Menu

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs GT Radial ClimateActive

All Season Passenger Car 4 shared tests
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
TR Score
9.4/10
Owners say
82% · 81
Head to head 4-0 wins in 4 shared tests 2024-2026 · 3 publications
GT Radial ClimateActive
TR Score
9.1/10
Owners say
87% · 4

In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 4 times and the ClimateActive not once. The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 lasted 14.1% longer in the wear tests; the ClimateActive stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry.

Data updated

Which should you buy?

Choose the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 if you face real winter conditions or prioritize wet/winter safety and longer tread life; choose the GT Radial ClimateActive if you drive mostly in mild climates and want strong dry braking and better upfront value/efficiency, accepting weaker winter performance and (in some tests) faster wear.

Where the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is stronger

  • Consistently shorter wet braking across all shared tests (wins 4/4; e.g., 34.2 m vs 35.4 m in ADAC; 55.2 m vs 56.6 m in AutoBild 225/50 R17)
  • Stronger winter performance, especially traction and snow/ice stopping (e.g., ADAC snow traction 2547 N vs 2388 N; ADAC ice braking 20.3 m vs 20.9 m)
  • Better longevity and wear indicators in the shared data (e.g., ADAC 43,200 km vs 35,300 km; lower abrasion 63 vs 75 mg/km/t)
Everything on the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

Where the ClimateActive is stronger

  • Best-in-pair dry braking in every shared comparison (wins 4/4; e.g., 42.4 m vs 44.4 m in ADAC; 40.1 m vs 41.2 m in AutoBild SUV)
  • Often competitive on efficiency/value metrics (e.g., ADAC fuel consumption 5.6 vs 5.7 l/100 km; AutoBild value metric 12.00 vs 12.79)
  • Capable straight-line aquaplaning resistance in multiple tests (e.g., ADAC 87.3 km/h vs 86.5 km/h; AutoBild SUV 74.6 km/h vs 73.0 km/h)
Everything on the ClimateActive

The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.

Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs ClimateActive at a glance

Category Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Gap ClimateActive
Shared tests won4 shared tests 4 0
Dry6 measurements 1 The ClimateActive stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry (4 tests) 5
Wet15 measurements 10 The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped 2.4% shorter in the wet (4 tests) 5
Snow10 measurements 8 The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped 2% shorter on snow (3 tests) 2
Ice1 measurement 1 0
Comfort4 measurements 3 1
Value8 measurements 6 The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 lasted 14.1% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) 2
Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold 9.4/10 The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 by 0.3 9.1/10
Owner rating81 and 4 reviews 82% The ClimateActive by 5 points 87%
Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices +39.8% The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was dearer in 3 of 3 Cheaper
Sizes madeEU label registrations 102 66 sizes made in both 88

Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.

Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2026

Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Field ClimateActive
2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC · 2026 · 185/65 R15 P6 of 16 P8 of 16
2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad · 2025 · 215/55 R17 · VW T-Roc P5 of 11 P6 of 11
2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild · 2024 · 225/50 R17 P4 of 15 P9 of 15
2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild · 2024 · 225/50 R17 P6 of 37 P8 of 37

Performance profile

15 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.

Dry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingSnow SlalomNoiseWearRolling ResistanceFuel Consumption

Where each is furthest ahead

Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

ClimateActive

Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.

In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.

Every measurement, side by side

Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.

Measurement Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Gap ClimateActive Wins
42.15 2.5% 41.08 0-4
93.15 0.1% 93.2 1-1
51.48 2.4% 52.7 4-0
39 4.6% 40.9 1-0
76.95 = 76.85 1-1
14.04 0.3% 14.01 1-1
77.97 0.2% 78.17 1-2
3.17 2.6% 3.11 2-1
19.33 2% 19.6 2-1
2,913 4.4% 2,790 3-0
78.7 3.8% 75.7 2-0
3.89 2.6% 3.99 1-1
20.3 2.9% 20.9 1-0
scored 14.3% scored 1-0
71.5 0.4 dB 71.93 2-1
44,280 14.1% 39,100 2-0
7.63 0.7% 7.68 1-1
5.31 0.8% 5.26 1-1
63 16% 75 1-0
612 29.7% 871 1-0

Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.

Scores beyond the shared tests

On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scores 9.4 and the ClimateActive 9.1 out of 10.

Tyre Reviews Score by category
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Category ClimateActive
65Dry 72
89Wet 81
68Comfort 46
73Value 30
81Snow 72
87Ice 76

Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.

What owners say

What owners rate
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Category ClimateActive
8.3Dry Grip 9.3
8.7Wet Grip 9
7.8Road Feedback 7.3
8Handling 7.8
8.6Wear 9
8.3Comfort 9.8
8.4Snow Grip 7.5
7.5Ice Grip 7

Owners rate the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81 reviews and the ClimateActive 87% from 4. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

  • 82%from 81 reviews
  • 78%would buy again
  • 1,078,534 milesdriven by reviewers

Owners rate the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 highly overall (average 79.9%), with most praising its dependable all-round grip, particularly in the wet, where over half of reviewers comment positively. Dry grip, snow traction and cold-weather performance are also frequently highlighted, and around a third of owners report strong tread life. The main recurring downsides are a noticeably weaker dry braking performance and slightly vague steering feel, raised by around one in five and around one in six owners respectively, while road noise feedback is mixed but leans positive.

  • Confident wet grip in heavy rain and greasy conditions
  • Strong dry grip for everyday driving
  • Long tread life and slow wear rates
  • Impressive snow traction for an all-season tyre
  • Longer dry braking distances / less bite under heavy braking
  • Vague or light steering feel and less direct response
  • Higher rolling resistance / noticeable fuel economy drop for some drivers

Summarised by AI from 75 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.

Almost perfect tyres that even didn't let my down in heavy snow which really amazed me. And driven normally they seem to last forever.

89% Hyundai Ioniq 225/45 R17 50,000 miles October 18, 2026
All 81 Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 reviews

GT Radial ClimateActive

  • 87%from 4 reviews
  • 25,500 milesdriven by reviewers

Drivers report the GT Radial ClimateActive delivers strong all-season performance, with confident grip in dry and heavy rain and notably good traction in mud and gravel. Comfort and refinement are frequently praised, and multiple users highlight strong value versus premium alternatives like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Wear so far appears competitive based on early mileage reports, with only a minority noting slightly vague steering/less road feedback.

  • Strong wet and dry grip with confident all-year performance
  • Good traction on mud/gravel (useful for fields and rougher surfaces)
  • Comfortable ride and generally quiet/refined driving
  • Good value for money versus premium competitors
  • Steering/handling can feel a bit vague or have reduced road feedback

Summarised by AI from 4 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.

I fitted this tyre on a new Fiat 600 hybrid, straight at car delivery, replacing the OE summer Goodyear's. I therefore have no benchmark compared to the summer OE's.
Fitted in early December, i had the chance to drive them on dry, wet and also some snow due to latest weather conditions.
the tyre was superb in all levels of grip. it is also very quiet and comfortable, despite the 18 inch and (relative) low aspect ratio.
Handling is soft and with delayed response, but i attribute this more to the car overall soft suspensions and chassis settings, rather than the tyre itself.
A very good tyre at a fantastic price point. And apparently the press agrees with me.
Well done GT!
83% Fiat 1.2 16V 215/55 R18 2,500 miles February 16, 2026
All 4 ClimateActive reviews

Sizes, EU label and lineage

From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 102 sizes of the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 88 of the ClimateActive, 66 of them made in both.

Category Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ClimateActive
Season All Season All Season
Sizes made 102 sizes, 14 to 22 inch 88 sizes, 15 to 22 inch
Made in both 66 sizes 175/65 R15185/55 R15185/65 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15195/45 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16and 54 more
EU label wet grip B87%C13% A84%B16%
EU label rolling resistance C47%B29%A21%D4% C53%B41%D5%
EU label noise 69-73 dB B99%A1% 69-73 dB B96%A4%
Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes 252 of 252 187 of 187
On the market since - 2024
Replaced Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 (2021) -
Replaced by Goodyear Vector All Season 4 -
Awards Commended: Best All-Season Tyres (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2024) Winner: All-Season Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2021) Winner: Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2021) Winner: All-Season Value Performer of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27)
Price in the shared tests The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the dearer tyre in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 39.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable.

Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.

Reading the results

Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.

Goodyear's Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and GT Radial's ClimateActive sit in a similar “touring all-season” brief, but the shared test data shows they chase that goal from different directions. Across four overlapping comparisons (ADAC 2026 in 185/65 R15 and multiple AutoBild datasets in 225/50 R17 plus an AutoBild SUV test), Goodyear tends to behave like a winter-leaning all-season that protects you when temperatures drop, while the GT Radial reads more like a value-focused, mild-climate all-rounder.

The headline pattern is consistent: GT Radial repeatedly wins dry braking (4/4 shared instances), while Goodyear repeatedly wins wet braking (4/4) and generally leads the winter metrics (snow traction and often snow/ice braking), plus it tends to last longer. That creates a clear buyer split: do you want a safer-feeling tyre in wet/cold and better longevity, or do you prioritize short dry stops and purchase value/efficiency?

Conclusion

Looking across the shared tests, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is the more rounded “true all-conditions” option-particularly if your all-season needs to function as a credible winter tyre. It consistently beats the ClimateActive in wet braking (e.g., ADAC 34.2 m vs 35.4 m; AutoBild SUV 61.3 m vs 62.2 m; AutoBild 55.2 m vs 56.6 m), and it shows a recurring advantage in winter traction and control (e.g., ADAC snow traction 2547 N vs 2388 N; AutoBild SUV snow handling 102.7 km/h vs 98.5 km/h). It also tends to be the longer-life choice (ADAC predicted wear 43,200 km vs 35,300 km; AutoBild wear 45,360 km vs 42,900 km), which matters for total cost over ownership.

The ClimateActive's strongest, most repeatable counterpunch is dry stopping distance: it wins every shared dry-braking comparison (e.g., ADAC 42.4 m vs Goodyear 44.4 m; AutoBild SUV 40.1 m vs 41.2 m). It also frequently looks attractive on “value” and sometimes efficiency/aquaplaning metrics (e.g., ADAC straight aquaplaning 87.3 km/h vs 86.5 km/h and slightly lower fuel use 5.6 vs 5.7 l/100 km). The practical takeaway: Goodyear is the safer bet if you regularly see real winter weather and want stronger wet/winter confidence with better longevity, while GT Radial is best suited to milder climates and budget-minded buyers who prioritize dry braking and upfront value-accepting the trade-offs in winter capability and (in some tests) tread life.

Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs ClimateActive: your questions

Is the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 or the GT Radial ClimateActive the better tyre?

In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 4 times and the ClimateActive not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scores 9.4 and the ClimateActive 9.1 out of 10.

Which is better in the wet, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 or the ClimateActive?

The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 10 of the 15 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.

Which is better in the dry?

The ClimateActive led 5 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.

Which is better in snow?

The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 8 of the 10 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2% shorter on snow across 3 tests.

Which lasts longer and costs less to run?

The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 lasted 14.1% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.6/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 9/10 for the ClimateActive.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and 9.8/10 for the ClimateActive.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81 reviews and the ClimateActive 87% from 4.

Which is more expensive?

In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the dearer tyre in 3 of them, by 39.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.

Are they available in the same sizes?

The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is made in 102 sizes (14 to 22 inch) and the ClimateActive in 88 (15 to 22 inch). 66 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the ClimateActive A and C.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Review the ClimateActive

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.