2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test

Vi Bilägare magazines summer tyre test features eight tyres in size 235/55 R19, focusing on performance for EV SUVs. Testing took place in unusually cold conditions near Madrid, Spain, where temperatures hovered around 10°C - similar to Scandinavian spring or autumn weather.

The test featured six standard aftermarket tyres from premium and budget manufacturers, alongside two OE (Original Equipment) tyres specifically designed for Volkswagen and Volvo vehicles. The testing vehicle was a Kia EV6, a battery-electric SUV weighing 2,031kg, with some measurements also taken using a Tesla Model Y.

Standard Aftermarket Tyres vs OE Specifications

One of the most significant findings of this test was the big difference in performance between standard aftermarket tyres and those designed to OE specifications for car manufacturers.

The test deliberately included two OE tyres - one for Volkswagen and one for Volvo - to investigate the performance differences between these manufacturer-specific tyres and standard aftermarket options. Vi Bilägare deliberately chose not to name the tyre manufacturers of these OE products, stating that since the car manufacturers dictate the specifications and requirements, they should be held responsible for the resultant performance.

The test revealed that both OE tyres prioritize low rolling resistance and energy efficiency at a serious cost to safety performance. While the OE tyres delivered 9-10% better range than the average aftermarket tyre, they showed significantly compromised wet grip, braking distances, and aquaplaning resistance.

The Volvo OE tyre featured an "AA" EU label rating (A for rolling resistance, A for wet grip), yet the actual testing found its wet grip performance to be substantially below that of non-OE tyres. Similarly, the Volkswagen OE tyre demonstrated poor wet handling characteristics and early aquaplaning. Both OE tyres began to lose grip in standing water at speeds 10-12 km/h lower than the best-performing aftermarket tyres.

Of the two OE options, the Volvo specification performed marginally better in most tests, though still far below the premium aftermarket alternatives. The Volkswagen tyre lost rear grip more suddenly when pushed to its limits, though the testers noted this behavior should be considered with caution as the tyre wasn't designed specifically for the Kia test vehicle.

Sadly both OE tyres scored embarrassingly close to the budget Hifly tyre in total points, despite costing nearly twice as much. This led Vi Bilägare to conclude that consumers should avoid manufacturer-specific tyres when replacing their tyres, and instead choose standard aftermarket options with better safety credentials.

The test makes it clear that as vehicles become heavier with the integration of battery technology, the importance of high-quality tyres increases. The differences in handling characteristics become even more pronounced in emergency situations with heavier vehicles, making the compromised performance of the OE tyres particularly concerning.

Dry

In the dry braking test, both the Pirelli Scorpion and Nokian Hakka Black 3 led the pack with identical stopping distances of 42 meters. The OE tyres showed their compromise on safety, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre needing 44.4 meters to stop (2.4 meters longer than the best performers) while the Volvo-specific tyre (not shown in graph) performed slightly better but still lagged behind the premium offerings.

When it came to subjective dry handling, Continental PremiumContact 7 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tied for first place with perfect scores of 5 points. The manufacturer-specific tyres showed significant shortcomings here, with the Volkswagen OE tyre scoring just 2 points and the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) scoring 3 points, highlighting how much handling capability is sacrificed for efficiency in OE specifications.

Wet

The wet braking test revealed the Finnish Nokian Hakka Black 3 as the clear winner with a stopping distance of 41.6 meters. Both OE tyres struggled dramatically here, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre requiring 47.1 meters (5.5 meters longer than the Nokian) while the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) needed 44.8 meters - demonstrating just how much wet safety is compromised for fuel efficiency.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV dominated the wet handling lap times with 71.4 seconds. This test showed another significant gap for the OE tyres, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre posting the slowest time at 74.2 seconds (2.8 seconds slower than the Michelin). The Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) managed 73.0 seconds, slightly better than the VW but still well behind the premium options.

The wet circle test measures lateral grip in wet conditions, with Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performing best at 11.3 seconds. The OE tyres again couldn't match the premium offerings, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre needing 11.8 seconds and the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) requiring 11.6 seconds - reflecting their compromised wet handling capabilities.

The aquaplaning test revealed perhaps the most concerning safety deficit for OE tyres. The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV maintained traction up to 91.7 km/h, while the Volkswagen OE tyre lost grip at just 81.0 km/h - a critical 10.7 km/h difference. The Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) performed marginally better at 79.5 km/h but was actually the worst overall, highlighting a serious safety compromise in wet conditions.

Comfort

In the subjective comfort assessment, both the Pirelli Scorpion and budget Hifly HP801 achieved top scores of 5 points thanks to their softer constructions. The OE tyres performed reasonably well here, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre scoring 4 points and the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) also scoring 4 points - one area where the manufacturer-specific designs didn't compromise as significantly.

The Nokian Hakka Black 3 with its special SilentDrive technology dominated the noise test with a perfect 5-point score. The Volkswagen OE tyre performed well with 4 points, while the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) scored 3 points. This is one aspect where OE tyres tend to offer reasonable performance, as cabin comfort is also a priority for car manufacturers.

Value

The range test was where the OE tyres demonstrated their one key advantage, with the Volkswagen-specified tyre achieving the best range at 432 km and the Volvo OE tyre (not shown in graph) closely behind at 435 km. This represents approximately 9-10% better range than the average premium tyre, showing clearly what car manufacturers prioritize when specifying OE tyres - efficiency over safety.

Results

1^st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

235/55 R19 105Y XL

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV emerged as the overall test winner, displaying consistently high performance across wet and dry conditions. It excelled particularly in wet handling and aquaplaning resistance, where it achieved the best results in the test. The tyre offers precise steering feedback and excellent control during emergency maneuvers, making it easy for drivers to place the car exactly where intended. Though it comes with a relatively high price point, its superior grip and safety features justify the cost. The main drawbacks include somewhat limited comfort over rough surfaces and average rolling resistance. Michelin's victory in this test mirrors its previous win in SUV tyre testing, confirming its reliable performance regardless of whether it's fitted to diesel or electric vehicles.

Dry96.4%

Wet99%

Comfort50%

Range95%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5th / 6	43.9 m	+1.90 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1st / 6	5 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	2nd / 6	42.7 m	+1.10 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	1st / 6	71.4 s	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	2nd / 6	11.4 s	+0.10 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1st / 6	91.7 km/h	Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4th / 6	2 Points	-3.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	3rd / 6	3 Points	-2.00 Points
RangeHigher is better	3rd / 6	396 km	-21.00 km

EU Label

C/A/72

Price

2321.00

2^nd

Nokian Hakka Black 3

235/55 R19 105Y XL

The Nokian Hakka Black 3 SilentDrive stands out as the quietest tyre in the test, featuring a special noise-dampening felt mat inside the tyre. With the best wet braking performance and strong wet grip properties, the Finnish tyre handled the unusually cool test temperatures with ease. It tends to lose grip at the rear first, but does so predictably and remains easy to control. The Nokian comes well-equipped with aramid reinforcement to resist punctures, making it particularly suitable for SUVs, plug-in hybrids, and electric vehicles. Its combination of grip level and comfort earned it the same total score as the Michelin (86 points), but the testers prioritized safety over comfort, placing it second overall. It's among the more expensive options but delivers excellent value.

Dry96.6%

Wet98.6%

Comfort80%

Range94.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1st / 6	42 m	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 6	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	1st / 6	41.6 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better	2nd / 6	71.9 s	+0.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better	2nd / 6	11.4 s	+0.10 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4th / 6	84.9 km/h	-6.80 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	3rd / 6	3 Points	-2.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	1st / 6	5 Points	Best in this discipline
RangeHigher is better	4th / 6	393 km	-24.00 km

EU Label

C/A/71

Price

2450.00

3^rd

Pirelli Scorpion

235/55 R19 105Y XL

The Pirelli Scorpion, classified as a "High Performance" rather than "Ultra High Performance" tyre, emphasizes comfort and durability over maximum grip. This approach pays off with the highest comfort rating in the test and impressive tread wear rating of 400. The Pirelli rolls pleasantly over road imperfections and maintains a low noise level. While its steering response is slightly more relaxed than sportier alternatives, it still provides good, linear steering feel. Both in wet and dry conditions, the Scorpion behaves predictably under pressure with mild understeer, though its grip level is a step below the best performers. With good aquaplaning resistance and strong braking performance in the cool test temperatures, the Pirelli offers a harmonious driving experience at a reasonable price, earning it a bronze medal in the test.

Dry96.6%

Wet97.3%

Comfort90%

Range94%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1st / 6	42 m	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 6	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	3rd / 6	42.9 m	+1.30 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	5th / 6	72.9 s	+1.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better	5th / 6	11.5 s	+0.20 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3rd / 6	86.6 km/h	-5.10 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1st / 6	5 Points	Best in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	2nd / 6	4 Points	-1.00 Points
RangeHigher is better	5th / 6	392 km	-25.00 km

EU Label

B/A/68

Price

2199.00

4^th

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

235/55 R19 105Y XL

Dry94.9%

Wet96.8%

Comfort50%

Range95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3rd / 6	42.9 m	+0.90 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 6	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	5th / 6	44 m	+2.40 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	4th / 6	72.3 s	+0.90 s
Wet CircleLower is better	1st / 6	11.3 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	5th / 6	82.9 km/h	-8.80 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4th / 6	2 Points	-3.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	3rd / 6	3 Points	-2.00 Points
RangeHigher is better	2nd / 6	398 km	-19.00 km

EU Label

B/A/69

Price

2168.00

5^th

Continental PremiumContact 7

235/55 R19 105Y XL

The Continental PremiumContact 7, which won last year's summer tyre test, continues to show good performance in SUV dimensions, though like the Goodyear, it appears to lose some grip in the low test temperatures. Its steering is responsive with exemplary linear behavior, making it easy to position precisely during sudden maneuvers while maintaining control. The Continental recorded the lowest rolling resistance among non-manufacturer-specific tyres, making it the best at combining low energy consumption with high grip levels. Unfortunately, its aquaplaning properties are below average, and comfort is similarly lacking. These deficiencies result in a fifth-place finish with 72 points, despite its impressive handling characteristics and fuel efficiency. It represents a good balance of economy and performance.

Dry98.3%

Wet96.5%

Comfort40%

Range100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3rd / 6	42.9 m	+0.90 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1st / 6	5 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	4th / 6	43.9 m	+2.30 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	3rd / 6	72.2 s	+0.80 s
Wet CircleLower is better	2nd / 6	11.4 s	+0.10 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6th / 6	81.6 km/h	-10.10 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4th / 6	2 Points	-3.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	6th / 6	2 Points	-3.00 Points
RangeHigher is better	1st / 6	417 km	Best in this discipline

EU Label

C/A/72

Price

2288.00

Reference Tyre

Reference OE Summer

235/55 R19 101T

The Reference tyre (Volkswagen's manufacturer specification) clearly prioritizes energy efficiency over safety performance. This approach helps achieve impressive range figures for the vehicle brochure, but comes at a significant cost to grip and control. The EU label's B rating for wet grip hints at longer stopping distances, but the test reveals even more concerning deficiencies in curve grip and aquaplaning resistance. The tyre releases grip suddenly from the rear when pushed, though this behavior should be considered with caution as it wasn't specifically designed for the Kia test vehicle. Despite high comfort and energy consumption scores, its total point tally is embarrassingly close to the budget tyre in the test—a significant indictment of the manufacturer's prioritization of efficiency over safety. It's also the most expensive tyre tested, offering poor value for money.

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Result
Dry BrakingLower is better	44.4 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	47.1 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	74.2 s
Wet CircleLower is better	11.8 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	81 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	4 Points
RangeHigher is better	432 km

EU Label

A/B/71

Price

2674.00

7^th

Hifly HP801

235/55 R19 105W XL

The Chinese Hifly Vigorous HP801 attracts with its low price, but the test reveals significant safety compromises. Its most concerning weakness is poor lateral stability, making it unable to maintain control during sudden maneuvers with a heavy electric vehicle. The tyre lacks the side stability needed for heavier cars, resulting in difficult handling under pressure with severe fishtailing. Braking performance is limited, though not as poor as might be expected from a budget brand. The soft carcass does provide good rolling comfort, and the tyre scores well in aquaplaning resistance, with wet grip that's not as poor as seen in other budget tyres in previous years. Despite these few positive points, the Hifly is deemed directly unsuitable for heavy vehicles, even though it carries the correct weight rating. The test ranks it last with just 54 points, emphasizing that the low price comes with serious safety compromises.

Dry78.2%

Wet93.2%

Comfort80%

Range90.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6th / 6	46.6 m	+4.60 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	6th / 6	1 Points	-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	6th / 6	47.8 m	+6.20 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	6th / 6	73.8 s	+2.40 s
Wet CircleLower is better	6th / 6	12 s	+0.70 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2nd / 6	88.5 km/h	-3.20 km/h
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1st / 6	5 Points	Best in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better	3rd / 6	3 Points	-2.00 Points
RangeHigher is better	6th / 6	379 km	-38.00 km

EU Label

C/C/72

Price

1426.00