Menu

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 - Test Results

Test Statistics

8

Tests Completed

7th

Average Position

4th

Best Result

20th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 - Official Image

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 delivers balanced winter capability with standout handling on dry and snow tracks, plus competitive snow braking. Across eight tests it averages mid-pack overall (7.4), with several top-three subtest finishes in handling disciplines. However, it shows recurring weaknesses in dry braking, wet braking/handling, and efficiency (rolling resistance, noise), and one notably poor full-test result in 2017.
Overall, it suits drivers prioritizing dynamic feel and snow control over shortest braking distances and refinement. Performance varies by size/test, but patterns indicate reliable snow traction and agile handling offset by below-average stopping power and comfort/efficiency metrics.

Performance Strengths
  • Dry Handling Strong
    • 1st place dry handling in 2017 Sport Auto (225/40 R18)
    • 3rd place dry handling in 2017 AMS (225/40 R18, +0.3% from best)
    • 3rd place dry handling in 2017 Auto Bild SUV (114 km/h, +0.6% from best)
  • Snow Performance Moderate
    • 1st place snow braking in 2017 Sport Auto (29.7 m)
    • Top-5 snow braking/handling in 2019 (5/12 braking, +3.6%; 5/11 handling, +1.4%)
    • Top-3 snow braking in 2017 Auto Bild SUV (22.4 m, +1.8%)
  • Wet Handling/Control Minor
    • 4th place wet handling in 2019 (+2.2% from best)
    • Mid-field wet handling in 2017 AMS (8/10, +6.3%) and 2017 SUV (7/11, +4.3%)
  • Value/Pricing (select tests) Minor
    • Price 5/11 in 2019 (+33% from best)
    • Price 4/10 in 2017 SUV (+84.6% from best; still upper third ranking)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Braking Strong
    • 12/12 in 2019 (+19.6% from best)
    • 11/11 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV (+23% from best)
    • 10/10 in 2017 Sport Auto (+7.5% from best)
    • 15/21 in 2017 Auto Bild (+20.3% from best)
  • Wet Braking Strong
    • 10/10 in 2017 AMS (+12.1% from best)
    • 9/11 in 2017 SUV (+9.6% from best)
    • 17/21 in 2017 Auto Bild (+15.8% from best)
    • 4/12 in 2019 (+4.2% from best; isolated better result)
  • Rolling Resistance/Efficiency Moderate
    • 12/12 in 2019 (+28.4% from best)
    • 15/21 in 2017 Auto Bild (+15.6%)
    • 8/11 in 2017 SUV (+12.7%)
  • Noise/Comfort Moderate
    • 12/12 in 2019 noise (+7.1% from best)
    • 8/10 in 2017 AMS (+1.2%)
    • 15/21 in 2017 Auto Bild (+3.7%)
  • Wet Handling/Aquaplaning Consistency Moderate
    • 21/21 wet handling in 2017 Auto Bild (+8.9%)
    • 7/10 wet handling in 2017 Sport Auto (+4.1%)
    • 8/10 wet handling in 2017 AMS (+6.3%)
    • Straight aqua 9/12 in 2019 (+7.1%) and 8/11 in 2017 SUV (+8.5%)
Performance Over Time

Test History

5
of 12
2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test

2019
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

Weak:
Noise, Dry Braking, Rolling Resistance
4
of 10
2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Conditionally recommended
Strong:
Dry Handling, Snow Braking
Weak:
Dry Braking
6
of 11
2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

Satisfactory
Weak:
Dry Braking
20
of 21
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

Average.
Weak:
Snow Handling, Wet Handling
8
of 10
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Recommended with restrictions
Weak:
Wet Braking
6
of 8
2016 AutoBild Winter UHP Tyre Test

2016
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

Good.
5
of 13
2016 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/45 R17

2016
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

5
of 8
2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test

2015
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5