Giti GitiSportS2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
The picture is nuanced: ADAC ranks the V107 much higher overall (6/18 vs. 15/18) on driving safety, yet Auto Bild's performance test shows the Giti ahead overall (17/21 vs. 19/21) thanks to strong wet aquaplaning reserves, comfort, noise, and efficiency. Mileage and price-pressure also shape value: Yokohama tends to last a bit longer but often carries higher rolling resistance and a higher purchase price.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Giti GitiSportS2 | one | |
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | four |
While it might look like the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is better than the Giti GitiSportS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Excellent straight and curved aquaplaning resistance (+8-17% advantages in ADAC)
- Low rolling resistance and better fuel consumption (e.g., 5.5 vs 5.7 l/100km)
- Lower noise and higher comfort scores in multiple tests
- Competitive pricing/value in several sizes
- Class-leading dry braking across all shared tests (e.g., 33.8 m vs 35.4 m)
- Stronger dry handling and clearer steering feedback
- Generally shorter wet braking distances in most tests
- Slightly better projected mileage and abrasion performance
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 6.82% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 2.25% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 4.36% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Wet Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 15.09% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 1.57% faster around a wet lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 was 1.43% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 floated at a 5.43% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 slipped out at a 7.58% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 scored 9.3% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during three noise tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 measured 2.09% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during three wear tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is predicted to cover 6.85% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Wear: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two value tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 proved to have a 3.69% better value based on price/1000km than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Value: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during one price tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 cost 6.48% less than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Price: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 had a 16% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 used 3.51% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Giti GitiSportS2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 emitted 2.76% less particle wear matter than the Giti GitiSportS2.
Best In Abrasion: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Giti GitiSportS2 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Giti GitiSportS2 highly for its quiet ride, comfort, strong dry and confident wet grip, and excellent value, often comparing it favorably to premium brands. A minority report issues at higher speeds or over time, including increased noise and instability, but these are outweighed by the many high-scoring reviews. Overall, the GitiSportS2 delivers premium-like performance at a budget price.
Based on 19 reviews with an average rating of 78%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 delivers strong dry grip, sharp handling, and confident wet performance when warm, with several high-scoring reviews praising its sporty feel and feedback (including on EVs). However, many note high road noise on coarse surfaces and notably fast tread wear, making it less ideal for daily comfort or longevity-focused use.
Based on 18 reviews with an average rating of 73%
Conclusion
The Giti GitiSportS2 suits drivers who see frequent rain or standing water, commute long distances, or value efficiency and comfort. It repeatedly tops straight and curved aquaplaning, runs quieter, and posts notably lower rolling resistance-often translating to lower fuel use. Its weaknesses are longer dry (and sometimes wet) braking distances and less precise handling. In short: choose Yokohama for maximum grip and confidence at speed; choose Giti for wet-security in deep water, comfort, and running-cost control.
Key Differences
- Dry braking: Yokohama consistently shorter (up to ~12% advantage in ADAC).
- Wet braking: Yokohama usually ahead, though Giti occasionally wins by small margins.
- Aquaplaning: Giti clearly superior in straight and curved tests (+9-17% in ADAC).
- Efficiency: Giti has significantly lower rolling resistance and lower fuel use.
- Comfort/Noise: Giti quieter and often better subjectively.
- Durability/Value: Yokohama slightly longer wear; Giti often cheaper but with lower mileage.
Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.