Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 173
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 15
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 9 times and the Quatrac Pro+ not once. The CrossClimate 2 had 14.8% lower rolling resistance; the Quatrac Pro+ stopped 2.6% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Michelin CrossClimate 2 for mixed climates with real winter, maximum all-round safety, and better efficiency/long-term costs. Choose Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus if you drive mainly in mild, rainy conditions, prioritize wet grip, and want a lower upfront price.
Where the CrossClimate 2 is stronger
- Class-leading snow performance (braking, traction, handling, and ice braking/traction)
- Shortest dry braking across all tests
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
The measured tallies (wins out of measurements in the shared tests) come straight from the tables below. The written verdict and bullet points are analysis of those tests and of owner reviews; where they and the figures disagree, the figures are right.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac Pro+ at a glance
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won9 shared tests | 9 | 0 | |
| Dry18 measurements | 14 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 9.4% shorter in the dry (9 tests) | 3 |
| Wet38 measurements | 19 | Level between the two. | 19 |
| Snow30 measurements | 30 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 7% shorter on snow (9 tests) | 0 |
| Ice3 measurements | 3 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 11.5% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort11 measurements | 5 | 6 | |
| Value10 measurements | 10 | The CrossClimate 2 had 14.8% lower rolling resistance (7 tests) | 0 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The CrossClimate 2 by 1.4 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating173 and 15 reviews | 80% | Too close to call | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 73% | The Quatrac Pro+ by 6 points | 79% |
| Pricein the 8 tests that listed prices | +24.2% | The CrossClimate 2 was dearer in 8 of 8 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 116 | 62 sizes made in both | 103 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 9 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate 2 | Field | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | P2 of 7 | P4 of 7 | |
| 2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 10 | P7 of 10 | |
| 2025 Mid Range All Season Tyre Test | P2 of 6 | P5 of 6 | |
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P5 of 16 | P9 of 16 | |
| 2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tyre Test | P2 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2024 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | P4 of 6 | P6 of 6 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | P6 of 10 | P7 of 10 | |
| The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 / 2025 | P2 of 6 | P5 of 6 | |
| 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | P2 of 9 | P6 of 9 |
Performance profile
19 measurements from the 9 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate 2
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | CrossClimate 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38.22 | 9.4% | 42.2 | 9-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 99.53 | 0.1% | 99.7 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 96.08 | 0.1% | 96.05 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 6.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.17 | 2.6% | 37.96 | 2-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26.59 | 0.9% | 26.84 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40.5 | 2% | 39.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91.57 | 1.9% | 89.69 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74.65 | 1.7% | 75.98 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15.2 | 0.9% | 15.04 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 79.49 | 4.6% | 76.31 | 7-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.43 | 7.6% | 2.26 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20.63 | 7% | 22.18 | 9-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.26 | 11.3% | 5.93 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,660 | 10.4% | 2,420 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.24 | 3.9% | 80.35 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.38 | 5.1% | 51.75 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 25% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 17.6% | 3.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.05 | 12.9% | 3.59 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.36 | 11.5% | 13.94 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.7 | 14.1% | 5.47 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 13.9% | scored | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.88 | 0.2 dB | 71.04 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 47,500 | 2.2% | 46,500 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.31 | 14.8% | 8.6 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 3.4% | 5.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53 | 32.1% | 78 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | Dry | 50 | ||
| 75 | Wet | 79 | ||
| 82 | Comfort | 66 | ||
| 84 | Value | 27 | ||
| 94 | Snow | 38 | ||
| 47 | Ice | 8 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| CrossClimate 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 7.9 | Wet Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 8.7 | ||
| 7.5 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 7.1 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 8.1 | ||
| 8.4 | Snow Grip | 7.6 | ||
| 7.5 | Ice Grip | 6.8 | ||
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
- 80%from 173 reviews
- 73%would buy again
- 2,411,545 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Michelin CrossClimate 2 highly, most often praising its dependable all-weather grip with standout snow traction and strong dry and wet grip for an all-season tyre. Comfort is commonly reported as very good and a sizeable minority also find it quiet, though road noise is a recurring talking point with roughly one in eight owners complaining it can hum or rumble. The main consistent drawback is efficiency: around one in seven owners report noticeably worse fuel economy/EV range (rolling resistance). A smaller but meaningful group also criticise wet handling confidence, particularly when pushed, even though straight-line wet grip and aquaplaning resistance tend to be viewed positively.
- Excellent snow traction and winter security
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Confident wet grip in everyday driving
- Good ride comfort over longer distances
- Noticeable hit to fuel economy/EV range (higher rolling resistance)
- Wet handling can feel nervous or lack confidence when cornering/braking
- Can be louder than expected on certain surfaces or at speed
Summarised by AI from 153 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 173 CrossClimate 2 reviewsAfter 2 hot summers the tires are dangerous on wet and cold,
That was actually very much appreciated since i drive them on a GR Yaris mostly on the weekends in the night on snowfall but normal use would be very very dangerous.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- 81%from 15 reviews
- 79%would buy again
- 98,850 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners are broadly pleased with the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus, with 12 of 14 reviews scoring it positively and an average owner rating of 80.9%. The most consistent strengths are strong wet grip and reassuring all-round traction, with many also highlighting confident dry grip and capable performance in snow. A meaningful minority (around one in five) report a softer, less precise steering feel and a tyre that needs a longer bedding-in period, and a similar share raise concerns over tread life or durability.
- Excellent wet grip, even in cold and wet conditions
- Strong dry grip with confidence for spirited driving
- Surprisingly capable snow traction
- Predictable dry handling
- Softer, less precise steering feel/feedback
- Noticeable bedding-in period before it feels at its best
- Reduced margin at the limit or a slight delay finding grip under load
Summarised by AI from 14 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 15 Quatrac Pro+ reviews"I purchased these all-season premium tires for my 4WD Subaru Outback, and I am extremely satisfied with them. As soon as they were installed, the car felt remarkably smooth and pleasant to drive.
The tires are wearing perfectly evenly, and I’ve already rotated them once. I used to be hesitant about all-season tires, but this brand completely convinced me that I made the right choice. While tire selection always depends on the specific car, driving style, and usage, these have worked out incredibly well for my Outback. Highly recommended!
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 116 sizes of the CrossClimate 2 and 103 of the Quatrac Pro+, 62 of them made in both.
| Category | CrossClimate 2 | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 116 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 103 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 62 sizes 205/40 R17205/45 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17215/40 R17215/45 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17215/65 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17and 50 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B81%C19% | B99%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C55%B33%D11%A1% | C64%B20%D15%E1% |
| EU label noise | 69-73 dB B78%A22% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 176 of 176 | 139 of 139 |
| On the market since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Replaced | Michelin CrossClimate+ (2017) | - |
| Replaced by | Michelin CrossClimate 3 | - |
| Awards | Winner: Best All-Season Tyres (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: All-Season SUV Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2024) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2023) Winner: All-Season SUV Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2022) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2022) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tyre in 8 of the 8 tests that listed prices, by 24.2% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two of the most talked-about all-season options against each other: Michelin's premium-touring CrossClimate 2 and Vredestein's value-focused Quatrac Pro Plus. Across nine shared professional tests from 2023-2025, the Michelin consistently finishes higher overall and sweeps key winter and efficiency metrics, while the Vredestein counters with class-leading wet grip and competitive pricing.
Drivers will see a clear philosophy split. The CrossClimate 2 delivers benchmark snow traction, shorter dry stops, strong aquaplaning resistance, and low rolling resistance. The Quatrac Pro Plus prioritizes wet braking and handling-often topping Michelin in pure wet grip-though it trails in snow, dry braking, and fuel efficiency. If you face real winters, the gap becomes meaningful; in milder, rainy climates, Vredestein's strengths are more compelling.
Conclusion
Across the test set, Michelin dominates the categories that most affect year-round security and cost of ownership: best-in-class snow performance (wins in all snow braking/traction/handling comparisons), universally shorter dry braking, and consistently lower rolling resistance with better abrasion. Its occasional weakness is wet handling versus the Vredestein, but it compensates with superior straight and curved aquaplaning resistance and generally safe wet braking.
Vredestein's case rests on confident wet grip and balanced manners on damp roads at a lower price, but it concedes too much in snow performance, dry stopping distances, and efficiency (rolling resistance) to overturn Michelin overall. For mixed climates with real winter episodes or anyone valuing all-round safety and economy, choose the CrossClimate 2. For predominantly mild, rainy regions where wet dynamics matter most and budget is tighter, the Quatrac Pro Plus is a sensible, mid-range alternative.
CrossClimate 2 vs Quatrac Pro+: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ the better tyre?
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 9 times and the Quatrac Pro+ not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate 2 or the Quatrac Pro+?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 19-19 between the CrossClimate 2 and the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 led 14 of the 18 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 9.4% shorter in the dry across 9 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 led 30 of the 30 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7% shorter on snow across 9 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate 2 had 14.8% lower rolling resistance (7 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 7.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the CrossClimate 2 and 8.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. 73% of CrossClimate 2 owners would buy it again, against 79% for the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is more expensive?
In the 8 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tyre in 8 of them, by 24.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate 2 is made in 116 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac Pro+ in 103 (17 to 22 inch). 62 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac Pro+ B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Quatrac Pro+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the CrossClimate 2 in 2020. The CrossClimate 2 replaced the Michelin CrossClimate+.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3-9 in 12 shared tests
vs
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion