Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 finished ahead 5 times and the Winter i cept evo2 not once. The Winter Sport 5 was stronger in wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter Sport 5
Winter i cept evo2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 1 measurement recorded in only one shared test is left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Winter Sport 5
Winter i cept evo2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Winter Sport 5
Winter i cept evo2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Winter Sport 5 83% from 47 reviews and the Winter i cept evo2 80% from 28. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Winter Sport 5 | Gap | Winter i cept evo2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.5 | 1.5% | 46.2 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 113.5 | 0.7% | 114.2 | 0-2 |
| Wet Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 34.05 | 7.8% | 36.95 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 74.45 | 4.9% | 71 | 2-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 86.45 | 0.3% | 86.7 | 1-1 |
| Snow Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 27.65 | 4.5% | 28.95 | 2-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 53.55 | 2.5% | 52.25 | 2-0 |
| Comfort Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 73 | 0.4 dB | 73.4 | 2-0 |
| Value Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 35,250 | 1.1% | 34,875 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.32 | 2.2% | 8.51 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2015 to 2017
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter Sport 5 | Field | Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 20 | P20 of 20 | |
| 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P8 of 10 | |
| 2016 AutoBild Winter UHP Tyre Test | P3 of 8 | P6 of 8 | |
| 2016 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/45 R17 | P1 of 13 | P5 of 13 | |
| 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 8 | P5 of 8 |
Winter Sport 5 vs Winter i cept evo2: your questions
Is the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 or the Hankook Winter i cept evo2 the better tyre?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 finished ahead 5 times and the Winter i cept evo2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter Sport 5 scores 8.9 and the Winter i cept evo2 6.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter Sport 5 or the Winter i cept evo2?
The Winter Sport 5 led 5 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.8% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 2-2 between the Winter Sport 5 and the Winter i cept evo2.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter Sport 5 led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Winter Sport 5 had 2.2% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the Winter Sport 5 and 8.3/10 for the Winter i cept evo2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.4/10 for the Winter Sport 5 and 8.2/10 for the Winter i cept evo2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter Sport 5 83% from 47 reviews and the Winter i cept evo2 80% from 28. 83% of Winter Sport 5 owners would buy it again, against 77% for the Winter i cept evo2.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter Sport 5 is made in 49 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the Winter i cept evo2 in 80 (15 to 22 inch). 39 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter Sport 5 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter i cept evo2 C and D.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

