Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 4 times and the Intensa UHP 2 once. The Intensa UHP 2 was stronger in comfort and value, the Advan Sport V107 in dry and wet.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Intensa UHP 2
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Intensa UHP 2
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Intensa UHP 2
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Intensa UHP 2 78% from 57 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Intensa UHP 2 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Advan Sport V107 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 34.98 | 3.4% | 33.8 | 0-5 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 108.2 | 2.1% | 110.5 | 0-2 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 64.2% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Advan Sport V107 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 36.38 | 3.8% | 35.08 | 2-3 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 77.05 | 1.9% | 78.5 | 0-2 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 37.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 15.48 | 3.4% | 14.95 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 95.8 | 2.3% | 98 | 0-2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.55 | 1.7% | 3.5 | 1-1 |
| Comfort Intensa UHP 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 72.85 | 0.5 dB | 73.35 | 2-0 |
| Value Intensa UHP 2 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 43,865 | 11.5% | 39,615 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.79 | 22.5% | 10.05 | 2-0 |
| Abrasion g | 1,521 | 15.2% | 1,794 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Intensa UHP 2 | Field | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P19 of 20 | P13 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P20 of 50 | P18 of 50 | |
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | P32 of 52 | P14 of 52 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | P9 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P11 of 50 | P4 of 50 |
Intensa UHP 2 vs Advan Sport V107: your questions
Is the Sava Intensa UHP 2 or the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 the better tyre?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 4 times and the Intensa UHP 2 once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Intensa UHP 2 scores 8.3 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Intensa UHP 2 or the Advan Sport V107?
The Advan Sport V107 led 10 of the 13 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.8% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 8 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.4% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Intensa UHP 2 lasted 11.5% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) and had 22.5% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Intensa UHP 2 and 5.5/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Intensa UHP 2 was 0.5 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the Intensa UHP 2 and 6.3/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Intensa UHP 2 78% from 57 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. 77% of Intensa UHP 2 owners would buy it again, against 54% for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Advan Sport V107 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 15.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Intensa UHP 2 is made in 36 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Advan Sport V107 in 137 (16 to 24 inch). 21 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Intensa UHP 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Advan Sport V107 A and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Intensa UHP 2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Advan Sport V107 in 2018. The Intensa UHP 2 replaced the Sava intensa uhp. The Advan Sport V107 replaced the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-1 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli P Zero PZ5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.