Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE320
Ahead in each discipline
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and the Falken ZIEX ZE320 have met in one independent test so far, and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead. The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was stronger in wet and value, the ZIEX ZE320 in dry.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
EfficientGrip Performance 2
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the ZIEX ZE320 87% from 17. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | ZIEX ZE320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry ZIEX ZE320 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 36.3 | 6.6% | 33.9 |
| Wet EfficientGrip Performance 2 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 31.3 | 8.7% | 34.3 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 38.1 | 1% | 37.7 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 75.7 | 0.7% | 75.2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.4 | 9.7% | 3.1 |
| Value EfficientGrip Performance 2 ahead | |||
| Wear km | 57,800 | 54.1% | 37,500 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.5 | 1.8% | 5.6 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 62 | 12.7% | 71 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Field | ZIEX ZE320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P3 of 16 | P5 of 16 |
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs ZIEX ZE320: your questions
Is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Falken ZIEX ZE320 the better tyre?
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and the Falken ZIEX ZE320 have met in one independent test so far, and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the ZIEX ZE320 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the ZIEX ZE320?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 led 3 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The ZIEX ZE320 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.5/10 for the ZIEX ZE320.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the ZIEX ZE320 87% from 17. 81% of EfficientGrip Performance 2 owners would buy it again, against 80% for the ZIEX ZE320.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 is made in 37 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the ZIEX ZE320 in 53 (15 to 18 inch). 24 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is graded A for wet grip and A for rolling resistance in most sizes; the ZIEX ZE320 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3-13 in 16 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Falken ZIEX ZE320
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
2-5 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the EfficientGrip Performance 2 Review the ZIEX ZE320
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.