The Russians always put on an interesting tyre test. Usually, their tyre tests crun big, ultra high performance tyres on powerful cars, and give an excellent account of just how each tyre feels on the limit. This time, it's a little bit different.
Testing "touring / high performance" tyres in 225/45 R17 on an Audi A3 Saloon, Auto Review have tried to test eight of the latest non-ultra high performance tyres, and included a Pirelli P Zero as a benchmark ultra high performance tyre. While this is a great idea in theory, the entry from Continental and Hankook are classified as ultra high performance, so the inclusion of the "extra" Pirelli seems a little confusing. Still, it gives us a nice mixed tyre test, and allows each tyre to highlight its strengths.
As usual, the tyres get a good workout, covering all the normal dry and wet tests you can expect, along with an added "shock / impact" test. For this test, the magazine run the car into a 45 degree, curb sized steel block at increasing speeds until the tyre fails. Unsurprisingly, the results from this destructive test shows rough correlation between the lighter, more comfortable, low rolling resistance tyres failing earlier than the less comfortable, sportier tyres.
The difference between the UHP Pirelli P Zero and the rest? As you'd expect, the P Zero is the tyre to have fitted if you're after the ultimate driving experience, and the equally as sporty Continental Sport Contact 5 isn't far behind. The best premium touring tyre, the Michelin Primacy 3 trades a little of that sporty feel for higher levels of comfort, lower noise and better fuel economy.
Full Results
Continental Sport Contact 5
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 18 |
| Wet | 49 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Toughness | 8 |
| Overall | 9.2 |
Total: 99.2
Pirelli P Zero
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 19 |
| Wet | 46 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Toughness | 10 |
| Overall | 9 |
Total: 99
Michelin Primacy 3
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 16 |
| Wet | 45 |
| Comfort | 10 |
| Rolling Resistance | 9 |
| Toughness | 8 |
| Overall | 8.8 |
Total: 96.8
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 17 |
| Wet | 47 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Toughness | 7 |
| Overall | 8.7 |
Total: 94.7
Nokian Hakka Blue
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 15 |
| Wet | 45 |
| Comfort | 10 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Toughness | 8 |
| Overall | 8.6 |
Total: 93.6
Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 16 |
| Wet | 40 |
| Comfort | 10 |
| Rolling Resistance | 10 |
| Toughness | 6 |
| Overall | 8.4 |
Total: 90.4
Toyo Proxes CF2
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 15 |
| Wet | 42 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Toughness | 9 |
| Overall | 8.3 |
Total: 91.3
Bridgestone Turanza T001
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 15 |
| Wet | 40 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Toughness | 8 |
| Overall | 7.8 |
Total: 86.8
Dunlop SP Sport LM704
225/45 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 15 |
| Wet | 20 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Toughness | 9 |
| Overall | 5.8 |
Total: 64.8

My car has 215/55r17 tires. Im planing to 225/50r17, wich tires are more confortable Michelin Primacy 3 or Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
From the bulk of the tests, it looks to be the Goodyear leading in comfort.
How about Yokohama Advan DB...?
We're not sure if Yokohama was asked to submit a tyre.
Yes, the Conti PC5 would have been apter than the SC5 in this company. I had thought that Bridgestone had recompounded the T001 for better braking but that doesn't show.
Curiously, in Auto Bild's 185/60-15 summer tyre test 2015, the T001 performs as well in wet or dry as the test winning Conti PC5. Perhaps it's another case of some tyres working better in some sizes than others.
The latest Auto Express tyre test in the UK doesn't do the Bridgestone T001 any favours either. 225/45 R17 again. We'll have a story about it soon!
I've noted that usually the t001 comes up short in the wet, with the odd sporadic test result contradicting this, maybe it is size related or maybe the tyres are produced in more than one factory, with one pperhaps not processing the compound as well as the other, or maybe even utilising raw materials of a differing quality, or both?...
For one of the 'big 6', Bridgestone generally don't perform too well, similar to Pirelli, they can mmake some relatively rubbish tyres along with some rather decent ones, which I find rather odd...
Bridgestone are aware their product are behind the curve and are working hard on it. They're still the biggest tyre manufacturer in the world, don't expect them to be down for long! One of their big problems as OE, they have so many different OE agreements in place, producing new tyres is difficult while they keep up OE production of older tyres. Pirelli have a similar problem, but to a lesser degree, as the largest OE in Europe.
Nice info there, cheers!
I've often wondered if tyre manufacturers continue with old patterns for car manufacturers, having seen so many new or extremely young cars fitted with patterns long since superseded... One example is the Michelin e3a/e3b, you cannot buy these for love nor money, and even if you find one n.o.s it's been sat on a rack a good many years...
They'll continue as long as there's either a demand, or an OE agreement in place for the tyres. It's why you can still buy the Pirelli P6000 and Continental Sport Contact 2 for example! The OE process can take years, we've actually an article coming out soon on the process :)
Sounds good, I await that one! :-)
Wish I was privy to such stuff, you have all the fun!... :-(