Menu

Ceat WinterDrive vs Fulda Kristall Control HP2

In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Ceat WinterDrive and the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tyres. The Ceat WinterDrive is an Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 is an High-Performance Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

WinterDrive VS Kristall-Control-HP2

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of four total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Ceat WinterDrivetwo
two wins
Fulda Kristall Control HP2two
two wins

The Ceat WinterDrive and Fulda Kristall Control HP2 have an equal number of test wins. However, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 7.27% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
42.75M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
46.1M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
42M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
45.3M (+3.3M)
Ceat WinterDrive
43.5M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
46.9M (+3.4M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive was 0.26% faster around a lap than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
114.4Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
114.4Km/H (-0.3Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 0.59% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
42.03M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
42.28M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
39M (+0.4M)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
38.6M
Ceat WinterDrive
34.5M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
35.9M (+1.4M)
Ceat WinterDrive
36.9M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
36.9M
Ceat WinterDrive
57.7M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
57.7M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 0.75% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
40M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
40M (+0.3M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was 0.37% faster around a wet lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
80.1Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
80.1Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive was 1.86% faster around a wet circle than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
12.93s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
12.93s (+0.24s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 floated at a 4.02% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
71.7Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
74.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
71.5Km/H (-2.5Km/H)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
74Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
71.9Km/H (-3.5Km/H)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
75.4Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 slipped out at a 19.22% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
2.55m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2 (-0.49m/sec2)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
2.55m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 stopped the vehicle in 1.04% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
24.08M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
23.83M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
30.2M (+0.6M)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
29.6M
Ceat WinterDrive
9.7M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
9.7M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M (+0.2M)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
28M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M (+0.2M)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
28M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive had 0.43% better snow traction than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
1396N
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
1390N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
245N
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
243N (-2N)
Ceat WinterDrive
2547N
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
2537N (-10N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive was 0.17% faster around a lap than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
57.9Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
57.9Km/H (-0.1Km/H)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was 5.02% faster through a slalom than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
2.99m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2 (-0.15m/sec2)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
2.99m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle 8.82% shorter than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
17M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
17M (+1.5M)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 scored 8.75% more points than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
8 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points (-0.7 Points)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
8 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two noise tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive measured 2.77% quieter than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
68.55dB
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
70.5dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
71.6dB
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
74.3dB (+2.7dB)
Ceat WinterDrive
65.5dB
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
66.7dB (+1.2dB)

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two wear tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive is predicted to cover 13.43% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
58270KM
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
50445KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
64600KM
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
56900KM (-7700KM)
Ceat WinterDrive
51940KM
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
43990KM (-7950KM)

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive proved to have a 26.8% better value based on price/1000km than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
10Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
10Price/1000 (+2.68Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 had a 1.87% lower rolling resistance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
8.9kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t (+0.17kg / t)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
8.9kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive and Fulda Kristall Control HP2 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
5.8l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well

Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
5.8l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive emitted 7.25% less particle wear matter than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69mg/km/t (+5mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Ceat WinterDrive and Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

In total the Ceat WinterDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has been reviewed 12 times and drivers have given the tyre 68% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.

Best Review for the Ceat WinterDrive
View all Ceat WinterDrive driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Given 90% 245/45 R18 V on a combination of roads for 3,500 average miles
Very good grip and driving in wet roads. Very good in poor snow, also in wet snow, but not very good in ice roads for braking and no good grip in ice. Noisy when speed more than 100km/h, but good handling and road feedback.
Helpful 1160 - tyre reviewed on January 29, 2019
View all Fulda Kristall Control HP2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Ceat WinterDrive performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet circle, snow traction, snow handling [km/h], ice braking, noise, wear, value and abrasion, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 performed better in wet handling [km/h], straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, snow braking, snow slalom, subj. comfort and rolling resistance.

Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, snow handling and fuel consumption, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Ceat WinterDrive seems to be the best tyre overall.

However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.

Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Ceat WinterDrive

Overall Winner: Ceat WinterDrive

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Ceat WinterDrive has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Ceat WinterDrive Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.