Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The data show a clear split in strengths: Goodyear dominates wet safety (shortest wet braking in every test, strong aquaplaning resistance) and longevity, whereas Kleber repeatedly tops snow-specific metrics (shortest snow braking, excellent traction and slalom). Drivers choosing between them are effectively choosing between a rain-leaning all-rounder and a snow-biased specialist.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | seven |
While it might look like the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better than the Kleber Krisalp HP3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet braking and handling (e.g., 31.7 m vs 35.0 m at ADAC, +9.4%)
- High aquaplaning resistance and wet circle grip
- Excellent longevity and low abrasion (often +14-45% mileage advantage)
- Balanced all-round winter performance with low noise and good comfort
- Top-tier snow performance (shortest snow braking in all shared tests)
- Strong snow traction and control in snow handling/slalom
- Good straight-line aquaplaning and generally low rolling resistance/fuel use
- Quiet rolling and stable, predictable behavior on snow and ice
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.45% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was 0.74% faster around a lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped the vehicle in 5.72% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped the vehicle in 10.07% less distance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was 3.32% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had 13.33% higher lateral wet grip than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 floated at a 0.94% higher speed than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 slipped out at a 2.77% higher speed than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during seven snow braking tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 stopped the vehicle in 2.64% less distance than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Snow Braking: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had 1.63% better snow traction than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was 0.29% faster around a lap than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was 3.12% faster through a slalom than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Snow Slalom: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped the vehicle 0.6% shorter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Ice Braking: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 scored 8.22% more points than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during three noise tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 measured 0.85% quieter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Noise: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during four wear tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is predicted to cover 22.07% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Wear: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during two value tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 proved to have a 0.25% better value based on price/1000km than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Value: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had a 1.15% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Kleber Krisalp HP3 used 1.72% less fuel than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Kleber Krisalp HP3
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 emitted 21.88% less particle wear matter than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Driver Reviews
Drivers rate the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 very highly, praising its excellent grip and braking on dry and wet roads, strong traction in snow, and a quiet, comfortable, and predictable ride. Handling is often described as stable and confidence-inspiring, with several noting good highway manners. A minority mention weaker performance on pure ice and a softer, less sporty steering feel at the limit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with only a few caveats.
Based on 13 reviews with an average rating of 87%
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tyre, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
Based on 36 reviews with an average rating of 84%
Conclusion
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 earns its place for drivers who face frequent, sustained snow. It repeatedly stops shorter and grips harder on snow, with precise control on snowy handling courses. The trade-offs are longer wet braking, earlier understeer in the wet, and lower mileage. If you live in mountainous or reliably snowy regions and prioritize maximum snow security, the Kleber's focused capability makes sense; for mixed or rain-dominant winters, Goodyear is the clear choice.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Goodyear is consistently ~3-10% better in wet braking and faster in wet handling; Kleber tends to understeer in the wet.
- Snow specialization: Kleber repeatedly wins snow braking/traction/handling; Goodyear is solid but not the snow benchmark.
- Mileage: Goodyear projects much higher wear life (e.g., 76,500 km vs 52,700 km at ADAC).
- Aquaplaning split: Kleber often edges straight-line aquaplaning; Goodyear leads curved aquaplaning and wet circle grip.
- Efficiency: Kleber usually shows slightly lower rolling resistance/fuel consumption; Goodyear can be higher RR in some tests.
- Price/value context: Goodyear is pricier but offsets with wet safety and longevity; Kleber can be cheaper per set but gives up wet performance and wear.
Overall Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.