR D4 finished ahead 8 times and the Alpin 5 5 times. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Alpin 5 scores 8.6 and the WR D4 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Alpin 5 or the WR D4?
The Alpin 5 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.7% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 2-2 between the Alpin 5 and the WR D4.
Which is better in snow?
The WR D4 led 3 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.2% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Alpin 5 lasted 52.6% longer in the wear tests (2 tests); the WR D4 had 14% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the Alpin 5 and 6.8/10 for the WR D4.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the Alpin 5 and 8.3/10 for the WR D4.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Alpin 5 86% from 33 reviews and the WR D4 78% from 73. 87% of Alpin 5 owners would buy it again, against 69% for the WR D4.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Alpin 5 is made in 17 sizes (15 to 20 inch) and the WR D4 in 32 (13 to 18 inch). 8 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Alpin 5 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the WR D4 B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The WR D4 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2015, the Alpin 5 in 2014. The Alpin 5 replaced the Michelin Alpin A4. The WR D4 replaced the Nokian WR D3.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.