Menu

Toyo Celsius AS2 vs Vredestein Quatrac

This head-to-head pits two premium all-season touring staples with very different priorities: Toyo's Celsius AS2 and Vredestein's Quatrac. Across 10 shared tests from 2022-2025, the Quatrac consistently finished near the front (10/10 comparative wins), while the Celsius AS2 typically sat mid-to-lower midfield but repeatedly excelled in efficiency and longevity metrics.

The pattern is clear: Vredestein delivers class-leading safety in the wet and strong winter confidence, often stopping 6-14% shorter in wet braking and carrying higher speeds in wet handling and aquaplaning tests. Toyo counters with far lower running costs-projected mileage advantages of 16-44% and better rolling resistance-making it the economical cruiser for high-mileage drivers.
Celsius-AS2 VS Quatrac

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been ten tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of ten total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Vredestein Quatracten
ten wins

While it might look like the Vredestein Quatrac is better than the Toyo Celsius AS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Excellent longevity and abrasion performance (often 15-44% longer projected mileage)
  • Lower rolling resistance and better fuel economy in multiple tests
  • Good aquaplaning resistance, occasionally best in curved/straight tests
  • Strong value/cost-per-1,000 km versus competitors
  • Class-leading wet braking (6-14% shorter) and wet handling
  • Confident winter performance (better snow traction/handling)
  • Quieter road manners and more precise steering feel
  • Consistently high overall test rankings and balanced all-weather ability

Dry Braking

Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 1.55% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
41.37M
Vredestein Quatrac
40.73M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
43.5M (+1.8M)
Vredestein Quatrac
41.7M
Toyo Celsius AS2
43.5M (+1.8M)
Vredestein Quatrac
41.7M
Toyo Celsius AS2
41.1M (+1.01M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40.09M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.9M (+0.6M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40.3M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.9M (+0.6M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40.3M
Toyo Celsius AS2
43.2M (+1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
42.2M
Toyo Celsius AS2
39.9M
Vredestein Quatrac
40.2M (+0.3M)
Toyo Celsius AS2
39.9M
Vredestein Quatrac
40.2M (+0.3M)
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.4M (+0.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40.3M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.4M (+0.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40.3M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 1.23% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
77.2s
Vredestein Quatrac
76.25s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
77.2s (+0.95s)
Vredestein Quatrac
76.25s

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.93% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
93.08Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
93.95Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
91.8Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
93.1Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
87.9Km/H (-1.1Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
89Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
94.1Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
94.3Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
98.5Km/H (-0.9Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
99.4Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac scored 5.26% more points than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
90 Points
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
90 Points (-5 Points)
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during ten wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 9.29% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
49.64M
Vredestein Quatrac
45.03M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
53.2M (+6.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
47.1M
Toyo Celsius AS2
53.2M (+6.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
47.1M
Toyo Celsius AS2
32.4M (+0.72M)
Vredestein Quatrac
31.68M
Toyo Celsius AS2
50.6M (+5.2M)
Vredestein Quatrac
45.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
50.6M (+5.2M)
Vredestein Quatrac
45.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
36.4M (+1.4M)
Vredestein Quatrac
35M
Toyo Celsius AS2
59M (+3.6M)
Vredestein Quatrac
55.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
59M (+3.6M)
Vredestein Quatrac
55.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
51M (+7.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
43.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
51M (+7.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
43.9M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 7.19% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
43.1M
Vredestein Quatrac
40M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
43.1M (+3.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
40M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 3.09% faster around a wet lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
61.08s
Vredestein Quatrac
59.19s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
61.08s (+1.89s)
Vredestein Quatrac
59.19s

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 5.97% faster around a wet lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
70.83Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
75.33Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
70.9Km/H (-3.6Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
74.5Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
70.8Km/H (-5.3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
76.1Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
68.6Km/H (-6.6Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
75.2Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
73Km/H (-2.5Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
75.5Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac scored 7.37% more points than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
88 Points
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
88 Points (-7 Points)
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 4.76% faster around a wet circle than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
12.39s
Vredestein Quatrac
11.8s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
12.6s (+0.57s)
Vredestein Quatrac
12.03s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.26s (+0.64s)
Vredestein Quatrac
11.62s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.26s (+0.71s)
Vredestein Quatrac
11.55s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.45s (+0.45s)
Vredestein Quatrac
12s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac floated at a 0.62% higher speed than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
79.58Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
80.08Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
82.3Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
81.4Km/H (-0.9Km/H)
Toyo Celsius AS2
89Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
89.4Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
78.6Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
79.2Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
78.4Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
78.7Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
74.7Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
75Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
74.5Km/H (-2.3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
76.8Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 slipped out at a 1.22% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
3.27m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.23m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
3.7m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.18m/sec2 (-0.52m/sec2)
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.31m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.27m/sec2 (-0.04m/sec2)
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.3m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.3m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.24m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.24m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
2.79m/sec2 (-0.39m/sec2)
Vredestein Quatrac
3.18m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during five snow braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 2.22% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
22.51M
Vredestein Quatrac
22.01M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
29M (+0.7M)
Vredestein Quatrac
28.3M
Toyo Celsius AS2
19.84M (+0.19M)
Vredestein Quatrac
19.65M
Toyo Celsius AS2
23.9M (+0.8M)
Vredestein Quatrac
23.1M
Toyo Celsius AS2
11.7M (+0.1M)
Vredestein Quatrac
11.6M
Toyo Celsius AS2
25.5M (+1.4M)
Vredestein Quatrac
24.1M
Toyo Celsius AS2
25.1M
Vredestein Quatrac
25.3M (+0.2M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac accelerated 8.5% faster than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
6.47s
Vredestein Quatrac
5.92s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
6.47s (+0.55s)
Vredestein Quatrac
5.92s

Snow Traction

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during five snow traction tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac had 7.26% better snow traction than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
1953.68N
Vredestein Quatrac
2106.52N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
2246N (-154N)
Vredestein Quatrac
2400N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2410N (-190N)
Vredestein Quatrac
2600N
Toyo Celsius AS2
191.4N (-26.2N)
Vredestein Quatrac
217.6N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2355N (-250N)
Vredestein Quatrac
2605N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2566N (-144N)
Vredestein Quatrac
2710N

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.61% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
88.6s
Vredestein Quatrac
86.29s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
88.6s (+2.31s)
Vredestein Quatrac
86.29s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.99% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
52.9Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
54.53Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
55.5Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
55.9Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
55.5Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
57.1Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
50Km/H (-3Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
53Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
50.6Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Vredestein Quatrac
52.1Km/H

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac scored 3.16% more points than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
92 Points
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
92 Points (-3 Points)
Vredestein Quatrac
95 Points

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac provided 4.13% more lateral grip than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
3.48ms/2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.63ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
3.48ms/2 (-0.15ms/2)
Vredestein Quatrac
3.63ms/2

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 1.75% faster through a slalom than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
3.93m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
4m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
4.12m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
4.12m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.9m/sec2 (-0.02m/sec2)
Vredestein Quatrac
3.92m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.78m/sec2 (-0.19m/sec2)
Vredestein Quatrac
3.97m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle 3.77% shorter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
21.2M
Vredestein Quatrac
20.4M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
21.2M (+0.8M)
Vredestein Quatrac
20.4M

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac scored 2.17% more points than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
90 Points
Vredestein Quatrac
92 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
90 Points (-2 Points)
Vredestein Quatrac
92 Points

Noise

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during five noise tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac measured 1.07% quieter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
72.62dB
Vredestein Quatrac
71.84dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
72.6dB (+0.5dB)
Vredestein Quatrac
72.1dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
73.3dB (+0.4dB)
Vredestein Quatrac
72.9dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
71.5dB (+0.4dB)
Vredestein Quatrac
71.1dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
72.7dB (+0.9dB)
Vredestein Quatrac
71.8dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
73dB (+1.7dB)
Vredestein Quatrac
71.3dB

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three tyre weight tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac weighed 6.58% less than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
2806.3Kg
Vredestein Quatrac
2621.57Kg
Tyre Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tyre Weight: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
8373Kg (+553Kg)
Vredestein Quatrac
7820Kg
Toyo Celsius AS2
37.5Kg (+1Kg)
Vredestein Quatrac
36.5Kg
Toyo Celsius AS2
8.4Kg (+0.2Kg)
Vredestein Quatrac
8.2Kg

Wear

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during five wear tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 is predicted to cover 20.07% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
59647.6KM
Vredestein Quatrac
47675.2KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
62356KM
Vredestein Quatrac
46295KM (-16061KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
56012KM
Vredestein Quatrac
43091KM (-12921KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
50200KM
Vredestein Quatrac
48000KM (-2200KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
63870KM
Vredestein Quatrac
55140KM (-8730KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
65800KM
Vredestein Quatrac
45850KM (-19950KM)

Value

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during four value tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 proved to have a 30.09% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
6.39Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
9.14Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
5.53Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
8.75Price/1000 (+3.22Price/1000)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.05Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
9.75Price/1000 (+2.7Price/1000)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.36Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
9.34Price/1000 (+1.98Price/1000)
Toyo Celsius AS2
5.62Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
8.72Price/1000 (+3.1Price/1000)

Price

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one price tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 cost 11.33% less than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
207.79
Vredestein Quatrac
234.33
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
345
Vredestein Quatrac
405 (+60)
Toyo Celsius AS2
70.57 (+6.92)
Vredestein Quatrac
63.65

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 had a 4.02% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
7.87kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
8.2kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
7.77kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
7.88kg / t (+0.11kg / t)
Toyo Celsius AS2
8.35kg / t (+0.34kg / t)
Vredestein Quatrac
8.01kg / t
Toyo Celsius AS2
8.1kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
8.27kg / t (+0.17kg / t)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.38kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
8.1kg / t (+0.72kg / t)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.76kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
8.74kg / t (+0.98kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 used 0.37% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
5.34l/100km
Vredestein Quatrac
5.36l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
5.59l/100km (+0.03l/100km)
Vredestein Quatrac
5.56l/100km
Toyo Celsius AS2
5.58l/100km
Vredestein Quatrac
5.78l/100km (+0.2l/100km)
Toyo Celsius AS2
5.41l/100km (+0.21l/100km)
Vredestein Quatrac
5.2l/100km
Toyo Celsius AS2
4.77l/100km
Vredestein Quatrac
4.91l/100km (+0.14l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac emitted 5.43% less particle wear matter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Toyo Celsius AS2
18.4Gram/1000km
Vredestein Quatrac
17.4Gram/1000km
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (Gram/1000km), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Quatrac

Toyo Celsius AS2
18.4Gram/1000km (+1Gram/1000km)
Vredestein Quatrac
17.4Gram/1000km

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 lost 28.59% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Toyo Celsius AS2
707g
Vredestein Quatrac
990g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Toyo Celsius AS2

Toyo Celsius AS2
541g
Vredestein Quatrac
669g (+128g)
Toyo Celsius AS2
873g
Vredestein Quatrac
1311g (+438g)

Real World Driver Reviews

Toyo Celsius AS2 Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Toyo Celsius AS2 for excellent comfort, low noise, and confident grip in wet and dry, with several noting stable snow performance for an all-season. A few report a softer, slightly spongy feel and average handling focus, and one low-scoring review found wet/snow performance uninspiring. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with comfort and quietness as standout strengths.

Based on 5 reviews with an average rating of 79%

Vredestein Quatrac Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Quatrac for excellent wet grip, strong snow and cold-weather traction, and impressive tread life, with many noting quiet, comfortable cruising. Handling in the dry is generally good, though a few find it less engaging than top summer options and mention elevated noise on some cars. A small minority report poor wet/dry grip or noise concerns, but high-scoring reviews emphasize balanced all-season performance and value. Overall, the Quatrac delivers dependable year-round capability with standout wet performance and durability.

Based on 28 reviews with an average rating of 82%

Best Review for the Toyo Celsius AS2
Given 48% 225/45 R17 on a combination of roads for 16,000 easy going miles
Pretty uninspiring tire. It does everything ok but didn't seem great in the wet or snow.
Helpful 1052 - tyre reviewed on August 25, 2023
View all Toyo Celsius AS2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Quatrac
Given 77% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 7 spirited miles
They grip surprisingly well for an all season tire in the dry and snow. I have these mounted on a 8th generation Honda civic sedan with the r18 engine and these tires have me absolutely glued to the ground. I replaced my old Goodyear eagle "all season" tire which had the snow performance of a summer tire in the snow and didn't even preform well in wet or dry. But back to the vredestein, I once was screwing around (dry, 65°f) taking a highway exchang ramp a bit too fast, I hit one rather sharp bend at probably 55+mph and didn't break traction for a second, no tire squeal or anything. Another... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1347 - tyre reviewed on May 4, 2024
View all Vredestein Quatrac driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If you drive in frequent rain or mixed conditions and value safety margins, the Vredestein Quatrac is the standout. It dominates wet braking in every shared test, handles more precisely on wet and snow, runs quieter, and typically ranks near the top overall. Its trade-off is higher wear and total cost over time.

The Toyo Celsius AS2 is the value and efficiency play. It posts excellent mileage, lower rolling resistance, and stronger cost-per-1,000 km, making it ideal for high annual mileage, milder climates, or budget-focused ownership. However, its extended wet stopping distances and modest snow traction mean you sacrifice safety reserves in challenging weather. In short: Quatrac for performance and safety; Celsius AS2 for low cost of ownership.
Key Differences
  • Wet safety: Quatrac stops markedly shorter in every wet braking test (up to ~14%).
  • Handling: Quatrac is faster and more stable in wet and snow; Toyo under/oversteers earlier.
  • Winter grip: Quatrac leads in snow traction/handling; Toyo only edges an occasional snow metric.
  • Noise/comfort: Quatrac runs quieter and scores higher subjectively.
  • Wear and cost: Toyo delivers 16-44% higher projected mileage and better value metrics.
  • Efficiency: Toyo typically has lower rolling resistance; Quatrac sometimes consumes slightly more fuel.
Vredestein Quatrac

Overall Winner: Vredestein Quatrac

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Quatrac has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.