Menu

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One

Overall test winnerNokian Hakkapeliitta R5

The new Nokian Outpost nAT claims to be an all terrain tyre you can use in snow, but how good is it?

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One
265/65 R17 / 2023 View full image
Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One
Tyres tested
4
Tested size
265/65 R17
Disciplines
3

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

4 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

How the results are weighted

1st

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

+Best in all three snow tests by a wide margin, with the most grip and confidence everywhere.

Read full verdict
2nd

Nokian WR G4 SUV

+Second in all three snow tests, with predictable, safe grip.

−Well behind the winter tyre in every snow test.

Read full verdict
3rd

Nokian Outpost nAT

+Close to the all-weather tyre for snow braking and handling, and well ahead of the all-season tyre.

−Third in all three snow tests, with less feedback at the limit.

Read full verdict
4th

Nokian One

−Last in all three snow tests, with much less traction than the snow-rated tyres.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One · 265/65 R17

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The new Nokian Outpost nAT claims to be an all terrain tyre you can use in snow, but how good is it? Nokian invented winter tyres, so they're pretty confident, so confident in fact they suggested we test it against the king of winter tyres, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5, along with their much loved all weather tyre, the Nokian WRG4 SUV, and their high mileage all season tyre, the Nokian One SUV.

Before we start, it's worth noting that three of the tyres are 3PMSF marked, which is the 3 peak mountain snowflake symbol, sometimes called "severe snow rating". The Winter, All Weather and All Terrain tyres carry the 3PMSF marking, but the all season does not. The test size was 265/65 R17, and we used a Toyota Hilux for the test in RWD only mode.

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Show full testing methodology

Recorded test conditions

Snow Braking
40 → 5 km/h · -7–-9 °C
Snow Traction
5 → 35 km/h · -7–-9 °C
Snow Handling
-7–-9 °C

Score Weighting

Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.

TestWithin categoryShare of overall score
Snow · 100%
Snow Braking40%40%
Snow Traction40%40%
Snow Handling20%20%

Our standard methods

The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.

Snow Braking

For snow braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 50 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on a groomed, compacted snow surface, measuring 45-5 km/h. I generally use a wide VDA (vehicle dynamic area) and progressively move across the surface between runs so that no tyre ever brakes on the same piece of snow twice. My standard programme is twelve runs per tyre set, although the sequence can extend further if the data justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. The surface is regularly groomed throughout the session. To correct for changing snow surface conditions, I run reference tyres repeatedly — typically every two candidate test sets.

Snow Traction

For snow traction, I accelerate the vehicle from rest on a groomed snow surface with traction control active and measure speed and time using GPS telemetry. I typically use a 5–35 km/h measurement window to reduce the influence of launch transients and powertrain irregularities. I use a wide VDA (vehicle dynamic area) and progressively move across the surface between runs so that no tyre ever accelerates on the same piece of snow twice. The surface is regularly groomed throughout the session. I complete multiple runs per tyre set and average the valid results. Reference tyres are run typically every two candidate test sets to correct for changing snow surface conditions.

Snow Handling

For snow handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated snow handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible. The circuit is groomed and prepared after every run while tyres are being changed, so each set runs on a consistently prepared surface. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, excluding laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Because snow surfaces degrade more rapidly than asphalt, control runs are carried out more frequently — typically every two candidate test sets.

Snow Data

Snow traction is a difficult test for a tyre, especially on an unloaded pickup, so it gave us the largest differences between the tyres. The Winter was naturally the best, with the all weather around 18% slower in the acceleration test, the all terrain was 12% behind the all weather, and the all season another 11% behind the all terrain.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (5 - 35 km/h) [Average Temperature -8c]

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.92 s Best
5.8 s +0.88 s
6.96 s +2.04 s
8.44 s +3.52 s

The difference between best and worst was 71.5% (3.52 s).

Interestingly while the order remained the same for snow braking, the extra weight over the primary axle helped the all terrain finish closer to the all weather, and significantly ahead of the all season.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (40 - 5 km/h) [Average Temperature -8c]

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
15.3 m Best 0 km/h
20.14 m +4.84 m 64 km/h
20.72 m +5.42 m 66 km/h
23.88 m +8.58 m 78 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 56.1% (8.58 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nokian One would still be travelling at 78 km/h when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

While the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was unsurprisingly the fastest around the lap, the real brilliance of a full winter tyre came in the subjective handling - the confidence you felt on the Hakka R5 was unrivaled. The all terrain was close to the all weather in time, but the all weather tyre felt more balanced around the lap.

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds [Average Temperature -8c]

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
89.6 s Best
98.3 s +8.70 s
98.65 s +9.05 s
105 s +15.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (15.4 s).

Results

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs OneWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

265/65 R17
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 is totally joyful tyre to drive on snow, and proof that a good winter tyre can make anything fun in the snow as it made the test Toyota Hilux exceptional fun! Compared to the other tyres it just had more grip everywhere, loads of front end grip on turn in, no understeer at all and loads of traction at the rear and when it was sliding it was controllable. This tyre is one of the kings of snow performance, and it shows.
All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 415.3 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 44.92 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 489.6 sBest in this discipline
3PMSF
Yes
2nd

Nokian WR G4 SUV

265/65 R17
Nokian WR G4 SUV
Admittedly the WRG4 couldn't match the winter tyre in the snow, but it's not a winter tyre, it's an all weather tyre so should be better in the dry and wet, but the grip is offered was predictable and safe.
All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 420.14 m+4.84 m
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 45.8 s+0.88 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 498.3 s+8.70 s
3PMSF
Yes
3rd

Nokian Outpost nAT

265/65 R17
Nokian Outpost nAT
The Nokian Outpost nAT was way closer to the all weather than the all season tyre, which is very impressive. It's worth reminding you that we're testing on very hard packed snow at around -17c / 0f!
Sure, the all terrain tyre felt a little more like a blunt instrument, there was less feedback around the limit of grip and even coming out of the garage you could tell that it's a more solid tyre, but considering you could do a weekend of winter offroading in the sunshine then drive back home through a where it's snowing and still be better off than everyone on their all season tyres - it's a very impressive blend.
All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 420.72 m+5.42 m
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 46.96 s+2.04 s
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 498.65 s+9.05 s
3PMSF
Yes
4th

Nokian One

265/65 R17
Nokian One
A lot of tyre retailers are wanting to recategorise all season tyres to "three season tyres" to acknowledge their limited snow performance, but the Nokian One HT was surprisingly good, for its category. However, it's still nearly 20% slower than the winter tyre around the lap and easily 100% less confidence inspiring. Traction as always was the most noticeable thing when comparing all season tyres to full winters, , the small inclines on the track were taken much slower with minimal acceleration. Turning was fine at lower speeds but there was no reserves on the all season tyre.
All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 423.88 m+8.58 m
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 48.44 s+3.52 s
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 4105 s+15.40 s

Discussion

3 comments
  1. Drew archived

    Wonderful review and comparative analysis! But why not include the Outpost APT as the fifth contender? Or please do a separate review on the Outpost APT. I think many people would LOVE to know how the APT stacks up against (between?) the nAT and the WRG4. I currently run a set of APTs and I believe they are very good in the rain and slush and light snow but I haven't yet had a true winter experience with them and, more importantly, haven't seen any specs on stopping distance etc. like you provide with the other tires. Anyway, love your reviews and hope to hear what you have to say about this interesting tire the Nokian Outpost APT. https://www.nokiantires.com...

    #9247
    1. TyreReviews Drew archived

      If I recall at the time of filming it wasn't possible to get the APT in the test size.

      #9250
      1. Drew TyreReviews archived

        OK thank you very much for the reply. I really wish they could have included a fifth wheel...

        Do you have any reviews planned for the Nokian Outpost APT?

        I'm certain that all of us who run them would love to see you put them through the wringer, especially on Nokian's winter track.

        #9323
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.