Menu
Kleber Dynaxer UHP View Gallery (1)
195-255/35-55 R17-20 45 sizes 2017

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Kleber Tyres Ultra High Performance Summer

The Kleber Dynaxer UHP is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
86%
Handling
73%
Wear
72%
Comfort
96%
Buy again
74%
7 Reviews
80% Average
13,000 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 15th)
Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Comfort
88.2
0.32x / 5 tests
Value
76
0.42x / 14 tests
Dry
69.7
1.8x / 11 tests
Wet
67.2
2x / 17 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
75.2
14 tests
Handling
59.9
8 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 2
Period: 2019 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 80.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.28
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 17/21 11 metrics
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 20/48 2 metrics
2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 235/35 R19 10/15 9 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 15/20 10 metrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 13/49 2 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 16/20 11 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 15/45 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
7
Tests
15th
Average
10th
Best
20th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview
225/45 R18 • 2023
20th/48
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
225/45 R18 • 2023
17th/21
Good mileage, low rolling noise, low rolling resistance.
Moderate grip and poor cornering in the wet, low aquaplaning reserves.
2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test
235/35 R19 • 2021
10th/15
Short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, well priced.
Only average wet performance, understeer in the dry.
Satisfactory.
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
215/45R17 91 V XL C A 69
215/45R17 91 Y XL C A 69
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 69
225/45R17 91 W C A 69
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 69
225/45R17 94 Y XL C A 69
225/45R17 91 Y C A 69
225/45R17 94 W XL C A 69
18 inch
225/40R18 92 W XL C A 69
245/45R18 100 W XL C A 69
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 69
255/35R18 94 Y XL C A 69
245/40R18 97 Y XL C A 69
225/40R18 92 Y XL C A 69
245/40R18 93 Y D A 69
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL D A 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP >>

Questions and Answers for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Kleber Dynaxer UHP Reviews

Given 97% while driving a Volkswagen Passat CC (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
After Goodyear F1 Asymmetric 2 I didn't expect that the kleber dynaxer uhp xl would work so well. Excellent tyre in any conditions!
Helpful 1005
November 18, 2021
Given 42% while driving a BMW 330 Ci Sport (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
If you love to drive on curvy roads then this tires is not for you!!! Very bad grip in corners and it gets worst if the asphalt is just wet. Poor braking on dry and wet as well. The good thing is very low noise and soft feeling. So as for comfort I give 10 points. Anyway I will not buy this again in any circumstances because I don`t feel safe at all. Swapped from other low budget General Altimax Sport 225/40 R18 + 255/35 R18 and I would say General is real sport tires compare to Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
Helpful 835
April 14, 2022
Given 80% while driving a Citroën DS4 (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 easy going miles
Fitted again Kleber to my Citroen DS4.Now the new UHP selected. Before i had the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 which were long lasting tyres but a bit noisy. Now the new UHP is closer to the original Michelin Pilot Sport 3. I have done few km with them but they seem to be nice tyres for a medium price. Very good for everyday city driving. Excellent at open roads!
Helpful 944
April 29, 2021

How would you rate the Kleber Dynaxer UHP?

Click a star to start your review

158 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Kleber Dynaxer UHP Reviews

Given 89% while driving a Ford Focus MK1 (215/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
After Nokian Line, Goodyear UG 9, Dunlop SPT Blueresponse, Kleber Dynaher HP3, Fulda Ecocontrol HP at 15 inches, and Falken EW HS01 at 16inches, i went for this Kleber. Must say, i wanted Hankook VP 3, but in this Ford's non standard dimension, i didn't have a choice. Kleber was the only manufacturer with 2021 dot, and with price of 90 euros, pretty expensive. I was a little bit worried, because there is a very small amount of tyre tests and thoughts about this Kleber, but... Tyre is absolutely safe and in one thing especially good, noise. It is very, very quite. In first two days, 800km of mountin roads and highways combined, with havy rain, very good braking (progressive) and handling. Sligtly week in aquaplaning under 95km/h. Dry braking is great, handling too. My Focus is fitted with Eibach Pro Kit springs, and i was expecting worse comfort, but in combination with this tyre, comfort is good, must say. Rolling resistance is small, in comparing to winter Falken. When you switch to sporty driving, it tends to curl in sharper curves, but nothing big or dramatic. For now, can't say anything about wear. For me, this tyre is VERY RECOMENDED.
Helpful 837
May 5, 2021
Given 71% while driving a Skoda Octavia vRS (225/40 R18 V) on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
In my opinion this tire is not good to spirited driving style.
Helpful 834
May 31, 2020
Given 92% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (205/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
After a potenza of either p zero or t1r I didn't expect that mounting the kleber dynaxer uhp xl would work so well. On dry road under pressure it behaves very well. Even in the closed turns of the Greek provincial roads reacts honestly, and I can say that I am surprised. After a lot of pressure at long turns it showed that it was a very good tire. I would like a little better reaction to the steep turns because it leaves me feeling that it is soft on its side. The motorway is very quiet as in the city. The quality of the stain is excellent. In wet it behaves just as well as in dry. In cases of braking it is quite progressive and does not scare. As for consumption it seems to be better. Finally, I can't yet express my opinion on their wear as I do not have several thousand kilometers, but what I have noticed is that its side skirts, after a bending strain, show at least moderate to fairly good wear.
Helpful 1049
March 11, 2020
Given 91% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (205/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 1,000 miles
Unbelievable rubber for the money. Before that I had the Yokohama S Drive which was not XL. The difference is day to night in terms of grip, noise and cornering. Both dry and wet grip is exemplary. The feedback on the steering wheel is accurate and cornering control is to the maximum grade even when I am driving to the limit. In comparison with the Yokohamas, the car was very slippery and had a tend for over-steering. The new rubber pattern combined with the reinforced sidewalls make huge difference in every aspect. Furthermore in situations of intensive braking at high speeds the car slows down really fast. Very important for noise reduction are the thin grooves in the center section of the rubber's pattern, which most summer sports tires do not have. In conclusion it is a complete tire which has nothing to be jealous about in comparison to more expensive and well branded tires. Kleber, of course, did not come out of nowhere. It has a long story in the tire industry with major innovations, and since 1981 has been a part of the Michelin group. "You get what you pay for" is not the case here, as what you get is best and even more for your buck. Strongly recommended with out cutting corners in terms of safety and performance.
Helpful 790
June 29, 2019
Rate the Kleber Dynaxer UHP