Nokian WR A4 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro finished ahead 3 times and the WR A4 not once. The WR A4 was stronger in value, the Wintrac Pro in dry, wet and snow.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
WR A4
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 2 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
WR A4
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
WR A4
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the WR A4 84% from 24 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | WR A4 | Gap | Wintrac Pro | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Wintrac Pro ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 43.15 | 0.9% | 42.75 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 114.5 | 0.5% | 115.1 | 0-2 |
| Wet Wintrac Pro ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 47.8 | 6.7% | 44.4 | 0-3 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 80.8 | 4.2% | 84.3 | 0-2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 71.85 | 13.4% | 80.45 | 0-2 |
| Snow Wintrac Pro ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 26.5 | 0.9% | 26.3 | 1-2 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,883 | 0.5% | 2,869 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 54 | 0.8% | 54.45 | 0-2 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Noise dB | 73.05 | 0.2 dB | 73.2 | 1-1 |
| Value WR A4 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 37,310 | 7.7% | 40,180 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.96 | 16.9% | 9.59 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2019 to 2020
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WR A4 | Field | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | P16 of 20 | P12 of 20 | |
| 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | P12 of 51 | P6 of 51 | |
| 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | P10 of 11 | P2 of 11 |
WR A4 vs Wintrac Pro: your questions
Is the Nokian WR A4 or the Vredestein Wintrac Pro the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro finished ahead 3 times and the WR A4 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WR A4 scores 7.4 and the Wintrac Pro 9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WR A4 or the Wintrac Pro?
The Wintrac Pro led 7 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.7% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Wintrac Pro led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Wintrac Pro led 4 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The WR A4 had 16.9% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.9/10 for the WR A4 and 8.7/10 for the Wintrac Pro.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the WR A4 and 8.7/10 for the Wintrac Pro.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the WR A4 84% from 24 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30. 85% of WR A4 owners would buy it again, against 93% for the Wintrac Pro.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The WR A4 is made in 9 sizes (17 to 21 inch) and the Wintrac Pro in 119 (17 to 22 inch). 7 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the WR A4 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac Pro B and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Wintrac Pro is the newer design: it reached the market in 2018, the WR A4 in 2016. The WR A4 replaced the Nokian WR A3. The Wintrac Pro replaced the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

