Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Across three shared professional tests (ADAC 2023, Tyre Reviews 2022/23, Auto Zeitung 2022), the TS 870 consistently finished ahead, winning all three. The data shows a clear pattern: Continental dominates wet grip and aquaplaning resistance, is stronger in snow braking and traction, and delivers better efficiency and longevity-while Vredestein fights back with sharper dry stopping and a lower purchase price.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | three |
While it might look like the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is better than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet grip and aquaplaning resistance (up to +24% in curved aquaplaning)
- Consistently better snow braking and traction across all tests
- Lower rolling resistance and fuel use; strong predicted mileage
- Balanced, precise handling with high safety reserves on all surfaces
- Strong dry performance with short braking and fast handling
- Lower purchase price and good value per test euro
- Low noise and good efficiency scores in select tests
- Acceptable winter-road capability for milder climates
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.7% less distance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.21% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 scored 6.67% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 3.6% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 1.99% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 scored 10.37% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 floated at a 7.79% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 slipped out at a 17.33% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 4.4% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 accelerated 5.56% faster than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had 0.78% better snow traction than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 2.41% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 scored 11.3% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Vredestein Wintrac Pro performed equally well in ice braking tests.
Best In Ice Braking: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Vredestein Wintrac Pro performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two noise tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 measured 1.58% quieter than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Noise: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one noise tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro measured 0.43% quieter than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is predicted to cover 12.7% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Wear: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro proved to have a 6.02% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Value: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during three price tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro cost 19.07% less than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Price: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had a 9.84% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 used 1.72% less fuel than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro emitted 0.92% less particle wear matter than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 overwhelmingly praise its exceptional wet grip and braking, superb aquaplaning resistance, and confident dry-road handling for a winter tyre. Comfort and low noise are frequently highlighted, and many report strong traction in fresh or soft snow. A minority note that traction can be weaker on hard-packed snow or ice-particularly on steep hills or heavier vehicles-compared to expectations. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with most users feeling safe and confident in varied winter conditions.
Based on 22 reviews with an average rating of 84%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro Driver Reviews
Most drivers report the Vredestein Wintrac Pro delivers excellent wet and dry grip with confident handling and strong snow performance, often rivaling summer tyres for steering feel while remaining quiet and comfortable. A minority note weaknesses on ice and some increased rolling resistance/fuel use, with occasional soft sidewall feel on powerful cars; overall sentiment is strongly positive given high scores and frequent praise for wear and value.
Based on 29 reviews with an average rating of 87%
Conclusion
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro appeals to drivers prioritising dry-road feel and budget. It posts shorter dry braking in one test and competitive dry handling, is quiet, and usually costs around 18-20% less. However, its weaker aquaplaning performance and lower snow capability make it a compromise in harsher or wetter winters. If you regularly face mixed wet/snow conditions, choose the Continental. If your winters are mostly cold and dry with occasional light snow-and you value a keen price and sporty dry response-the Vredestein can still fit the brief.
Key Differences
- Continental wins all three overall tests; Vredestein finishes mid-pack (5th/6th).
- Wet braking advantage to Continental (e.g., 27.6 m vs 29.5 m; +6.4%).
- Aquaplaning resistance clearly favors Continental (straight +7-13%, curved up to +25%).
- Snow performance: Continental shorter braking and better traction in all tests.
- Rolling resistance: Continental lower (≈9-11% better in two tests).
- Price: Vredestein typically ~18-20% cheaper upfront.
Overall Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.