Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 88% · 9
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 83% · 37
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 7 times and the Krisalp HP3 not once, with one level. The Blizzak 6 stopped 5.6% shorter in the wet; the Krisalp HP3 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 3.2% higher speed.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 if your winter driving is mostly cold-wet tarmac, mixed commuting and motorways, and you want consistently top-tier wet stopping power plus stronger dry-road control. Choose the Kleber Krisalp HP3 if you regularly face sustained snow/packed-snow conditions (mountain regions, rural roads) and prioritize maximum snow braking/traction-accepting that wet braking and overall balance are not its strongest suits, though it can offer better value for snow-focused use.
Where the Blizzak 6 is stronger
- Consistently shorter wet braking in every shared test (7/7 wins), with some large real-world gaps (e.g., 34.6 m vs 37.8 m; 32.4 m vs 35.4 m)
- Stronger dry-road performance: wins on dry braking and dry handling wherever measured, supporting stable cold-weather motorway and clear-road driving
- Typically higher overall rankings across major tests (e.g., 3/31 ADAC, 3/20 Auto Bild, 1/55 braking test), reflecting better all-round balance
Where the Krisalp HP3 is stronger
- Outstanding snow braking consistency (wins 7/7), including clear advantages in some sizes (e.g., 25.2 m vs 27.3 m in sport auto)
- Very competitive snow dynamics beyond braking: often better snow slalom/handling and traction, with testers noting large safety reserves on snow
- Frequently stronger straight-line aquaplaning resistance (wins all reported straight-aqua comparisons), a useful benefit in heavy motorway rain
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Blizzak 6 vs Krisalp HP3 at a glance
| Category | Blizzak 6 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won8 shared tests | 7 | 1 level | 0 |
| Dry10 measurements | 9 | The Blizzak 6 stopped 1.5% shorter in the dry (5 tests) | 1 |
| Wet28 measurements | 20 | The Blizzak 6 stopped 5.6% shorter in the wet (8 tests) | 7 |
| Snow22 measurements | 3 | The Krisalp HP3 stopped 2.6% shorter on snow (8 tests) | 18 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort8 measurements | 3 | The Krisalp HP3 was 0.6 dB quieter (5 tests) | 5 |
| Value10 measurements | 7 | The Blizzak 6 lasted 7.4% longer in the wear tests (4 tests) | 3 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Blizzak 6 by 1.3 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating9 and 37 reviews | 88% | The Blizzak 6 by 5 points | 83% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 75% | The Blizzak 6 by 4 points | 71% |
| Pricein the 6 tests that listed prices | +26.4% | The Blizzak 6 was dearer in 6 of 6 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 193 | 52 sizes made in both | 75 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 8 tests, 2024 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Blizzak 6 | Field | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 20 | P5 of 20 | |
| 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets | P5 of 50 | P7 of 50 | |
| 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 9 | P8 of 9 | |
| 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P6 of 51 | P12 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 31 | P7 of 31 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 20 | P8 of 20 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P1 of 55 | P16 of 55 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 8 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Blizzak 6
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Blizzak 6
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Blizzak 6
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Blizzak 6 88% from 9 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 83% from 37. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Blizzak 6 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.64 | 1.5% | 45.36 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 114.5 | 2% | 112.3 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 23.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 42.35 | 5.6% | 44.78 | 8-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36.5 | 10.3% | 40.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78.63 | 2.4% | 76.82 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 16.7% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.38 | 7.1% | 5.12 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.41 | 1.9% | 12.65 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.18 | 3.2% | 82.7 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.85 | 3.3% | 2.95 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26.36 | 2.6% | 25.68 | 0-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,097 | 1.7% | 2,135 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65.05 | 1.1% | 65.78 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 14.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.32 | 2% | 3.39 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.2 | 3.6% | 16.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9.4% | scored | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.2 | 0.6 dB | 70.62 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51,838 | 7.4% | 48,445 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.29 | 2.7% | 8.52 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62 | 3.1% | 64 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Blizzak 6 scores 9.4 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
| Blizzak 6 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | Dry | 34 | ||
| 92 | Wet | 72 | ||
| 49 | Comfort | 55 | ||
| 67 | Value | 51 | ||
| 74 | Snow | 90 | ||
| 61 | Ice | 20 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Blizzak 6 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 8.7 | Road Feedback | 8.2 | ||
| 8.9 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 8.3 | Wear | 8.5 | ||
| 8.6 | Comfort | 8.8 | ||
| 9.1 | Snow Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 9.1 | Ice Grip | 8.1 | ||
Owners rate the Blizzak 6 88% from 9 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 83% from 37. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
- 88%from 9 reviews
- 75%would buy again
- 75,369 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 delivers excellent winter performance, with strong grip on snow and ice and confident climbing and cornering in cold, mountain conditions. Multiple reviewers describe it as very stable and among the best winter tyres they've used. Overall sentiment is strongly positive across all reviews.
- Strong grip on snow and ice
- Confident traction in cold/mountain conditions
- Stable, secure feel
- High overall satisfaction as a winter tyre
Summarised by AI from 5 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 9 Blizzak 6 reviewsI might be one of the first people to buy Bridgestone winter tires and I've never regretted it. I used them for 2 years, and now I'm thinking of switching to all-season tires, so I'll be looking for other options. After 40,000 km, the insides of the rear tires wore out; I think it's related to the alignment and balance, so I'll be replacing them.
Kleber Krisalp HP3
- 83%from 37 reviews
- 71%would buy again
- 479,168 milesdriven by reviewers
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tyre, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
- snow traction and braking
- wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- low noise/comfort for a winter tyre
- good wear and value
- soft sidewalls/boat-like feel; weak handling precision when pushed
- dry grip/cornering weaker vs summer tyres
- ice/slush performance can be limited at higher speeds
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 37 Krisalp HP3 reviewsGreat snow and ice grip, much better than any winter tire i had before.
Good durability as well. Dry grip is fine, wet grip not as much and must be kept in mind. Not very noisy for a winter tire either. Would buy again if they are on discount.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 193 sizes of the Blizzak 6 and 75 of the Krisalp HP3, 52 of them made in both.
| Category | Blizzak 6 | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 193 sizes, 16 to 22 inch | 75 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 52 sizes 195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16215/65 R16225/55 R16205/40 R17and 40 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B100% | B90%C10% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C75%B25% | D50%C48%B2% |
| EU label noise | 70-75 dB B87%A13% | 68-71 dB A81%B19% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 275 of 275 | 112 of 112 |
| On the market since | - | 2016 |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (2019) | Kleber Krisalp HP2 (2013) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Blizzak 6 was the dearer tyre in 6 of the 6 tests that listed prices, by 26.4% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Previous generation: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3 (16 shared tests)
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a classic “wet-road all-rounder vs snow specialist” winter-tyre match-up. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 (premium-touring) repeatedly places near the top of large group tests, while the Kleber Krisalp HP3 (touring, Michelin's secondary brand) tends to trade overall balance for standout performance on packed snow.
Across seven shared professional comparisons in multiple sizes (205/55 R16 through 245/45 R19), the pattern is strikingly consistent: Blizzak 6 dominates wet braking (7 wins from 7) and is generally stronger on dry-road control, whereas Krisalp HP3 wins snow braking in every shared test (7 from 7) and often looks most at home when the road stays white rather than merely cold and wet. The question is less “which is better?” and more “which winter do you actually drive in most days?”
Conclusion
Looking across the shared tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 is the safer, more rounded choice for typical European winter use where cold wet tarmac is the norm. It consistently stops shorter on wet roads-with meaningful gaps in some tests (e.g., 32.4 m vs 35.4 m in sport auto, and 34.6 m vs 37.8 m in the 55-tyre braking test)-and it also carries an advantage in dry braking/handling metrics in every test that reports them. Those strengths translate into more predictable day-to-day security: shorter “oh no” stopping distances in rain and more composed responses on clear but cold roads.
The Kleber Krisalp HP3, by contrast, is repeatedly validated as a snow-conditions specialist. It wins snow braking in all seven shared comparisons (often by 1-8%), adds strong snow traction and slalom/handling results in the tests that measured them, and it commonly resists straight-line aquaplaning better (4 wins out of 4 where reported). The downside is that multiple sources flag wet braking and wet/dry cornering precision as the compromise that can drag its overall ranking down (e.g., 8th/9 in sport auto despite leading snow braking).
Practical takeaway: if your winter is mostly wet, salted and variable-and you want the tyre that consistently performs closest to “normal tyre” behavior-the Blizzak 6 earns its premium status. If you regularly drive in mountainous regions or consistently snow-covered areas and want maximum confidence on packed snow (even if wet stopping distances aren't class-leading), the Krisalp HP3's snow-first tuning makes sense, especially when price/value is a deciding factor.
Blizzak 6 vs Krisalp HP3: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 or the Kleber Krisalp HP3 the better tyre?
In the 8 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 7 times and the Krisalp HP3 not once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Blizzak 6 scores 9.4 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Blizzak 6 or the Krisalp HP3?
The Blizzak 6 led 20 of the 28 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.6% shorter in the wet across 8 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Blizzak 6 led 9 of the 10 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 18 of the 22 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.6% shorter on snow across 8 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Blizzak 6 lasted 7.4% longer in the wear tests (4 tests) and had 2.7% lower rolling resistance (4 tests). Owners rate wear 8.3/10 for the Blizzak 6 and 8.5/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Krisalp HP3 was 0.6 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the Blizzak 6 and 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Blizzak 6 88% from 9 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 83% from 37. 75% of Blizzak 6 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the Blizzak 6 was the dearer tyre in 6 of them, by 26.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Blizzak 6 is made in 193 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Krisalp HP3 in 75 (14 to 20 inch). 52 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Blizzak 6 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Krisalp HP3 B and D.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
14-2 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
5-9 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Alpin 7
5-5 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion