Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 vs Nokian Snowproof P
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 finished ahead 3 times and the Snowproof P not once. The Pilot Alpin 5 was stronger in dry, wet and snow, the Snowproof P in ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Pilot Alpin 5
Snowproof P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 17 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Pilot Alpin 5
Snowproof P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Pilot Alpin 5
Snowproof P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Pilot Alpin 5 87% from 34 reviews and the Snowproof P 88% from 10. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Pilot Alpin 5 | Gap | Snowproof P | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Pilot Alpin 5 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 40.95 | 2.5% | 41.97 | 3-0 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 44.8 | 1.1% | 45.31 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (km/h) | 96.7 | 0.6% | 96.1 | 1-0 |
| Wet Pilot Alpin 5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 37.66 | 3.8% | 39.34 | 3-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 36.9 | 2.1% | 37.7 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 49.8 | 2.9% | 51.31 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (km/h) | 77.3 | 0.9% | 76.6 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle (m/s) | 2.4 | 20% | 2 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 15.94 | 2.4% | 16.34 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 76.43 | 9% | 70.07 | 3-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 42.26 | 9.7% | 39.89 | 2-0 |
| Snow Pilot Alpin 5 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 16.39 | 4.3% | 17.1 | 3-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.26 | 5.2% | 5.55 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,053 | 6% | 1,959 | 2-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 86.2 | 4.3% | 90.1 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling (km/h) | 68.7 | 3.9% | 66.1 | 1-0 |
| Snow Circle s | 33.99 | 1.2% | 34.4 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 4.68 | 13.6% | 4.12 | 1-0 |
| Ice Snowproof P ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 16.3 | 1.8% | 16 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Snowproof P ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.13 | 0.1 dB | 70.03 | 1-2 |
| Value Snowproof P ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 67,000 | 29.8% | 51,600 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.81 | 10.1% | 7.94 | 0-2 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.7 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 50 | 18% | 61 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2021 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Pilot Alpin 5 | Field | Snowproof P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 31 | P8 of 31 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 10 | P9 of 10 | |
| 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 9 | P7 of 9 |
Pilot Alpin 5 vs Snowproof P: your questions
Is the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 or the Nokian Snowproof P the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 finished ahead 3 times and the Snowproof P not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Pilot Alpin 5 scores 9.5 and the Snowproof P 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Pilot Alpin 5 or the Snowproof P?
The Pilot Alpin 5 led 13 of the 13 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it resisted straight aquaplaning at a 9% higher speed across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Pilot Alpin 5 led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Pilot Alpin 5 led 10 of the 10 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.3% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Snowproof P had 10.1% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the Pilot Alpin 5 and 8.2/10 for the Snowproof P.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Pilot Alpin 5 and 8/10 for the Snowproof P.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Pilot Alpin 5 87% from 34 reviews and the Snowproof P 88% from 10. 85% of Pilot Alpin 5 owners would buy it again, against 80% for the Snowproof P.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Pilot Alpin 5 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 23.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Pilot Alpin 5 is made in 81 sizes (16 to 23 inch) and the Snowproof P in 46 (17 to 21 inch). 32 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Pilot Alpin 5 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Snowproof P B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Snowproof P is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the Pilot Alpin 5 in 2017. The Pilot Alpin 5 replaced the Michelin Pilot Alpin 4. The Snowproof P replaced the Nokian WR A4.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 18 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 21 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5-10 in 16 shared tests
vs
Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-9 in 9 shared tests
vs
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.