Menu

Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Vredestein Wintrac

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Vredestein Wintrac have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. The Winterhawk 4 was stronger in wet and snow, the Wintrac in dry, ice and value.

Performance profile

13 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.

Dry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingNoiseWearRolling Resistance

Where each is furthest ahead

Winterhawk 4

Wintrac

Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.

In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.

Every measurement, side by side

Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.

Measurement Winterhawk 4 Gap Wintrac Wins
Dry Wintrac ahead
Dry Braking m 46.87 6.4% 43.83 0-3
Dry Handling km/h 122.2 1.3% 123.7 0-2
Wet Winterhawk 4 ahead
Wet Braking m 42.54 3.6% 44.12 3-0
Wet Braking - Concrete m 38.3 3.8% 39.8 1-0
Wet Handling km/h 72.52 1.3% 73.49 0-2
Wet Circle s 12.8 1.1% 12.66 0-2
Straight Aqua km/h 84.8 4.1% 81.4 3-0
Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 3.43 9.7% 3.12 2-1
Snow Winterhawk 4 ahead
Snow Braking m 25.8 1.7% 26.24 3-2
Snow Traction N 1,837 1.4% 1,789 1-2
Snow Handling km/h 58.1 1% 57.5 2-0
Snow Slalom m/sec2 3.12 3.2% 3.22 0-1
Ice Wintrac ahead
Ice Braking m 20.4 6.4% 19.1 0-1
Comfort Level
Noise dB 70.83 0.1 dB 70.93 1-1
Value Wintrac ahead
Wear km 36,400 6% 38,800 1-2
Rolling Resistance kg / t 8.05 0.7% 7.99 0-2
Fuel Consumption l/100km 5.7 1.8% 5.6 0-1
Abrasion mg/km/t 89 30.3% 62 0-1

Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.

Head to head in 6 tests, 2021 to 2024

Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test Winterhawk 4 Field Wintrac
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild · 2024 · 205/55 R16 P18 of 20 P11 of 20
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild · 2024 · 205/55 R16 P10 of 55 P17 of 55
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test ADAC · 2023 · 205/60 R16 P7 of 16 P13 of 16
2022 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC · 2022 · 185/65 R15 P9 of 15 P5 of 15
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P10 of 20 P3 of 20
2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P5 of 50 P9 of 50

Winterhawk 4 vs Wintrac: your questions

Is the Firestone Winterhawk 4 or the Vredestein Wintrac the better tyre?

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Vredestein Wintrac have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winterhawk 4 scores 8.1 and the Wintrac 9.3 out of 10.

Which is better in the wet, the Winterhawk 4 or the Wintrac?

The Winterhawk 4 led 9 of the 16 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.6% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.

Which is better in the dry?

The Wintrac led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.4% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.

Which is better in snow?

The Winterhawk 4 led 6 of the 11 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter on snow across 5 tests.

Which lasts longer and costs less to run?

The Wintrac lasted 6% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 0.7% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the Winterhawk 4 and 8/10 for the Wintrac.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Winterhawk 4 and 8.8/10 for the Wintrac.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the Winterhawk 4 72% from 6 reviews and the Wintrac 88% from 5. 67% of Winterhawk 4 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Wintrac.

Which is more expensive?

In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Wintrac was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 10.3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.

Are they available in the same sizes?

The Winterhawk 4 is made in 83 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Wintrac in 28 (15 to 19 inch). 23 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winterhawk 4 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac B and C.

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the Winterhawk 4 Review the Wintrac

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.