Maxxis Victra Sport 5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 finished ahead 3 times and the Dynaxer UHP twice. The Victra Sport 5 was stronger in dry and wet, the Dynaxer UHP in comfort and value.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Victra Sport 5
Dynaxer UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Victra Sport 5
Dynaxer UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Victra Sport 5
Dynaxer UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Victra Sport 5 78% from 32 reviews and the Dynaxer UHP 80% from 7. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Victra Sport 5 | Gap | Dynaxer UHP | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Victra Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 34.56 | 2.2% | 35.36 | 3-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 117.2 | 1.1% | 115.9 | 3-0 |
| Wet Victra Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 41.64 | 0.4% | 41.24 | 2-3 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 73.9 | 5.2% | 70.27 | 3-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 92.33 | 4.1% | 88.97 | 3-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.08 | 15.7% | 2.69 | 2-0 |
| Comfort Dynaxer UHP ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 72.53 | 0.5 dB | 72 | 1-2 |
| Value Dynaxer UHP ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 28,474 | 33.2% | 37,740 | 0-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9 | 11.1% | 8 | 0-3 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2020 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Victra Sport 5 | Field | Dynaxer UHP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | P13 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P9 of 50 | P20 of 50 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | P7 of 15 | P10 of 15 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | P18 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | P20 of 50 | P13 of 50 |
Victra Sport 5 vs Dynaxer UHP: your questions
Is the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 or the Kleber Dynaxer UHP the better tyre?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 finished ahead 3 times and the Dynaxer UHP twice. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Victra Sport 5 scores 8.8 and the Dynaxer UHP 7.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Victra Sport 5 or the Dynaxer UHP?
The Victra Sport 5 led 10 of the 13 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 15.7% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Victra Sport 5 led 6 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Dynaxer UHP lasted 33.2% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) and had 11.1% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 6.4/10 for the Victra Sport 5 and 7.2/10 for the Dynaxer UHP.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Dynaxer UHP was 0.5 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Victra Sport 5 and 9.6/10 for the Dynaxer UHP.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Victra Sport 5 78% from 32 reviews and the Dynaxer UHP 80% from 7. 68% of Victra Sport 5 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Dynaxer UHP.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Dynaxer UHP was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 12.5% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Victra Sport 5 is made in 36 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Dynaxer UHP in 30 (17 to 20 inch). 22 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Victra Sport 5 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Dynaxer UHP A and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Victra Sport 5 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the Dynaxer UHP in 2017. The Victra Sport 5 replaced the Maxxis Victra Sport VS01.
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.