Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
The pattern is clear: Hankook dominates in safety-critical wet and dry metrics-especially wet braking-while Fulda occasionally edges it in specific snow sub-tests and subjective comfort. Longevity and efficiency tilt toward Hankook in recent tests, strengthening its value case despite a slightly higher set price.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i cept evo3 | seven |
While it might look like the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is better than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Strong in snow sub-tests (braking/traction/handling wins in several years)
- Comfortable ride and lower cabin noise in key tests
- Low rolling resistance and good efficiency in earlier results
- Occasionally better straight-line aquaplaning resistance and competitive wear in 2020
- Class-leading wet braking across all shared tests
- Sharper dry handling and shorter dry braking distances
- High predicted mileage and low abrasion in recent tests
- Well-rounded winter ability with confident snow performance and solid value
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 4.89% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.78% faster around a lap than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 6.82% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 6.25% less distance than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 3.29% faster around a wet lap than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 2.32% faster around a wet circle than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 floated at a 0.66% higher speed than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Straight Aqua: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 slipped out at a 6.25% higher speed than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during five snow braking tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 stopped the vehicle in 0.65% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Snow Braking: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 had 0.59% better snow traction than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Snow Traction: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.59% faster around a lap than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was 2.34% faster through a slalom than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Snow Slalom: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 stopped the vehicle 2.3% shorter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Ice Braking: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 scored 8.75% more points than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 measured 0.28% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Noise: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two wear tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is predicted to cover 12.79% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Wear: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one value tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 proved to have a 4.34% better value based on price/1000km than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Value: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 had a 5.26% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Fulda Kristall Control HP2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 used 1.72% less fuel than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 emitted 18.84% less particle wear matter than the Fulda Kristall Control HP2.
Best In Abrasion: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 generally report strong wet and snow traction, predictable handling, and good comfort/noise levels, with several noting good value and even low rolling resistance. High-scoring reviews particularly praise its stability and confidence in winter conditions. A minority highlight longer-term issues, citing performance deterioration as the rubber hardens with age and instances of uneven rear wear/cupping that can raise noise. Overall sentiment skews moderately positive with some durability/aging caveats.
Based on 11 reviews with an average rating of 68%
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 Driver Reviews
Most drivers report that the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 delivers excellent grip and confident handling in wet, dry, and snow, with many praising stability, aquaplaning resistance, and overall comfort/noise at highway speeds. Snow traction is frequently highlighted as a strong point, and several users note good value for money. A minority mention average/longer dry braking, modest sportiness, faster wear in harsh use, and occasional comfort/noise concerns. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high share of 80%+ reviews.
Based on 20 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Conclusion
The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 can appeal if your driving centers on frequent snow use at moderate speeds, you value a cushioned ride, and you're chasing low rolling resistance. However, its persistent wet-grip deficit and average dry control limit its versatility. With Hankook offering superior safety margins and longevity at only a modest price step, it represents the safer, more rounded investment for most drivers.
Key Differences
- Safety margin in the wet: Hankook stops 3-11% shorter in every wet braking result.
- Dry road control: Hankook exhibits better precision and shorter dry braking.
- Aquaplaning balance: Hankook leads or matches overall; Fulda has isolated straight-aqua wins.
- Snow nuance: Fulda nicks some snow braking/traction sub-tests; Hankook equals or narrowly trails but handles more securely overall.
- Longevity: Hankook shows markedly higher mileage (+18-27% in 2025 datasets) and lower abrasion.
- Operating costs: Hankook pairs long wear with slightly better fuel use in 2025; Fulda holds an edge in rolling resistance in older tests.
Overall Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.