Menu

Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Giti GitiSportS2

This head-to-head puts a max-performance benchmark, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, against a value-driven ultra-high-performance option, the Giti GitiSportS2, across six shared professional tests in 225/40 R18 and 235/35 R19. The data shows a clear split in priorities: outright grip, precision and braking versus efficiency, aquaplaning reserves and lower noise.

Across the tests, the Potenza Sport consistently finishes near the top (1st, 2nd, 3rd places), while the GitiSportS2 sits mid-pack to lower (9th-17th). Expect the Bridgestone to deliver shorter stopping distances and sharper handling on both dry and wet roads, with an unexpected advantage in tread life. The Giti counters with excellent straight and curved aquaplaning performance, lower rolling resistance and quieter operation-strengths that matter for motorway commuters and fuel-conscious drivers.
Potenza-Sport VS GitiSportS2

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Bridgestone Potenza Sportsix
six wins

While it might look like the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is better than the Giti GitiSportS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading dry and wet braking; frequent double-digit wet-braking advantage
  • Sharp, confidence-inspiring handling with high grip and precise steering
  • Significantly better wear/mileage in 2025 tests (+46-50% vs Giti), boosting value
  • Consistently high overall rankings (1st-3rd) across multiple independent tests
  • Excellent straight and curved aquaplaning resistance
  • Lower rolling resistance and better fuel consumption
  • Quieter pass-by noise than rivals in multiple tests
  • Lower purchase price in comparable sizes

Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 6.96% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
33.57M
Giti GitiSportS2
36.08M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
33.5M
Giti GitiSportS2
35.5M (+2M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
35.4M (+2.8M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
35.2M
Giti GitiSportS2
35.4M (+0.2M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
35.4M (+2.8M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.9M
Giti GitiSportS2
39.4M (+4.5M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
35.4M (+2.8M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 2.67% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
98.4s
Giti GitiSportS2
101.1s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
98.4s
Giti GitiSportS2
101.1s (+2.7s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.54% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
112.4Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
110.67Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
115.5Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
113.9Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
101.1Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
100.4Km/H (-0.7Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
120.6Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
117.7Km/H (-2.9Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 10.73% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.03M
Giti GitiSportS2
38.12M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
41.2M
Giti GitiSportS2
43.5M (+2.3M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
38.1M
Giti GitiSportS2
46.6M (+8.5M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
25.4M (+0.6M)
Giti GitiSportS2
24.8M
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
27.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
30.9M (+3.3M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
28.8M
Giti GitiSportS2
34.6M (+5.8M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
43.1M
Giti GitiSportS2
48.3M (+5.2M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 22.07% less distance than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
44.4M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.6M
Giti GitiSportS2
44.4M (+9.8M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 5.54% faster around a wet lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
66.5s
Giti GitiSportS2
70.4s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
66.5s
Giti GitiSportS2
70.4s (+3.9s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 4.41% faster around a wet lap than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
83.03Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
79.37Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86.9Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
83Km/H (-3.9Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88.7Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
84.4Km/H (-4.3Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.5Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
70.7Km/H (-2.8Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had 3.97% higher lateral wet grip than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.81m/s
Giti GitiSportS2
8.46m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.81m/s
Giti GitiSportS2
8.46m/s (-0.35m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 floated at a 2.73% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79.08Km/H
Giti GitiSportS2
81.3Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
77.8Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Giti GitiSportS2
78.6Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80.3Km/H (-3Km/H)
Giti GitiSportS2
83.3Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79.3Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Giti GitiSportS2
80.6Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
78.9Km/H (-3.7Km/H)
Giti GitiSportS2
82.6Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79.1Km/H (-2.3Km/H)
Giti GitiSportS2
81.4Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 slipped out at a 7.27% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.06m/sec2
Giti GitiSportS2
3.3m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
2.72m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)
Giti GitiSportS2
2.84m/sec2
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.38m/sec2 (-0.25m/sec2)
Giti GitiSportS2
3.63m/sec2
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.1m/sec2 (-0.3m/sec2)
Giti GitiSportS2
3.4m/sec2
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.04m/sec2 (-0.28m/sec2)
Giti GitiSportS2
3.32m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Giti GitiSportS2 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
4.3 Points
Giti GitiSportS2
4.3 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
4.3 Points
Giti GitiSportS2
4.3 Points

Noise

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 measured 2.17% quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
72dB
Giti GitiSportS2
70.44dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
69dB (+1.5dB)
Giti GitiSportS2
67.5dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
71dB (+2dB)
Giti GitiSportS2
69dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
71.6dB (+0.5dB)
Giti GitiSportS2
71.1dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.8dB (+1.8dB)
Giti GitiSportS2
72dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
74.6dB (+2dB)
Giti GitiSportS2
72.6dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is predicted to cover 32.89% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
48190KM
Giti GitiSportS2
32340KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
50500KM
Giti GitiSportS2
33600KM (-16900KM)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
45880KM
Giti GitiSportS2
31080KM (-14800KM)

Value

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two value tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport proved to have a 27.87% better value based on price/1000km than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.98Price/1000
Giti GitiSportS2
12.45Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.58Price/1000
Giti GitiSportS2
13.57Price/1000 (+3.99Price/1000)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.37Price/1000
Giti GitiSportS2
11.33Price/1000 (+2.96Price/1000)

Price

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during three price tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 cost 11.55% less than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
444.67
Giti GitiSportS2
393.33
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
460 (+60)
Giti GitiSportS2
400
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
760 (+90)
Giti GitiSportS2
670
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
114 (+4)
Giti GitiSportS2
110

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 had a 9.28% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.7kg / t
Giti GitiSportS2
8.8kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.9kg / t (+0.75kg / t)
Giti GitiSportS2
9.15kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.47kg / t (+1.35kg / t)
Giti GitiSportS2
8.12kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
10.2kg / t (+1.3kg / t)
Giti GitiSportS2
8.9kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.24kg / t (+0.22kg / t)
Giti GitiSportS2
9.02kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Giti GitiSportS2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Giti GitiSportS2 used 5.17% less fuel than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5.8l/100km
Giti GitiSportS2
5.5l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Giti GitiSportS2

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5.8l/100km (+0.3l/100km)
Giti GitiSportS2
5.5l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport emitted 34.7% less particle wear matter than the Giti GitiSportS2.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63.8mg/km/t
Giti GitiSportS2
97.7mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63.8mg/km/t
Giti GitiSportS2
97.7mg/km/t (+33.9mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Driver Reviews

Across 115 reviews, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, strong braking, and confidence-inspiring handling, often rivaling or beating PS4/PS4S and PZ4. Many note it performs best when warmed and can be superb for spirited road use, with some citing good value. The most common drawbacks are rapid tread wear, higher noise and a firm ride, noticeable grip drop when cold, and poor durability on track abuse; a few also report slightly higher fuel consumption. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused drivers, with caveats on longevity and comfort.

Based on 120 reviews with an average rating of 80%

Giti GitiSportS2 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the Giti GitiSportS2 highly for its quiet ride, comfort, strong dry and confident wet grip, and excellent value, often comparing it favorably to premium brands. A minority report issues at higher speeds or over time, including increased noise and instability, but these are outweighed by the many high-scoring reviews. Overall, the GitiSportS2 delivers premium-like performance at a budget price.

Based on 19 reviews with an average rating of 78%

Best Review for the Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Given 81% 225/45 R17 on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I have had these on the rear of my XFR for a few months now, it has the optional "R-S" size of 295/30/20. They get a hard life on a heavy >500bhp RWD car with quite relaxed electronics, and these are by far the best tyres I have used on the rear of an XFR - various models of which have been my daily driver for 6.5 years now (about 90k miles covered in that time). Traction is superb in wet and dry conditions, and resistance to aquaplaning has been good as well. It is slightly concerning they come with
Helpful 2774 - tyre reviewed on November 22, 2021
View all Bridgestone Potenza Sport driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Giti GitiSportS2
Given 89% 235/40 R19 on mostly motorways for 10,000 spirited miles
Replaced the original Primacy 4 VOL with this set of new Gitis. So far very happy with the choice. Very comfortable and quite tyres, no noticeable difference with the Michelin. Dry handling gives confidence and even in heavy rain the tyre seems to well. The only negative point would be that the rim protector seems quite small and don't think it would do a good job. All things considered, and especially the low price point, these are a great choice and value for money! Recommended!
Helpful 1049 - tyre reviewed on April 30, 2022
View all Giti GitiSportS2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

The pattern is decisive: the Bridgestone Potenza Sport dominates dynamic safety and control. It wins every dry braking comparison (often by 5-11%) and most wet categories, including several double-digit gaps in wet braking (e.g., +16.8% in ADAC; +18.2% in AZ). Handling precision and feedback repeatedly earn it top marks, and 2025 testing shows a major step in durability-roughly 46-50% more projected mileage than the Giti-making its real-world value stronger than expected for a max-performance tyre.

The Giti GitiSportS2 is the more efficient and tranquil choice. It repeatedly tops aquaplaning (straight and curved), runs quieter, and posts lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption (e.g., 5.5 vs 5.8 l/100 km in ADAC). However, its longer braking distances-especially in the wet and on concrete-and less precise handling limit its appeal for enthusiastic driving or safety-maximizing buyers.

If you prioritize stopping distance, grip reserve and steering accuracy, the Potenza Sport is the clear pick and, given its improved wear and strong value scores in 2025 tests, it now makes financial sense too. If your priorities are motorway stability in heavy standing water, lower cabin noise and better efficiency at a lower purchase price, the GitiSportS2 fits-but accept the braking and wet-grip compromises.
Key Differences
  • Braking performance: Potenza Sport stops shorter in all dry tests and most wet tests (often 7-18% shorter).
  • Handling/precision: Bridgestone offers crisper turn-in and higher cornering speeds; Giti feels less precise, especially in the wet.
  • Aquaplaning: Giti leads straight and curved aquaplaning, adding security in deep standing water.
  • Efficiency: Giti shows lower rolling resistance and fuel use; Bridgestone trades efficiency for grip.
  • Noise/comfort: Giti is quieter in most measurements; Bridgestone is average for comfort.
  • Durability/value: 2025 results show Bridgestone with much longer mileage and better value scores despite a higher price point.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Overall Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.