Menu

Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro

In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.

The good news is that both the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Vredestein Ultrac Pro are Max Performance Summer tyres designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tyres is relatively simple.

Both tyres are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tyre tests.

Potenza-Sport VS Ultrac-Pro

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of seven total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Bridgestone Potenza Sportsix
six wins
Vredestein Ultrac Proone
one wins

While it might look like the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is better than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during seven dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 6.21% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
33.69M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.92M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
37M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
39.1M (+2.1M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.1M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.1M (+3M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+2.4M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
33M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+2M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.9M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36.6M (+1.7M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
32.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35M (+2.4M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
33.62M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35.62M (+2M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 0.28% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85.15s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85.39s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
101.2s (+0.02s)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
101.18s
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
69.1s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69.6s (+0.5s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.05% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
114.15Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
112.95Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
107.7Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
108.5Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
120.6Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
117.4Km/H (-3.2Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 3.17% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
31.5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
30.5 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
57 Points (-1 Points)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points (-1 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 7.12% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
35.9M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
38.65M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
50.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53.1M (+2.5M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
35.1M (+2.8M)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32.3M
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
27.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31.2M (+3.6M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
42.5M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
47.3M (+4.8M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
28.8M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
31M (+2.2M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
43.1M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
48.8M (+5.7M)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
23.58M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
26.82M (+3.24M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 7.73% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
34.6M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M (+2.9M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 3.5% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
68.71s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.2s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
67.51s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69.8s (+2.29s)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
69.9s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72.6s (+2.7s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.98% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75.65Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74.15Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
77.8Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.5Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.3Km/H (-2.2Km/H)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 4.84% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
31 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
29.5 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
57 Points (-1 Points)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
2 Points (-2 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 4.09% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
12.18s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
12.7s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
10.89s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.15s (+0.26s)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
11.11s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.71s (+0.6s)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
14.55s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
15.24s (+0.69s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 1.29% higher speed than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79.79Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.83Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
96.8Km/H (-3.5Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
100.3Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
72.66Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.76Km/H (-0.9Km/H)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.7Km/H (-2.9Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.6Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
78.9Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79.1Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79.1Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80.7Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
77.6Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76.5Km/H (-1.1Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport slipped out at a 0.74% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
24.34m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
24.16m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
66.88m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66.14m/sec2 (-0.74m/sec2)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.1m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3.04m/sec2 (-0.31m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3.35m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 4.32% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5.1 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.33 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
6 Points (-1 Points)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7 Points
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
4.3 Points (-0.7 Points)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5 Points
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points (-1 Points)

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 5.45% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
13 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
13.75 Points
Subjective in car noise levels, higher is better

Best In Subj. Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
22 Points (-1.5 Points)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
23.5 Points
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
4 Points

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during four noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 2.87% quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.05dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
70.95dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.8dB (+3.3dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
70.5dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70dB (+2dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.8dB (+2dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71.8dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
74.6dB (+1.1dB)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73.5dB

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is predicted to cover 19.68% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
43793.33KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
35176.67KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
35000KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32500KM (-2500KM)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
50500KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
40100KM (-10400KM)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
45880KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
32930KM (-12950KM)

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two value tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport proved to have a 11.46% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
11.98Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
13.53Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
18Price/1000 (+0.15Price/1000)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
17.85Price/1000
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.58Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.57Price/1000 (+1.99Price/1000)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.37Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
11.18Price/1000 (+2.81Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 7.23% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.68kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.98kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
8.53kg / t (+0.18kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.35kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
10.04kg / t (+1.18kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.86kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
10.15kg / t (+1.3kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.85kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.24kg / t (+0.05kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.19kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
10.42kg / t (+0.78kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
9.64kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro used 1.72% less fuel than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5.8l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport emitted 15.5% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63.8mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75.5mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63.8mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75.5mg/km/t (+11.7mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Driver Reviews

Across 115 reviews, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, strong braking, and confidence-inspiring handling, often rivaling or beating PS4/PS4S and PZ4. Many note it performs best when warmed and can be superb for spirited road use, with some citing good value. The most common drawbacks are rapid tread wear, higher noise and a firm ride, noticeable grip drop when cold, and poor durability on track abuse; a few also report slightly higher fuel consumption. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused drivers, with caveats on longevity and comfort.

Based on 120 reviews with an average rating of 80%

Vredestein Ultrac Pro Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.

Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 81%

Best Review for the Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Given 81% 225/45 R17 on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I have had these on the rear of my XFR for a few months now, it has the optional "R-S" size of 295/30/20. They get a hard life on a heavy >500bhp RWD car with quite relaxed electronics, and these are by far the best tyres I have used on the rear of an XFR - various models of which have been my daily driver for 6.5 years now (about 90k miles covered in that time). Traction is superb in wet and dry conditions, and resistance to aquaplaning has been good as well. It is slightly concerning they come with
Helpful 2774 - tyre reviewed on November 22, 2021
View all Bridgestone Potenza Sport driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Given 97% 245/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
I do a lot of research when I buy tires , I looked all around for a premium summer tire which would be suitable for my driving style, and for the condition of the roads in my country - Eastern Europe. I looked at the PilotSport 5, ContiSportContact 7 , Eagle F1 Assymetric - all of which have a very high rating overrall, but I felt that they weren't suitable for the road conditions - lots of bumps ,cracks on the roads, patches and lets never forget about the potholes. They say the PS5 doesn't really absorb much of the bumps and has a low aquaplaning score, which doesn't do the job for me. I... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1071 - tyre reviewed on June 17, 2024
View all Vredestein Ultrac Pro driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Bridgestone Potenza Sport performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [s], wet handling [km/h], subj. wet handling, wet circle, curved aquaplaning, wear, value and abrasion, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in straight aqua, subj. comfort, subj. noise, noise, rolling resistance and fuel consumption.

Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling and wet handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Bridgestone Potenza Sport seems to be the best tyre overall.

However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.

Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Overall Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.