Nokian WR Snowproof vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
The Nokian WR Snowproof and the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 have met in one independent test so far, and the Winter I cept RS3 finished ahead. The WR Snowproof was stronger in dry and value, the Winter I cept RS3 in wet, snow, ice and comfort.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
WR Snowproof
Winter I cept RS3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
WR Snowproof
Winter I cept RS3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
WR Snowproof
Winter I cept RS3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the WR Snowproof 79% from 4 reviews and the Winter I cept RS3 77% from 28. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | WR Snowproof | Gap | Winter I cept RS3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry WR Snowproof ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 43.8 | 2.2% | 44.8 |
| Wet Winter I cept RS3 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 41 | 16.6% | 34.2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 71.1 | 10.7% | 78.7 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.7 | 14.8% | 3.1 |
| Snow Winter I cept RS3 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 10.3 | 7.8% | 9.5 |
| Snow Traction N | 229.6 | 9.4% | 251.1 |
| Ice Winter I cept RS3 ahead | |||
| Ice Braking m | 20.8 | 1.9% | 20.4 |
| Comfort Winter I cept RS3 ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 72.1 | 0.4 dB | 71.7 |
| Value WR Snowproof ahead | |||
| Wear km | 44,700 | 2.2% | 45,700 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 3.4% | 5.8 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 68.1 | 8.1% | 74.1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WR Snowproof | Field | Winter I cept RS3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | P11 of 15 | P7 of 15 |
WR Snowproof vs Winter I cept RS3: your questions
Is the Nokian WR Snowproof or the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 the better tyre?
The Nokian WR Snowproof and the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 have met in one independent test so far, and the Winter I cept RS3 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WR Snowproof scores 8.8 and the Winter I cept RS3 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WR Snowproof or the Winter I cept RS3?
The Winter I cept RS3 led 3 of the 3 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The WR Snowproof led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter I cept RS3 led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.3/10 for the WR Snowproof and 6.7/10 for the Winter I cept RS3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the WR Snowproof 79% from 4 reviews and the Winter I cept RS3 77% from 28.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The WR Snowproof is made in 73 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Winter I cept RS3 in 46 (14 to 17 inch). 32 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the WR Snowproof is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter I cept RS3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
11-2 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Vredestein Wintrac
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
7-3 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.