Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 92% · 9
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 73% · 25
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. The Proxes Sport 2 had 15% lower rolling resistance; the Advan Sport V107 lasted 4.8% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 if you prioritize dry stopping power and sharper, faster dry-road dynamics. Choose the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 if you want a quieter, more comfortable and more energy-efficient UHP summer tyre with generally stronger aquaplaning resistance and very competitive wet braking.
Where the Proxes Sport 2 is stronger
- Lower rolling resistance/efficiency advantage across tests (e.g., 8.7 vs 10.0 kg/t; 8.26 vs 9.99 kg/t), which can reduce fuel/energy use
- Refinement: consistently lower measured noise (e.g., 71.3 dB vs 73.1 dB) and higher comfort scoring where measured (e.g., 7.1 vs 6.6 in Top Tyre Review 2026)
- Aquaplaning resistance often stronger, especially straight-ahead (wins in 3/4 straight-aqua comparisons) and solid curved-aqua results in multiple tests
Where the Advan Sport V107 is stronger
- Clear, repeatable dry braking superiority (wins 6/6; typically ~0.5-1.8% shorter stopping distances)
- Generally faster/more dynamic dry handling when measured (e.g., 29.8 s vs 31.3 s in 2026 Top Tyre Review), with strong steering feel commentary
- Often stronger objective wet-lap/handling pace in group tests even when wet braking is split (e.g., AutoBild 2026 wet circle 14.95 s vs 15.29 s; wet handling 82.0 vs 81.8 km/h)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Proxes Sport 2 vs Advan Sport V107 at a glance
| Category | Proxes Sport 2 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won6 shared tests | 3 | 3 | |
| Dry11 measurements | 0 | The Advan Sport V107 stopped 1.6% shorter in the dry (6 tests) | 10 |
| Wet20 measurements | 10 | Level between the two. | 10 |
| Comfort5 measurements | 4 | The Proxes Sport 2 was 1 dB quieter (3 tests) | 0 |
| Value9 measurements | 7 | The Proxes Sport 2 had 15% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 2 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.1/10 | The Proxes Sport 2 by 0.3 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating9 and 25 reviews | 92% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 19 points | 73% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 100% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 46 points | 54% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Advan Sport V107 was dearer in 2 of 3 | +1.4% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 113 | 80 sizes made in both | 137 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 6 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Proxes Sport 2 | Field | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | P5 of 7 | P7 of 7 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P17 of 20 | P13 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P16 of 50 | P18 of 50 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P11 of 18 | P6 of 18 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | P14 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P10 of 50 | P4 of 50 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Proxes Sport 2
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Proxes Sport 2
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Proxes Sport 2
Advan Sport V107
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Proxes Sport 2 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.17 | 1.6% | 34.62 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31.3 | 4.8% | 29.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 109.7 | 0.6% | 110.5 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.7% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34.48 | 1.3% | 34.12 | 3-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37.8 | 0.3% | 37.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30.9 | 0.3% | 31 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.8 | 0.9% | 78.5 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 10.1% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15.29 | 2.2% | 14.95 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 88.88 | 1.5% | 87.5 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.28 | 0.3% | 3.3 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.8% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.23 | 1 dB | 73.2 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35,940 | 4.8% | 37,843 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.52 | 15% | 10.03 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 1.8% | 5.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85.9 | 9.6% | 95 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,734 | 3.3% | 1,794 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Proxes Sport 2 scores 9.1 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
| Proxes Sport 2 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92 | Dry | 97 | ||
| 81 | Wet | 76 | ||
| 48 | Comfort | 14 | ||
| 14 | Value | 5 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Proxes Sport 2 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.4 | Dry Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 9.3 | Wet Grip | 7.4 | ||
| 9 | Road Feedback | 8.5 | ||
| 9.4 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 8.8 | Wear | 5.5 | ||
| 8.5 | Comfort | 6.3 | ||
Owners rate the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- 92%from 9 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 88,100 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 delivers standout performance for the price, with consistently strong dry and wet grip, high confidence at speed, and sharp, predictable handling/steering response. Many comparisons against premium competitors (Michelin/Goodyear/Continental/Bridgestone) describe the Toyo as matching or exceeding them in real-world traction and stability while offering excellent value. Wear/longevity feedback is generally very positive where reported, with several users noting robust tread life. A smaller number of drivers mention trade-offs such as limited rim-protection and a sport-tyre firmness (and occasional noise) depending on vehicle setup.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Sharp handling, steering response, and stability at speed
- Predictable behavior under hard braking/cornering
Summarised by AI from 9 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 9 Proxes Sport 2 reviewsI have had these tyres on my Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Quattro for a year and a half now and coming from an avid PS4S user I must say I'm shocked at how good these are for the money! They were about £70 per corner cheaper than the PS4S' for the TT in 255/35/19 so initially I was sceptical but I am amazing at the handling, dry AND wet grip they provide and the longevity of the tyres! I have covered a good mix of country roads, motorways and long trips across Europe in the year and a half I have had these on and they have never missed a beat! I'm so confident in the wet, even when driving very "spiritedly"! Granted they aren't as comfortable as a BluEarth GT AE51 for example but the car is lowered on coil overs so its not all the tyres fault. 10/10 would defiantly purchase again and recommend to others.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- 73%from 25 reviews
- 54%would buy again
- 140,521 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners most consistently praise the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 for strong dry performance, with around three in five highlighting excellent dry grip and many also noting sharp steering and confident dry handling. Wet grip is generally rated as decent, though opinions are more mixed, with a small but notable group (around one in seven) finding it weaker, particularly in colder conditions. The biggest drawback is longevity: around two in five owners complain of very fast wear. Noise is another frequent issue, with around one in three reporting higher road roar, especially on rougher surfaces.
- Outstanding dry grip and confidence under power
- Very capable dry handling with strong feedback
- Direct, responsive steering feel
- Stiff, sporty sidewalls that support hard driving
- Very short tread life and rapid wear
- Noticeable road noise/roar, especially on coarse surfaces
- Needs heat or a bedding-in period to feel at its best
Summarised by AI from 24 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 25 Advan Sport V107 reviewsAmazing feel and handling, decent dry grip.
Awful comfort and wear rate.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 113 sizes of the Proxes Sport 2 and 137 of the Advan Sport V107, 80 of them made in both.
| Category | Proxes Sport 2 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 113 sizes, 17 to 22 inch | 137 sizes, 16 to 24 inch |
| Made in both | 80 sizes 225/40 R18225/45 R18235/40 R18235/45 R18245/35 R18245/40 R18245/45 R18255/35 R18255/40 R18255/45 R18265/35 R18275/40 R18and 68 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A100% | A94%B6% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C72%D28% | D71%C22%A7% |
| EU label noise | 71-72 dB B80%A20% | 66-73 dB B76%A24% |
| On the market since | - | 2018 |
| Replaced | - | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 (2010) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Advan Sport V107 was the dearer tyre in 2 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 1.4% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 sit in the same modern “UHP summer” bracket, but the shared test data shows they chase performance in noticeably different ways. Across six overlapping comparisons (18-19 inch fitments, multiple test organizations), the Yokohama repeatedly leans toward outright grip and precision-especially when braking and pushing on in the dry-while the Toyo aims for a calmer, more efficient, more comfortable everyday UHP balance.
What makes this head-to-head interesting is that their strengths don't perfectly overlap: the V107 is consistently strong on dry stopping and tends to feel quicker when driven hard, yet it's repeatedly penalized on efficiency/refinement metrics (rolling resistance, comfort/noise) in the same group tests. The Proxes Sport 2 rarely tops the “sportiness” charts, but it posts frequent wins in rolling resistance, noise and aquaplaning resistance-traits that matter every day, especially for high-mileage or EV/plug-in drivers.
Conclusion
If your priority is maximum dry-road performance, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is the more convincing enthusiast choice in this dataset. It wins dry braking in all 6 shared results (typically ~0.5-1.8% shorter, e.g., 34.1 m vs 34.6 m in multiple 245/45 R19 tests, and 37.7 m vs 38.2 m in 225/45 R18), and it is generally quicker in dry handling when measured (for example 29.8 s vs 31.3 s in the 2026 Top Tyre Review test). That advantage helps explain why ADAC rated its dry behavior “very good” and why it often reads as the sharper, faster tyre.
If you want a more rounded UHP tyre for real-world use-especially where cabin refinement, efficiency and high-speed water stability matter-the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 makes the stronger case. It consistently beats the V107 on rolling resistance (e.g., 8.7 vs 10.0 kg/t; 8.26 vs 9.99 kg/t), is repeatedly quieter (e.g., 71.3 dB vs 73.1 dB), and frequently leads straight/curved aquaplaning metrics (e.g., 94.9 vs 93 km/h straight aqua in AutoBild 2026; 78.0 vs 75.9 km/h in ADAC 2025). Wet braking is split (3 wins each), meaning the decision is less about “wet grip” overall and more about whether you value the Yokohama's dry sharpness or the Toyo's day-to-day comfort/efficiency. Practical takeaway: V107 for drivers chasing dry-road bite and response; Proxes Sport 2 for drivers who want a quieter, lower-consumption UHP with strong aquaplaning resilience.
Proxes Sport 2 vs Advan Sport V107: your questions
Is the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 or the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 the better tyre?
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 have met in 6 independent tests and the record is level at 3-3. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Proxes Sport 2 scores 9.1 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Proxes Sport 2 or the Advan Sport V107?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 10-10 between the Proxes Sport 2 and the Advan Sport V107.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 10 of the 11 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.6% shorter in the dry across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Proxes Sport 2 had 15% lower rolling resistance (3 tests); the Advan Sport V107 lasted 4.8% longer in the wear tests (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.8/10 for the Proxes Sport 2 and 5.5/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Proxes Sport 2 was 1 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2 and 6.3/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. 100% of Proxes Sport 2 owners would buy it again, against 54% for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Advan Sport V107 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 1.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Proxes Sport 2 is made in 113 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Advan Sport V107 in 137 (16 to 24 inch). 80 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Proxes Sport 2 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Advan Sport V107 A and D.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-1 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion