Continental Sport Contact 5 - Test Results
Test Statistics
26
Tests Completed3rd
Average Position1st
Best Result8th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 26 summer tests, the Continental Sport Contact 5 delivers consistently high all-round performance with an average overall position of 2.5 and numerous test wins from 2013-2016. It repeatedly excels in wet and dry handling/braking, often topping subjective driving feel and objective lap/brake metrics. Awards and wins in ADAC (2016, 2013), Auto Express (2015, 2013), EVO (2015, 2014), and multiple other European tests underline a broadly superior dynamic capability.
Weaknesses are limited but include elevated noise and fuel use/rolling resistance versus the best, and clear aging in later, more demanding UHP comparisons (notably 2017), where it fell to lower rankings versus newer rivals. Still, the pattern shows a tyre that was class-leading for several years and remains competitive, especially in wet performance and overall balance.
Performance Strengths
-
Wet Weather Performance
Strong
Details
• 1st overall ADAC 2016 (data-driven test emphasis on wet safety)
• 1st overall European/ADAC 2013 citing 'clearly the best in the wet'
• 3rd/8 wet braking +0.7% from best in 2020 Gute Fahrt
• 3rd/8 wet circle +2.6% from best; 3rd/8 straight aquaplaning +1.5% from best in 2020 Gute Fahrt
-
Dry Handling and Braking
Strong
Details
• 1st place EVO 2015 overall (noted class-leading dry lap times/feel within 1%)
• 2016 Auto Express: won dry handling laps (article)
• 2020 Gute Fahrt: 1/8 dry braking; 1/8 subjective dry handling
-
Overall Balance/All-Round Ability
Strong
Details
• Multiple overall wins: 2016 Test World 1/13; 2016 GTU 1/14; 2016 ADAC 1/16; 2015 Auto Express 1/11; 2015 Auto Review 1/9; 2015 AMS 1/9; 2014 EVO 1/10; 2014 Auto Zeitung 1/12; 2014 ACE 1/11; 2013 Auto Bild 1/8; 2013 European test 1/18
• Average overall position 2.5 across 26 tests
-
Subjective Driving Feel
Strong
Details
• 2014 EVO: excelled in subjective feel and objective handling
• 2016 Auto Express: won wet and dry handling laps (article)
• 2020 Gute Fahrt: 1/8 subjective wet handling; 1/8 subjective dry handling
-
Rolling Resistance (relative competitiveness in some tests)
Minor
Details
• 2016 GTU article: only area Goodyear beat Continental was rolling resistance
• 2020 Gute Fahrt: rolling resistance 3/8, +4.1% from best
Performance Weaknesses
-
Aging Performance vs Newer UHP Rivals
Strong
Details
• 2017 Auto Bild UHP: 8/9 with large deficits (wet braking +9%, wet handling +6.8%, dry braking +3.9%)
• 2017 Sport Auto: 4/10 overall with mid-pack wet/dry braking (6/10)
-
Noise/Comfort
Moderate
Details
• 2012 Auto Bild: lost points for being very noisy
• 2020 Gute Fahrt: subjective noise 4/8 (+33.3% from best), comfort 4/8 (+33.3% from best)
-
Fuel Use / Rolling Resistance (vs class leaders)
Moderate
Details
• 2016 Auto Express: 'only really struggling with fuel use' (article)
• 2016 GTU: Goodyear/Dunlop had extremely impressive rolling resistance beating Continental
-
Price/Value
Minor
Details
• 2012 Auto Bild: most expensive tyre on test affected result (6/15)
Performance Over Time
Test History
2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test
2020
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Dry Braking, Subj. Dry Handling, Subj. Wet Handling
Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tyre Test
2015
2015 Auto Express Tyre Test
2015
2015 Auto Review Summer Tyre Test
2015
2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test
2014
2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
2014
2013 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
2013
2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test
2013
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tyre Test
2013
Winner: Dunlop SportMaxx RT
2012 EVO Summer Tyre Test
2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero
2012 Subjective Shootout - Battle of the heavyweights
2012
Winner: Dunlop SportMaxx RT