Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Expect a clear contrast: the PremiumContact 7 dominates wet and dry grip with repeatedly shorter braking distances and sharper handling, whereas the ZE310 EcoRun tends to be quieter, more comfortable, and stronger in both straight-line and curved aquaplaning, often at a meaningfully lower purchase price.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | seven |
While it might look like the Continental PremiumContact 7 is better than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet and dry braking (e.g., up to ~8-13% shorter in wet vs Falken across tests)
- Precise, confidence-inspiring handling with strong steering feedback
- Good wear and abrasion performance (e.g., +19-30% projected mileage in key tests)
- Competitive rolling resistance for the class
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (often wins straight and curved tests)
- Low cabin noise and good comfort/refinement
- Lower purchase price and solid value scores
- Decent dry dynamics for everyday driving when not pushed
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 4.19% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 1.09% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 0.1% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 10% more points than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 8.18% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 11.85% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 1.94% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 1.53% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 5% more points than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 had 6.13% higher lateral wet grip than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun floated at a 1.07% higher speed than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Straight Aqua: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun slipped out at a 7.41% higher speed than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scored 8% more points than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun measured 0.59% quieter than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun measured 1.39% quieter than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two wear tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 is predicted to cover 20.81% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Wear: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one value tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun proved to have a 9.49% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Value: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three price tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun cost 22.03% less than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Price: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 had a 2.84% lower rolling resistance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 used 1.67% less fuel than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 emitted 16.53% less particle wear matter than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Best In Abrasion: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental PremiumContact 7 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Continental PremiumContact 7 overwhelmingly praise its outstanding wet and dry grip, strong braking, and confidence-inspiring handling, often noting clear improvements over the PC6. Many also report solid comfort and better aquaplaning resistance, though experiences vary by car. The most frequent drawbacks are higher road noise on coarse asphalt and, for a subset of users, faster tread wear; a few enthusiasts note soft sidewalls that reduce steering precision. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high number of top-scoring reviews.
Based on 48 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Driver Reviews
Across 104 reviews, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is most often described as a strong value summer tyre with confident wet and dry grip (including good aquaplaning resistance) and notably low road noise. Many drivers also praise its predictable, safe handling and generally good wear for the money, with a high rate of repeat purchases. The main recurring downside is higher rolling resistance leading to increased fuel consumption, and some users note a softer sidewall/less sharp steering response that makes it feel less sporty or a bit vague when pushed.
Based on 113 reviews with an average rating of 80%
Very silent. Most silent tyres I had the last 20 years.
Nice handling.
Cheaper than most other brands.
(30euro cheaper than dunlop and 50 euro cheaper than michelin)
Euro label - C A A 67db for 195 65 15
Conclusion
For drivers prioritizing braking performance and confidence in mixed weather, the Continental is the clear winner. Budget-focused buyers who value quietness and high aquaplaning margins on straight or curved water may find the Falken acceptable, provided they accept longer stopping distances and older-generation efficiency. If value means performance per pound, the Continental's superior grip and longevity often justify the premium; if sticker price and comfort rule, the Falken remains a sensible, but compromised, alternative.
Key Differences
- Safety-critical braking: Continental consistently stops shorter in wet and dry (often 4-12% advantage).
- Handling precision: Continental offers sharper steering and higher limit stability; Falken can understeer and respond slower in the wet.
- Aquaplaning: Falken typically leads in both straight and curved aquaplaning; Continental ranges from competitive to average.
- Noise/comfort: Falken is quieter and more refined; Continental can be noisier on rough surfaces.
- Wear/longevity: Continental shows notably better tread life (e.g., +19-30% mileage in major tests).
- Price/value: Falken is usually cheaper upfront; Continental offsets with superior safety performance and durability.
Overall Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental PremiumContact 7 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.