Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 finished ahead 2 times and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun not once. The Ecsta HS51 was stronger in dry and wet, the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun in comfort.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ecsta HS51
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Ecsta HS51
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ecsta HS51
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Ecsta HS51 79% from 42 reviews and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Ecsta HS51 | Gap | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Ecsta HS51 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 34.8 | 2.8% | 35.8 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 96 | 0.2% | 95.8 | 1-0 |
| Wet Ecsta HS51 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 38.95 | 3.2% | 40.25 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 78.8 | 3.4% | 76.2 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 85.5 | 2.8% | 83.2 | 1-0 |
| Comfort ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 68.7 | 0.3 dB | 68.4 | 0-1 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 42,160 | 20.4% | 35,020 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.31 | 3.7% | 8.97 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ecsta HS51 | Field | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | P1 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | P3 of 53 | P8 of 53 |
Ecsta HS51 vs ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: your questions
Is the Kumho Ecsta HS51 or the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 finished ahead 2 times and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ecsta HS51 scores 8 and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ecsta HS51 or the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
The Ecsta HS51 led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.2% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ecsta HS51 led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.8% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.2/10 for the Ecsta HS51 and 7.9/10 for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ecsta HS51 79% from 42 reviews and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119. 67% of Ecsta HS51 owners would buy it again, against 78% for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Which is the newer tyre?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is the newer design: it reached the market in 2017, the Ecsta HS51 in 2013. The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun replaced the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
3-5 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
8-2 in 12 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3-13 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N Fera Primus
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
17-2 in 19 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.