Menu

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 - Test Results

Test Statistics

11

Tests Completed

3rd

Average Position

1st

Best Result

6th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 - Official Image

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 delivers consistently strong winter UHP performance with an average overall position of 3.4 across 10 winter tests. Its standout trait is wet performance, repeatedly winning or placing on the podium in wet braking and handling, while also offering competent snow traction/handling. Dry handling is generally solid mid-upper tier, though dry braking can lag. Later large-rim tests highlight weaknesses in aquaplaning, noise, rolling resistance, and price/value, tempering its otherwise well-rounded dynamic capability.

Performance Strengths
  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    • 1st place wet braking in 2017 Sport Auto (35.7 m)
    • 1st place wet handling in 2017 Sport Auto (73.8 km/h)
    • 3rd wet braking in 2017 AMS (+5.3% from best)
    • 3rd wet braking in 2019 Auto Bild (+3.1% from best)
  • Snow Traction and Handling Moderate
    • 1st place snow handling in 2017 Sport Auto (56.5 km/h)
    • Best traction mention in 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Test
    • Mid-pack but close gaps in 2017 AMS snow metrics (+0.4% handling, +3.6% braking)
  • Overall Competitiveness/Awards Strong
    • 2nd overall in 2015 Sport Auto (235/35 R19)
    • 2nd overall in 2014 Auto Bild (235/35 R19)
    • 2nd overall in 2012 Auto Bild (225/40 R18)
    • 3rd overall in 2012 Sport Auto and 2011 AMS
  • Dry Handling Stability Moderate
    • 4th dry handling in 2019 Auto Bild (+3.2% from best)
    • 5th dry handling in 2017 Sport Auto (+0.5% from best)
    • 6th dry handling in 2017 AMS (+1.5% from best)
  • Noise Comfort Minor
    • 2nd place noise in 2017 AMS (72.5 dB, +0.1% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Moderate
    • 9th straight aquaplaning in 2019 Auto Bild (+7.1% from best)
    • 6th straight aquaplaning in 2017 AMS (+2.1% from best)
  • Dry Braking Strong
    • 8th dry braking in 2019 Auto Bild (+14.4% from best)
    • 9th dry braking in 2017 Sport Auto (+6.4% from best)
    • 6th dry braking in 2017 AMS (+4.3% from best)
  • Rolling Resistance and Efficiency Moderate
    • 9th rolling resistance in 2019 Auto Bild (+16.5% from best)
    • 7th rolling resistance in 2017 AMS (+16.9% from best)
  • Price/Value Moderate
    • 11th/11 price ranking in 2019 Auto Bild (+86.4% from best)
  • Noise (large sizes) Minor
    • 10th noise in 2019 Auto Bild (+5.9% from best)
Performance Over Time

Test History

6
of 12
2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test

2019
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

Weak:
Price
3
of 10
2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Recommended
Strong:
Snow Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling
Weak:
Dry Braking
4
of 10
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tyre Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Recommended
Strong:
Noise
5
of 8
2016 AutoBild Winter UHP Tyre Test

2016
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

Good.
2
of 7
2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tyre Test

2015
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Particularly recommended
4
of 8
2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test

2015
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

2
of 6
2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 Winter Tyre Test

2014
Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Exemplary
3
of 8
2012 Sport Auto Winter Sports Tyre Test

2012
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 830 P

2
of 6
2012 Auto Bild Sports Winter Tyre Test

2012
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip 8 Performance

Exemplary
3
of 14
2011 AMS Winter Tyre Test

2011
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip 8