Menu

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 41%
Wet 59%
Dry 41% · Wet 59%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet

Test Results Data

Good Below Average 42 BEST
# Tyre Total Score Dry Wet
Braking M Handling s % Braking M %
1 Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS 100% 30.8 85.15 100% 27.6 100%
2 ▲1 Nexen N Fera SUR4G 95.9% 32.7 86.41 96.4% 28.9 95.5%
3 ▼1 Yokohama Advan A052 93.3% 32 85.16 98.1% 30.7 89.9%
Scroll for more
Dry 100% Wet 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 30.8 M
Dry Handling 85.15 s
Wet
Wet Braking 27.6 M
2
95.9%
Dry 96% Wet 96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 32.7 M
Dry Handling 86.41 s
Wet
Wet Braking 28.9 M
3
93.3%
Dry 98% Wet 90%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 32 M
Dry Handling 85.16 s
Wet
Wet Braking 30.7 M
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tyres based on what matters most to your driving style.
Each cell shows a bar comparing the tyre to the class leader for that test — a longer bar means stronger performance. Bar colour matches the test category.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tyre moves when your custom weighting is applied.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.