BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Vredestein Wintrac
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 4 times and the Wintrac 3 times, with one level. The gForce Winter 2 was stronger in snow, the Wintrac in dry, wet, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the 8 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
gForce Winter 2
Wintrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
gForce Winter 2
Wintrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
gForce Winter 2
Wintrac
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30 reviews and the Wintrac 88% from 5. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | gForce Winter 2 | Gap | Wintrac | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Wintrac ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.65 | 4.4% | 43.63 | 0-4 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 119.4 | 0.5% | 120.1 | 1-2 |
| Wet Wintrac ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 43.23 | 2.7% | 42.05 | 0-6 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 41 | 2.9% | 39.8 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 71.4 | 2.3% | 72.99 | 0-3 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.76 | 0.8% | 12.66 | 0-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 83.03 | 2.7% | 80.85 | 4-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.22 | 7% | 3.01 | 4-0 |
| Snow gForce Winter 2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 26.15 | 4.5% | 27.3 | 5-1 |
| Snow Traction N | 1,389 | 3.8% | 1,342 | 4-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 57 | 3.2% | 55.3 | 3-0 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.3 | 2.5% | 3.22 | 1-0 |
| Ice Wintrac ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 21 | 9% | 19.1 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Wintrac ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 71.45 | 0.5 dB | 70.93 | 0-3 |
| Value Wintrac ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 38,977 | 1.1% | 38,800 | 2-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.17 | 9.8% | 8.26 | 0-3 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 1.8% | 5.6 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 56 | 9.7% | 62 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 8 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | gForce Winter 2 | Field | Wintrac |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P9 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P13 of 55 | P17 of 55 | |
| 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | P8 of 16 | P13 of 16 | |
| 2022 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | P5 of 15 | P5 of 15 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P11 of 20 | P3 of 20 | |
| 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 10 | P3 of 10 | |
| 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 16 | P3 of 16 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P7 of 50 | P9 of 50 |
gForce Winter 2 vs Wintrac: your questions
Is the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 or the Vredestein Wintrac the better tyre?
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 4 times and the Wintrac 3 times, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the gForce Winter 2 scores 8.3 and the Wintrac 9.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the gForce Winter 2 or the Wintrac?
The Wintrac led 12 of the 20 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.7% shorter in the wet across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Wintrac led 6 of the 7 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The gForce Winter 2 led 13 of the 14 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The gForce Winter 2 lasted 1.1% longer in the wear tests (3 tests); the Wintrac had 9.8% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the gForce Winter 2 and 8/10 for the Wintrac.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Wintrac was 0.5 dB quieter (4 tests). Owners rate comfort 9.2/10 for the gForce Winter 2 and 8.8/10 for the Wintrac.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30 reviews and the Wintrac 88% from 5. 100% of gForce Winter 2 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Wintrac.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the gForce Winter 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 2.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The gForce Winter 2 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Wintrac in 28 (15 to 19 inch). 21 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the gForce Winter 2 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Wintrac is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the gForce Winter 2 in 2016.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Vredestein Wintrac
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Vredestein Wintrac
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
3-14 in 17 shared tests
vs
Michelin Alpin 6 vs Vredestein Wintrac
7-2 in 10 shared tests
vs
Barum Polaris 5 vs BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
0-13 in 13 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Firestone Winterhawk 4
9-5 in 14 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.