Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S finished ahead 2 times and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 not once. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 was stronger in comfort and value, the Pilot Sport 4 S in dry and wet.
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 3 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 86% from 411 reviews and the Pilot Sport 4 S 85% from 180. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Gap | Pilot Sport 4 S | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Pilot Sport 4 S ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 36.6 | 3.7% | 35.25 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 101.4 | 0.4% | 101.6 | 1-1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 12.5% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Pilot Sport 4 S ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 40.25 | 2.8% | 39.1 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 82.65 | 1.6% | 81.15 | 1-1 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 14.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 72.65 | 0.2% | 72.75 | 1-1 |
| Comfort Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 11.1% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 74.1 | 0.3 dB | 74.4 | 1-1 |
| Value Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.54 | 1.8% | 9.72 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2018 to 2019
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Field | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | P3 of 8 | P2 of 8 | |
| 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | P2 of 8 | P1 of 8 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 vs Pilot Sport 4 S: your questions
Is the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S finished ahead 2 times and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 8.5 and the Pilot Sport 4 S 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or the Pilot Sport 4 S?
The Pilot Sport 4 S led 4 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.8% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Pilot Sport 4 S led 4 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.7% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 had 1.8% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 and 8/10 for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.7/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 and 8.4/10 for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 86% from 411 reviews and the Pilot Sport 4 S 85% from 180. 82% of Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 owners would buy it again, against 80% for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is made in 35 sizes (16 to 20 inch) and the Pilot Sport 4 S in 105 (17 to 22 inch). 22 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is graded A for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Pilot Sport 4 S A and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Pilot Sport 4 S in 2016. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 replaced the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The Pilot Sport 4 S replaced the Michelin Pilot Super Sport.
More comparisons with these tyres
Every Goodyear vs Michelin test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

