Menu

Nokian Hakka Blue

The Nokian Hakka Blue is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
85%
Handling
77%
Wear
62%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
70%
6 Reviews
76% Average
62,317 miles driven
6 Tests (avg: 4th)
Nokian Hakka Blue

Nokian Hakka Blue

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 6
Publications: 2
Period: 2012 - 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 76.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 Auto Review Summer Tyre Test 2015 225/45 R17 5/9 0 metrics
2015 Test World Summer Tyre Test Test World 2015 205/55 R16 2/15 0 metrics
2014 Auto Review Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Review 2014 205/55 R16 7/16 0 metrics
2014 Test World Summer Tyre Test Test World 2014 205/55 R16 3/16 0 metrics
2013 Test World Summer Tyre Test Test World 2013 205/55 R16 3/13 0 metrics
2012 Autoreview Touring Tyre Test Auto Review 2012 205/55 R16 2/9 0 metrics
6
Tests
4th
Average
2nd
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2nd/15
Good handling on wet surfaces. Low noise level and rolling resistance.
Relatively long braking distances
The Nokian Hakka Blue has excellent feel on wet surfaces where they have a high grip and stable control even in an emergency. In the dry the tyres also adequately react to the actions of the driver during abrupt manoeuvres. Low noise, smooth running and low rolling resistance.
5th/9
High resistance to aquaplaning, good wet grip, comfortable
Dry grip
The Nokian has the second best aquaplaning resistance, and an all round strong wet performance, but isn't quite a match for the best in the dry. The tyre offers good comfort, shock resistance and rolling resistance
3rd/16
Good handling on wet roads, low noise, low rolling resistance
Relatively long braking distances in the dry
The Nokian is well suited for driving on wet roads, which showcases the successful combination of high grip, precise steering response and, if required, predictable behavior during abrupt maneuvers. In the dry the tyre isn't as strong, with longer dry braking distances. Low noise and low rolling resistance give the Nokian a solid third

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Hakka Blue

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian Hakka Blue. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian Hakka Blue Reviews

Given 67% while driving a Skoda Octavia (205/55 R16 W) on mostly country roads for 17 easy going miles
Worst Wear I've ever experienced , almost didn't make the MOT because of treadwear down at 1,7 mm.
This AFTER 27.000 km !
Learned from the MOT-man that Nokian have failed totally with the rubber mixture and that the "body" of the Tire is to weak and can't take the Centrifugal force, even if You'r driving with 2,6 kg pressure. He's driving with 3,0 kg ! But then it runs like a Tram !
Checked the info with my friend at home who owns the local tyre-dealer and he confirmed that the Nokian Rep. had said the same and that the Nokian Black was even worse 10.000 km's is not an un-common wear-distance for them !
They are in PANIC trying to find a solution (new rubber mixture and construction) but will not compensate the customers in any way !
Hopefully 2018 might have a compl. new Hakka Blue !
August 7, 2017
Given 59% while driving a Ford Mondeo (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Not good enough.
April 6, 2014
Given 90% while driving a Opel Vectra B (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,500 average miles
one o fthe best tyers i had they have great gripp on rainy Days and sweet gripp on sunny Days and they are quete. can bairly hear them totaly recomend them to ewry one that dosent have a supersportcar and my fuel bill has gone down abit.
April 11, 2013

How would you rate the Nokian Hakka Blue?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian Hakka Blue Reviews

Rate the Nokian Hakka Blue