Menu
Arivo Carlorful AS View Gallery (1)
145-285/45-80 R13-20 71 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Arivo Carlorful AS

The Arivo Carlorful AS is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
0%
Wet Grip
0%
Road Feedback
0%
Handling
0%
Wear
0%
Comfort
0%
Buy again
0%
Snow Grip
0%
Ice Grip
0%
3 Tests (avg: 21st)
Arivo Carlorful AS

Arivo Carlorful AS

All Season Budget
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
84
0.84x / 1 test
Value
78.2
0.42x / 5 tests
Snow
72.8
1.38x / 6 tests
Comfort
71
0.32x / 3 tests
Dry
51.9
1.5x / 4 tests
Wet
42.3
1.93x / 10 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
72.4
2 tests
Braking
59.1
10 tests
Handling
40
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 3
Period: 2024 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 0
Avg Rating: 0%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.77
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2025 215/55 R17 11/13 14 metrics
2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test ADAC 2025 225/45 R17 15/16 13 metrics
2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 225/50 R17 36/37 2 metrics
3
Tests
21st
Average
11th
Best
36th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
11th/13
The Arivo Carlorful A/S represents the cheapest candidate in the test, managing acceptable snow performance but failing dramatically in critical safety areas. While the tyre delivers budget-friendly pricing and performs reasonably well on snow-covered roads, these minor positives cannot overcome its serious deficiencies. The most alarming weakness appears in wet braking, where the Arivo stops a dangerous 20 meters longer than the test winner from 100 km/h—that's more than four car lengths of additional stopping distance that could mean the difference between a near-miss and a serious accident. The wet handling is equally concerning, feeling unpredictable and untrustworthy when roads are damp. Dry handling also disappoints with vague feedback and imprecise responses. The relatively high rolling resistance further diminishes its value proposition. Bargain hunters who choose this tyre to save money are gambling with their safety and that of others—a risk no responsible driver should take when better budget options like the Ceat and GT Radial exist.
15th/16
The Arivo Carlorful A/S receives an overall driving safety rating of "deficient." This is primarily due to significant weaknesses on wet roads, which led to a downgrade of the final score. On dry roads, its performance is merely "adequate," providing poor steering feedback and precision, requiring constant corrections from the driver, and exhibiting early oversteer during lane changes. On wet surfaces, the tyre reaches its limits, earning a "deficient" rating for its braking distance and handling due to very low grip, making it difficult to control. Its winter performance is deemed satisfactory overall, securing good marks for ice braking and snow traction, but only satisfactory or adequate ratings for snow braking and handling. In contrast, the Chinese-made tyre achieves a good environmental result, with positive scores for projected mileage, wear, and low fuel consumption. However, its sustainability is rated as just "adequate" because the manufacturer failed to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.
36th/37
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D C 69
155/80R13 79 T D C 68
14 inch
165/70R14 81 T D C 69
185/70R14 88 H D C 69
175/65R14 82 T D C 69
185/60R14 82 H D C 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D C 68
185/70R14 88 H D C 68
185/60R14 82 H D C 68
175/65R14 82 T D C 68
15 inch
195/65R15 95 V XL C C 70
195/65R15 91 H C C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
185/65R15 92 T XL D C 69
195/65R15 91 H D C 69
195/65R15 95 V XL D C 69
195/55R15 85 V D C 69
185/65R15 88 H D C 68
16 inch
215/70R16 100 H C C 71
205/60R16 96 V XL C C 71
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 71
205/55R16 91 H C C 71
215/60R16 99 H XL C C 71
205/60R16 96 V XL D C 69
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 69
205/55R16 91 H D C 69
215/70R16 100 H D C 69
215/60R16 99 V XL D C 69
17 inch
235/65R17 108 H XL C C 71
225/60R17 99 H C C 71
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 71
225/45R17 94 W XL C C 71
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 71
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 71
215/45R17 91 W XL C C 71
215/55R17 98 W XL D C 69
235/65R17 108 H XL D C 69
215/45R17 91 W XL D C 69
225/60R17 99 H D C 69
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 69
225/45R17 94 W XL D C 69
225/50R17 98 W XL D C 69
18 inch
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 72
245/45R18 100 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 71
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 72
245/40R18 97 W XL D C 69
235/60R18 107 V XL D C 69
225/40R18 92 Y XL D C 69
245/45R18 100 W XL D C 69
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W XL C C 72
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 69
20 inch
245/35R20 95 W XL C C 72
255/45R20 105 W XL C C 72
255/45R20 105 W XL D C 70
245/35R20 95 W XL D C 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Arivo Carlorful AS >>

Questions and Answers for the Arivo Carlorful AS

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Arivo Carlorful AS. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Arivo Carlorful AS tyre?

Unfortunately we don't yet have any tyre reviews of the Arivo Carlorful AS but people are searching for information on it.

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Carlorful AS.

Review Your Tyres >>

Rate the Arivo Carlorful AS