Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Toyo Celsius AS2
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 81
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 6
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 10 times and the Celsius AS2 not once. The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped 7.7% shorter in the wet; the Celsius AS2 had 3.6% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 for mixed or harsh climates, safety-first drivers, and confident wet/snow performance. Choose Toyo Celsius AS2 for milder regions, high-mileage/ride-share use, and drivers prioritizing lower cost of ownership and efficiency over ultimate wet/winter grip.
Where the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is stronger
- Class-leading wet braking and wet handling across virtually all tests
- Stronger winter capability: shorter snow/ice braking and higher snow traction
- Balanced, precise handling with good comfort and low noise
Where the Celsius AS2 is stronger
- Lower rolling resistance and better fuel economy in most tests
- High projected mileage and strong value/pricing
- Stable dry handling and occasionally shorter dry braking
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Celsius AS2 at a glance
| Category | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Gap | Celsius AS2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won10 shared tests | 10 | 0 | |
| Dry17 measurements | 6 | The Celsius AS2 stopped 2.2% shorter in the dry (10 tests) | 9 |
| Wet36 measurements | 30 | The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped 7.7% shorter in the wet (10 tests) | 5 |
| Snow25 measurements | 24 | The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped 5.3% shorter on snow (7 tests) | 1 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort10 measurements | 8 | 1 | |
| Value17 measurements | 6 | The Celsius AS2 had 3.6% lower rolling resistance (6 tests) | 11 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 by 1.3 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating81 and 6 reviews | 82% | Too close to call | 82% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 78% | The Celsius AS2 by 5 points | 83% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | +15.7% | The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was dearer in 4 of 5 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 102 | 56 sizes made in both | 72 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2022 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Field | Celsius AS2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 15 | P14 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P6 of 37 | P12 of 37 | |
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P1 of 16 | P11 of 16 | |
| 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | P3 of 11 | P10 of 11 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P6 of 16 | P14 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout | P12 of 35 | P16 of 35 | |
| 2023 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P9 of 10 | |
| 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | P5 of 7 | P6 of 7 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P1 of 15 | P11 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P6 of 35 | P13 of 35 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Celsius AS2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 14 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Celsius AS2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Celsius AS2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81 reviews and the Celsius AS2 82% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Gap | Celsius AS2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.25 | 2.2% | 41.32 | 0-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 75.55 | 2.1% | 77.2 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 98.14 | 1.1% | 97.18 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 11.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.53 | 7.7% | 48.23 | 10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 | 7.2% | 43.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57.97 | 5.1% | 61.08 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.96 | 5.6% | 70.04 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 13.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.98 | 5.3% | 7.58 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.44 | 4% | 12.96 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78.69 | 0.3% | 78.37 | 4-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.03 | 3.2% | 3.08 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22.38 | 5.3% | 23.56 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.82 | 10% | 6.47 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,193 | 14.3% | 1,918 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85.78 | 3.2% | 88.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.28 | 4.6% | 51.84 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 6.5% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.98 | 5.5% | 3.77 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18.7 | 11.8% | 21.2 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 11.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.22 | 0.4 dB | 72.57 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,550 | 6.9% | 2,806 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56,321 | 4.6% | 58,110 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.46 | 3.6% | 8.15 | 1-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.41 | 1.4% | 5.34 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.6 | 9.8% | 18.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57 | 3.4% | 59 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 612 | 11.6% | 541 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scores 9.4 and the Celsius AS2 8.1 out of 10.
| Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Category | Celsius AS2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | Dry | 67 | ||
| 89 | Wet | 61 | ||
| 68 | Comfort | 23 | ||
| 73 | Value | 85 | ||
| 81 | Snow | 29 | ||
| 87 | Ice | 13 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Category | Celsius AS2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.3 | Dry Grip | 8 | ||
| 8.7 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 7.8 | Road Feedback | 7.8 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 7.2 | ||
| 8.6 | Wear | 8.5 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 9.8 | ||
| 8.4 | Snow Grip | 8 | ||
| 7.5 | Ice Grip | 6.7 | ||
Owners rate the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81 reviews and the Celsius AS2 82% from 6. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- 82%from 81 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 1,078,534 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 highly overall (average 79.9%), with most praising its dependable all-round grip, particularly in the wet, where over half of reviewers comment positively. Dry grip, snow traction and cold-weather performance are also frequently highlighted, and around a third of owners report strong tread life. The main recurring downsides are a noticeably weaker dry braking performance and slightly vague steering feel, raised by around one in five and around one in six owners respectively, while road noise feedback is mixed but leans positive.
- Confident wet grip in heavy rain and greasy conditions
- Strong dry grip for everyday driving
- Long tread life and slow wear rates
- Impressive snow traction for an all-season tyre
- Longer dry braking distances / less bite under heavy braking
- Vague or light steering feel and less direct response
- Higher rolling resistance / noticeable fuel economy drop for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 75 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 81 Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 reviewsAlmost perfect tyres that even didn't let my down in heavy snow which really amazed me. And driven normally they seem to last forever.
Toyo Celsius AS2
- 82%from 6 reviews
- 83%would buy again
- 25,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Celsius AS2 tyre delivers a notably comfortable, quiet ride with strong wet-road security and good resistance to aquaplaning. Most users also find dry grip solid and winter/snow capability surprisingly competent for an all-season, with only minor impacts on fuel economy. A recurring trade-off is a softer, more comfort-oriented feel that can come across as slightly spongy or less sharp in handling compared with sportier summer tyres.
- High comfort/ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong wet grip and stability
- Good resistance to aquaplaning
- Softer, less sporty steering/handling feel (slightly spongy)
Summarised by AI from 6 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 6 Celsius AS2 reviewsThis is just my initial review of them after around 1K miles, I've fitted these on my girlfriend's car since both her summer and winter sets were getting long in the tooth. The car doesn't get driven that much, and when it does it's mostly through town so I swallowed my tyre snobbery and decided all-seasons would be a good fit. I didn't get to test them in the snow however so far they've been really good in both wet and dry but what surprised me the most was the ride quality and the (lack of) noise. Fuel consumption doesn't seem to be affected that much either. I got a really good deal on them, less than €60/tyre, when most of the midrange competition is priced at 70 and above so I'm really happy with the purchase. Made in Japan too.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 102 sizes of the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 72 of the Celsius AS2, 56 of them made in both.
| Category | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Celsius AS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 102 sizes, 14 to 22 inch | 72 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 56 sizes 175/65 R14175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/65 R15195/45 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16and 44 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B87%C13% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C47%B29%A21%D4% | C78%D22% |
| EU label noise | 69-73 dB B99%A1% | 71-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 252 of 252 | 401 of 401 |
| Replaced | Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 (2021) | - |
| Replaced by | Goodyear Vector All Season 4 | - |
| Awards | Commended: Best All-Season Tyres (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2024) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2021) Winner: Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2021) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the dearer tyre in 4 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 15.7% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Goodyear's Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and Toyo's Celsius AS2 target the same premium all-season touring brief, but they approach it differently. Across 10 shared professional tests, the Goodyear consistently ranked near the top, including multiple test wins, while the Toyo trailed mid-pack yet often impressed on efficiency and value.
The headline trend is clear: the Goodyear dominates in grip-led safety metrics-especially in the wet and on snow-while the Toyo trades ultimate performance for longer life, lower rolling resistance, and a lower purchase price. Drivers weighing year-round safety margins versus running costs will find a distinct split between these two.
Conclusion
If you prioritize all-weather security and sure-footed handling, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is the stronger, more rounded performer. It swept wet braking in every shared result and repeatedly posted shorter snow stops and higher snow traction, translating to more margin in real-world rain, slush, and cold. Its only recurring blemish is average-to-long dry braking versus the class best, though its dry handling balance is typically excellent.
The Celsius AS2 offers compelling value: lower price, lower rolling resistance, and often superior projected mileage. However, its weaker wet and winter grip-longer wet stops by roughly 4-12% in many tests and notably lower snow traction-means it's better suited to milder climates and measured driving. In short: Goodyear for performance and safety in mixed weather; Toyo for budget, longevity, and efficiency where severe conditions are rare.
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Celsius AS2: your questions
Is the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 or the Toyo Celsius AS2 the better tyre?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 10 times and the Celsius AS2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scores 9.4 and the Celsius AS2 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 or the Celsius AS2?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 30 of the 36 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.7% shorter in the wet across 10 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Celsius AS2 led 9 of the 17 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter in the dry across 10 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 24 of the 25 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.3% shorter on snow across 7 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Celsius AS2 had 3.6% lower rolling resistance (6 tests) and used 1.4% less fuel (4 tests). Owners rate wear 8.6/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 8.5/10 for the Celsius AS2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 9.8/10 for the Celsius AS2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81 reviews and the Celsius AS2 82% from 6. 78% of Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Celsius AS2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the dearer tyre in 4 of them, by 15.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is made in 102 sizes (14 to 22 inch) and the Celsius AS2 in 72 (14 to 20 inch). 56 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Celsius AS2 B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
2-13 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
15-10 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook iON FlexClimate
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Toyo Celsius AS2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
14-7 in 21 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
5-11 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion