Menu

Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

This head-to-head pits the snow-focused touring Kleber Krisalp HP3 against the ultra-high-performance Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 across nine shared professional tests from 2020-2025. Both are winter tyres for passenger cars, but they target different priorities: Kleber emphasizes deep-winter security and value, while Michelin aims for balanced, premium performance in every condition.
Across the dataset, Michelin dominates the overall rankings (9 test wins to 0) and repeatedly leads on dry and wet braking and handling, while Kleber consistently shines in aquaplaning resistance and several snow-specific metrics. The result is a clear split between an all-rounder with class-leading refinement and longevity versus a specialist that maximizes confidence in heavy snow at a friendlier price.
Krisalp-HP3 VS Pilot-Alpin-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of nine total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5nine
nine wins

While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is better than the Kleber Krisalp HP3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Outstanding snow traction and frequent top snow braking results
  • Strong straight and curved aquaplaning resistance
  • Competitive price and solid value vs. premium rivals
  • Often quiet and stable with safe, predictable behavior in winter handling
  • Class-leading dry and wet braking and precise handling
  • Very high mileage and low wear across tests
  • Refined ride quality and low noise
  • Balanced performance on snow and ice with strong all-round safety

Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 7.17% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
45.3M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.05M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
44.1M (+2.2M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
41.9M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
45.6M (+3.3M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.3M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
44.2M (+2.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
41.4M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
47.3M (+4.7M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
42.6M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 2.3% faster around a lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
110.67Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
113.27Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
108.4Km/H (-2.1Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
110.5Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
110.2Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
112.6Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
113.4Km/H (-3.3Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
116.7Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 6.18% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
43.7M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
41M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
34.4M (+2.5M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
31.9M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
53.7M (+3.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
49.9M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
35.1M (+0.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
34.3M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
54.9M (+1.3M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
53.6M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
35M (+2.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
32.2M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
36.2M (+3M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
33.2M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
56.6M (+4.7M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
51.9M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 9.34% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
40.7M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
36.9M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
40.7M (+3.8M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
36.9M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 3.66% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
78.2Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
81.17Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
72Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
74.4Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
81.7Km/H (-4Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
85.7Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
80.9Km/H (-2.5Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
83.4Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had 7.69% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2.6m/s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.4m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2.6m/s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.4m/s (-0.2m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 floated at a 2.58% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
84.15Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
81.98Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
88.1Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
86.1Km/H (-2Km/H)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
94.7Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
91.4Km/H (-3.3Km/H)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
76.9Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
75.2Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
76.9Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
75.2Km/H (-1.7Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 slipped out at a 10.29% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2.43m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.18m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2.34m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.12m/sec2 (-0.22m/sec2)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
2.52m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.23m/sec2 (-0.29m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 stopped the vehicle in 0.33% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
24.49M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
24.57M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
24.6M (+0.3M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
24.3M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
24.6M (+0.3M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
24.3M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
29.3M (+0.1M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
29.2M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
29.3M (+0.1M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
29.2M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
9.4M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
9.4M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
27.1M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
27.8M (+0.7M)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
27.1M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
27.8M (+0.7M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had 7.73% better snow traction than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2005.75N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2173.75N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
2294N (-711N)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3005N
Kleber Krisalp HP3
2861N (-83N)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2944N
Kleber Krisalp HP3
249N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
245N (-4N)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
2619N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2501N (-118N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.5% faster around a lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
59.73Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
60.03Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
60.6Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
60.2Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
59.9Km/H (-0.7Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
60.6Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
58.7Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
59.3Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was 4.05% faster through a slalom than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
3.21m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3.08m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
3.38m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3.34m/sec2 (-0.04m/sec2)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
3.03m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.81m/sec2 (-0.22m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle 2.98% shorter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
16.8M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
16.3M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
16.8M (+0.5M)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
16.3M

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 8.22% more points than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
6.7 Points
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.3 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
6.7 Points (-0.6 Points)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.3 Points

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 measured 0.62% quieter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
69.73dB
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
69.3dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
69.7dB
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
70.1dB (+0.4dB)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
70.8dB (+0.2dB)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
70.6dB
Kleber Krisalp HP3
71.9dB (+0.4dB)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
71.5dB
Kleber Krisalp HP3
66.5dB (+1.5dB)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
65dB

Wear

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is predicted to cover 14.16% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
43679KM
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
50881.75KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
43050KM (-4920KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
47970KM
Kleber Krisalp HP3
33916KM (-7471KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
41387KM
Kleber Krisalp HP3
52700KM (-14300KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
67000KM
Kleber Krisalp HP3
45050KM (-2120KM)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
47170KM

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during three value tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 proved to have a 15.99% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
13.08Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
15.57Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
12.08Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
15.22Price/1000 (+3.14Price/1000)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
16.07Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
18.12Price/1000 (+2.05Price/1000)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
11.1Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
13.36Price/1000 (+2.26Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had a 2.67% lower rolling resistance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
8.61kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.38kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
8.67kg / t (+0.7kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.97kg / t
Kleber Krisalp HP3
8.43kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.46kg / t (+0.03kg / t)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
8.72kg / t (+0.02kg / t)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.7kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 used 1.72% less fuel than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
5.7l/100km
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5.8l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
5.7l/100km
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 emitted 21.88% less particle wear matter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

Kleber Krisalp HP3
64mg/km/t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
50mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Kleber Krisalp HP3
64mg/km/t (+14mg/km/t)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
50mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Kleber Krisalp HP3 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tyre, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.

Based on 36 reviews with an average rating of 84%

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 for delivering near-summer-tyre performance in winter, with excellent dry and wet grip, precise handling, and strong stability. Snow traction is reported as confidently good (especially on packed or light snow), and several high-scoring reviews note impressive tread life. However, multiple users caution that ice traction and braking are weaker than dedicated snow/ice tyres, and the firm sidewall can make the ride feel harsh for some. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, especially for moderate winters and performance-oriented driving.

Based on 29 reviews with an average rating of 86%

Best Review for the Kleber Krisalp HP3
Given 91% 225/60 R16 on a combination of roads for 37,000 average miles
Best tires I've ever owned, for the money. Smooth like butter and quiet for a winter tire on potholes, road cracks or rough roads. Not quiet for a winter tire but really quiet. Grip is superb, both wet and dry. Feedback is numbed by the smoothness of the tire. Handling is very good.
Helpful 1190 - tyre reviewed on June 10, 2022
View all Kleber Krisalp HP3 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Given 81% 205/60 R16 H on mostly country roads for 76,000 spirited miles
This is by far the best winter I have used. I live in the alps and use every weekend to go from 300m to 1740m ski ressort. I have needed to chain up even with 30cm snow. On the packed snow/ice no issues even from standing start on gradient. Knowing the road I push the corners and straights with the knowledge they do not let me down
Helpful 1249 - tyre reviewed on November 5, 2018
View all Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

The Pilot Alpin 5 is the benchmark all-round winter tyre here: shortest dry and wet stopping, sharper wet/dry handling, excellent comfort/quietness, and standout wear life (often 10-27% advantage), making its premium price easier to justify for mixed winter climates and high-mileage drivers. It still performs strongly on snow and ice, even when not always topping the Kleber in isolated snow disciplines.
The Krisalp HP3 delivers superb snow security and notably strong straight and curved aquaplaning resistance, plus lower purchase cost and, in some tests, slightly better fuel use. The trade-off is meaningfully longer dry/wet braking and more understeer on wet/dry roads. Choose Kleber if you drive mostly in persistent snow and slush and value price and aquaplaning safety; choose Michelin if you want the best overall safety envelope and refinement across varied winter conditions. Practical takeaway: in mixed winters, stopping distance and wear favor Michelin; in consistently snowy regions, Kleber's snow traction and aquaplaning poise are compelling.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Michelin wins all nine shared tests; Kleber records none
  • Braking: Michelin shorter in dry/wet by ~5-10% commonly; Kleber occasionally shortest on snow
  • Handling: Michelin faster and more precise on dry/wet; Kleber can understeer earlier on wet/dry
  • Aquaplaning: Kleber superior in straight and curved aquaplaning
  • Durability: Michelin wear life consistently higher (often +10-27%)
  • Value/pricing: Kleber cheaper per set and better value metrics; Michelin carries a premium price
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.