Giti GitiSportS2 vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Firestone Firehawk Sport finished ahead 4 times and the GitiSportS2 once. The GitiSportS2 was stronger in wet and comfort, the Firehawk Sport in dry and value.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
GitiSportS2
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
GitiSportS2
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
GitiSportS2
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the GitiSportS2 78% from 19 reviews and the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | GitiSportS2 | Gap | Firehawk Sport | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Firehawk Sport ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 36.22 | 3.4% | 34.94 | 0-5 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 110.7 | = | 110.6 | 1-2 |
| Wet GitiSportS2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 36.42 | 2.8% | 35.44 | 2-3 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 44.4 | 14.4% | 38 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 79.37 | 0.4% | 79.7 | 1-2 |
| Wet Circle (m/s) | 8.46 | 0.2% | 8.48 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 13.3 | 1.3% | 13.14 | 0-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 80.8 | 3.9% | 77.8 | 4-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.3 | 14.6% | 2.89 | 4-0 |
| Comfort GitiSportS2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.8 | 0.3 dB | 71.05 | 3-1 |
| Value Firehawk Sport ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 32,340 | 2.5% | 31,680 | 1-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.02 | 19.6% | 7.26 | 0-3 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.5 | = | 5.5 | 0-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 97.7 | 17% | 81.1 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | GitiSportS2 | Field | Firehawk Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | P17 of 20 | P20 of 20 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P15 of 18 | P7 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | P17 of 52 | P15 of 52 | |
| 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | P10 of 11 | P4 of 11 | |
| 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | P10 of 13 | P9 of 13 |
GitiSportS2 vs Firehawk Sport: your questions
Is the Giti GitiSportS2 or the Firestone Firehawk Sport the better tyre?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Firestone Firehawk Sport finished ahead 4 times and the GitiSportS2 once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiSportS2 scores 8 and the Firehawk Sport 8.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the GitiSportS2 or the Firehawk Sport?
The GitiSportS2 led 11 of the 20 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 14.6% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Firehawk Sport led 7 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.4% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Firehawk Sport had 19.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the GitiSportS2 and 5/10 for the Firehawk Sport.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the GitiSportS2 and 8/10 for the Firehawk Sport.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the GitiSportS2 78% from 19 reviews and the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6. 72% of GitiSportS2 owners would buy it again, against 67% for the Firehawk Sport.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the GitiSportS2 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 4.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The GitiSportS2 is made in 64 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Firehawk Sport in 35 (18 to 20 inch). 24 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the GitiSportS2 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Firehawk Sport A and B.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Firehawk Sport is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the GitiSportS2 in 2020. The GitiSportS2 replaced the Giti GitiSport S1. The Firehawk Sport replaced the Firestone Firehawk SZ90.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-9 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Giti GitiSportS2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
3-2 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.