Menu

A newer edition of this test is out: 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17

Test source ADAC

2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test

Overall test winnerContinental WinterContact TS 870

Every year ADAC perform some of the most in depth tyre tests in the world, and this years 17 inch winter tyre test is no different.For 2023 ADAC have taken15 of the most popular winter tyres in 225/45 R17 and tested them in all the usual…

Tyres tested
15
Tested size
225/45 R17
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

15 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

+Precise and safe properties on dry roads, absolutely safe properties on wet roads, absolutely safe properties on winter roads, high predicted mileage.

−No particular weaknesses.

Read full verdict
2nd

Michelin Alpin 6

+Precise and safe properties at the limit on dry roads, overall still safe properties on wet roads, very high predicted mileage, low weight, low fuel consumption.

−Slight weaknesses in aquaplaning transverse behavior, slight weaknesses in wet handling.

Read full verdict
3rd

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+

+Safe driving characteristics on dry roads, still good properties on wet roads, very high predicted mileage, low abrasion, good efficiency.

−Slightly longer braking distances on wet roads.

4th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

+Precise and safe properties at the limit on dry roads, very safe on winter roads, very high predicted mileage, low weight, low fuel consumption.

−Slight weaknesses on wet roads.

Read full verdict
5th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

+Still good properties on winter roads, good predicted mileage, low abrasion, low fuel consumption.

−Weaknesses in driving comfort on dry roads and in behavior at the limit, slight weaknesses on wet roads.

Read full verdict
6th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

+Still safe properties on dry roads, still good performance on wet roads, very high predicted mileage, low abrasion.

−Slight weaknesses in precision on dry roads, slight weaknesses in wet handling, slight weaknesses on wintry roads.

Read full verdict
7th

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

+Safe properties on wet roads, safe properties on winter roads, low weight, low fuel consumption.

−Slight weaknesses in precision and behavior at the limit on dry roads.

Read full verdict
8th

Giti GitiWinterW2

+Safe properties on dry roads, good performance on wet roads.

−Slight weaknesses in precision on dry roads, slight weaknesses in wet handling, slight weaknesses on wintry roads, below average mileage, slightly higher abrasion.

Read full verdict
9th

Kumho Winter Craft WP52

+Good properties on winter roads, highest predicted mileage in the test, low abrasion, low fuel consumption.

−Weaknesses in driving comfort and behavior at the limit on dry roads, slight weaknesses on wet roads, very high tire weight.

Read full verdict
10th

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

+Overall safe properties on wet roads, high predicted mileage and low abrasion, low fuel consumption.

−Slight weaknesses in precision and behavior at the limit on dry roads, slight weaknesses in wet handling, higher tire weight.

Read full verdict
11th

Nokian WR Snowproof

+Good predicted mileage, low abrasion, low fuel consumption.

−Weaknesses in driving comfort and behavior at the limit on dry roads, weaknesses on wet roads, weaknesses on winter roads.

Read full verdict
12th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

+Good properties on wet roads, good properties on winter roads, high predicted mileage, low abrasion, low weight, low fuel consumption.

−Significant weaknesses in driving comfort and weaknesses in behavior at the limit on dry roads.

Read full verdict
13th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906

+Safe properties on wet roads, low fuel consumption.

−Weaknesses in precision and slight weaknesses in behavior at the limit on dry roads, weaknesses on winter roads, second lowest predicted mileage in the test, slightly increased abrasion, higher tire weight.

Read full verdict
14th

Sava Eskimo HP2

+Safe properties on winter roads, high predicted mileage, low abrasion, very low weight, lowest fuel consumption in the test.

−Weak in terms of precision on dry roads, weaknesses in driving behavior at the limit on dry roads, weaknesses on wet roads.

Read full verdict
15th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

+Safe properties on dry roads, best result on wet roads in the test, low fuel consumption.

−Weak on wintry roads, low predicted mileage, increased abrasions, above average weight.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

TyreContinental WinterContact TS 870Michelin Alpin 6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+Dunlop Winter Sport 5Vredestein Wintrac ProSemperit Speed Grip 5Hankook Winter I cept RS3Giti GitiWinterW2Kumho Winter Craft WP52Apollo Aspire XP WinterNokian WR SnowproofPirelli Cinturato Winter 2Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906Sava Eskimo HP2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Position1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th11th12th13th14th15th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry97.9%95.7%94.9%94%95.3%94.7%95.1%94%100%96.6%97.3%95.7%95.7%91.8%97.5%
Wet94.4%92.5%87.7%89.1%87.4%91.2%98.2%90.5%88.6%90.4%83.9%91.7%88.2%84.1%94.4%
Snow98.3%95.7%97.3%100%92.2%91.6%98.1%95.7%93.6%89.8%90.1%94.4%91.4%99.3%93.4%
Ice100%99%97%96.5%100%93.8%95.6%92.9%99%94.7%93.8%98.5%91.6%98%88.2%
Comfort98.5%97.3%97%95.4%98.1%97.5%98.9%99%100%95.7%98.3%97.9%96.7%93.8%96.2%
Value84.7%89.3%84.4%90.8%82.7%86.4%79.4%76.2%97.6%83.3%80.4%81.8%74.6%85.8%69.2%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Every year ADAC perform some of the most in depth tyre tests in the world, and this years 17 inch winter tyre test is no different.

For 2023 ADAC have taken15 of the most popular winter tyres in 225/45 R17 and tested them in all the usual tests, such as dry, wet and snow performance, but also put all 15 sets through ice braking, a real world road wear test, and measured particulate matter to tell you which tyre is best for the environment. 

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
30 → 0 km/h
Ice Braking
20 → 0 km/h

Before you get to the final results it's important to explain how the ADAC scoring system works, as if you go to the score weighting page for this test, the calculated results will look a little different from the actual ADAC results.

To calculate their final results, ADAC score based on the German school system scoring, which rates each tyre in each test from 1 (best) to 6 (worse), and each score can be broken down with a plus or minus (eg 3+.) How these score systems are bracketed is up to ADAC and is not made public so we can't be sure exactly how they reached their conclusion, however we do know that if a tyre performs very poorly in a certain category, it gets manually deranked and can't finish in a top position. This is why the Bridgestone finishes very low in the ADAC rating (deranked because of high wear), and why the Kumho is in a different spot

Value

Wear is naturally a very important metric, but we believe value (cost per 1,000 km driven) is even more important as low wearing tyres with high purchase prices are still an expensive choice for the consumer.

ADAC don't calculate value, so we have done so using their reported purchase price and projected wear. In this metric the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had a predicted tread life of 64,000 KM and a cost of €1.72 per 1000km. In contrast, Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had a tread life of 36,100 KM and a cost of €4.35 per 1000km. The nearly 28,000 KM difference in tread life and the €2.63 difference in cost per 1000km are worth keeping in mind when reading the rest of the test.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1.72 Price/1000 Best
2.28 Price/1000 +0.56 Price/1000
2.38 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000
2.39 Price/1000 +0.67 Price/1000
2.4 Price/1000 +0.68 Price/1000
2.79 Price/1000 +1.07 Price/1000
2.81 Price/1000 +1.09 Price/1000
2.83 Price/1000 +1.11 Price/1000
2.84 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
3.05 Price/1000 +1.33 Price/1000
3.22 Price/1000 +1.50 Price/1000
3.24 Price/1000 +1.52 Price/1000
4.35 Price/1000 +2.63 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 152.9% (2.63 Price/1000).

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
64,000 KM Best
61,500 KM -2,500 KM
61,000 KM -3,000 KM
55,900 KM -8,100 KM
55,400 KM -8,600 KM
54,400 KM -9,600 KM
52,800 KM -11,200 KM
50,800 KM -13,200 KM
48,800 KM -15,200 KM
48,800 KM -15,200 KM
45,700 KM -18,300 KM
44,700 KM -19,300 KM
40,600 KM -23,400 KM
38,600 KM -25,400 KM
36,100 KM -27,900 KM

The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (27,900 KM).

We can't talk about value without considering fuel consumption which ADAC tested on a vehicle, not on a machine. The Sava Eskimo HP2 and Dunlop Winter Sport 5 both recorded 5.5 litres per 100 km, while Michelin Alpin 6 was less efficient at 5.8 litres per 100 km. The 0.3-litre difference may seem small but can add up over time, affecting the total cost of ownership.

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.5 l/100km Best £0
5.5 l/100km Best £0
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion is becoming more and more important, which measures the wear of a tyre through the life and the weight of particles it ejects into the environment. This is a category Michelin always excels in, with a clear lead over the Kumho in second place. The fast wearing Bridgestone was almost twice as bad for the environment with the worse result on test.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
56 mg/km/t Best
58.8 mg/km/t +2.80 mg/km/t
64.7 mg/km/t +8.70 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
66.7 mg/km/t +10.70 mg/km/t
68.1 mg/km/t +12.10 mg/km/t
69.7 mg/km/t +13.70 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +15.00 mg/km/t
73.9 mg/km/t +17.90 mg/km/t
74.1 mg/km/t +18.10 mg/km/t
75.4 mg/km/t +19.40 mg/km/t
83.9 mg/km/t +27.90 mg/km/t
88.1 mg/km/t +32.10 mg/km/t
98.5 mg/km/t +42.50 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 75.9% (42.5 mg/km/t).

Dry

The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had the shortest dry braking distance at 42.6 meters, followed by Continental's WinterContact at 43.5 meters. Sava Eskimo HP2 lagged behind at 46.4 meters. The difference of nearly 4 meters between the best and worst performers can be significant in real-world scenarios, potentially affecting collision avoidance.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
42.6 m Best 0 km/h
43.5 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
43.7 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
43.8 m +1.20 m 22 km/h
44.1 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.7 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
44.8 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
44.9 m +2.30 m 29 km/h
45 m +2.40 m 30 km/h
45.3 m +2.70 m 32 km/h
45.3 m +2.70 m 32 km/h
46.4 m +3.80 m 37 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (3.8 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 37 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

Hankook Winter I cept RS3 led in wet braking with a distance of 34.2 meters. Sava Eskimo HP2 was at the bottom with 42.7 meters. The 8.5-meter difference between the two could be a matter of safety, especially on slippery roads.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
34.2 m Best 0 km/h
35.9 m +1.70 m 28 km/h
36.6 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
36.8 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
37.7 m +3.50 m 40 km/h
38 m +3.80 m 41 km/h
38.4 m +4.20 m 43 km/h
38.5 m +4.30 m 43 km/h
38.5 m +4.30 m 43 km/h
38.6 m +4.40 m 44 km/h
38.9 m +4.70 m 45 km/h
39.4 m +5.20 m 47 km/h
40.5 m +6.30 m 51 km/h
41 m +6.80 m 53 km/h
42.7 m +8.50 m 58 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (8.5 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Continental WinterContact TS870 had a significant lead in both straight and curved aquaplaning, with the Nokian Snowproof and Vredestein Wintrac Pro struggling in both.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
81.1 km/h Best
78.7 km/h -2.40 km/h
78.2 km/h -2.90 km/h
77.8 km/h -3.30 km/h
76.8 km/h -4.30 km/h
76.8 km/h -4.30 km/h
76.6 km/h -4.50 km/h
74.1 km/h -7.00 km/h
73.8 km/h -7.30 km/h
73.8 km/h -7.30 km/h
73.6 km/h -7.50 km/h
72.5 km/h -8.60 km/h
72.4 km/h -8.70 km/h
71.8 km/h -9.30 km/h
71.1 km/h -10.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (10 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.3 m/sec2 Best
3.2 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (0.6 m/sec2).

Snow

Dunlop Winter Sport 5 stopped at 9.4 meters in snow braking, while Apollo Aspire XP Winter recorded 10.5 meters.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
9.4 m Best 0 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.6 m +0.20 m 19 km/h
9.7 m +0.30 m 23 km/h
9.9 m +0.50 m 29 km/h
10 m +0.60 m 32 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.2 m +0.80 m 36 km/h
10.3 m +0.90 m 38 km/h
10.3 m +0.90 m 38 km/h
10.5 m +1.10 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (1.1 m). From 130 km/h, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Dunlop was back at the front for snow traction testing

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
258.2 N Best
257.3 N -0.90 N
252 N -6.20 N
251.3 N -6.90 N
251.1 N -7.10 N
249.7 N -8.50 N
249.7 N -8.50 N
243.8 N -14.40 N
242.8 N -15.40 N
237.1 N -21.10 N
236.4 N -21.80 N
236 N -22.20 N
232.8 N -25.40 N
232.5 N -25.70 N
229.6 N -28.60 N

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (28.6 N).

Ice

The Continental WinterContact TS870 drew with the Vredestein Wintrac Pro, having the best ice braking distances.

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
19.5 m Best 0 km/h
19.5 m Best 0 km/h
19.7 m +0.20 m 13 km/h
19.7 m +0.20 m 13 km/h
19.8 m +0.30 m 16 km/h
19.9 m +0.40 m 18 km/h
20.1 m +0.60 m 22 km/h
20.2 m +0.70 m 24 km/h
20.4 m +0.90 m 27 km/h
20.6 m +1.10 m 30 km/h
20.8 m +1.30 m 33 km/h
20.8 m +1.30 m 33 km/h
21 m +1.50 m 35 km/h
21.3 m +1.80 m 38 km/h
22.1 m +2.60 m 45 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (2.6 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

The Kumho WinterCraft WP52 had the quietest passby noise.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.9 dB Best
71.6 dB +0.70 dB
71.7 dB +0.80 dB
72 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.20 dB
72.3 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.50 dB
72.7 dB +1.80 dB
72.9 dB +2.00 dB
73.1 dB +2.20 dB
73.3 dB +2.40 dB
73.7 dB +2.80 dB
74.1 dB +3.20 dB
74.3 dB +3.40 dB
75.6 dB +4.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (4.7 dB).

Results

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

225/45 R17 91H
Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 tyre offers strong performance across the board. On dry roads, it provides good steering feedback, precision, and safety reserves, along with above-average braking. In wet conditions, it excels in all sub-criteria, including short braking distances and good aquaplaning behavior. On winter roads, it performs slightly above average in braking and traction, with good handling and large safety reserves. Environmentally, it has a very good predicted mileage, good wear, and scores well in efficiency due to its low weight and fuel consumption. Overall, it has a clearly good environmental performance.
Dry97.9%
Wet94.4%
Snow98.3%
Ice100%
Comfort98.5%
Value84.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1543.5 m+0.90 m
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1537.7 m+3.50 m
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1581.1 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 153.3 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 159.5 m+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 15252 N-6.20 N
Ice BrakingLower is better1st / 1519.5 mBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better4th / 1572 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 1555900 KM-8,100.00 KM
ValueLower is better10th / 152.99 Price/1000+1.27 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better4th / 1565.3 mg/km/t+9.30 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
167.00
2nd

Michelin Alpin 6

225/45 R17 91H
Michelin Alpin 6
The MICHELIN ALPIN 6 tyre performs well on dry roads, offering good steering feedback and safety reserves. It has an average braking distance but still secures a good rating. In wet conditions, it excels in braking but falls short in transverse aquaplaning and handling, requiring better force distribution for a higher rating. On winter roads, it performs slightly below average in braking but above average in traction, with good handling and ice braking. Environmentally, it stands out for its above-average predicted mileage, low wear, and impressive efficiency due to low tyre weight and fuel consumption. Overall, it has a strong environmental performance.
Dry95.7%
Wet92.5%
Snow95.7%
Ice99%
Comfort97.3%
Value89.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1544.5 m+1.90 m
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1536.8 m+2.60 m
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1577.8 km/h-3.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 152.9 m/sec2-0.40 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1510 m+0.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 15251.3 N-6.90 N
Ice BrakingLower is better3rd / 1519.7 m+0.20 m
NoiseLower is better9th / 1572.9 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 1561000 KM-3,000.00 KM
ValueLower is better6th / 152.79 Price/1000+1.07 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better12th / 155.8 l/100km+0.30 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better1st / 1556 mg/km/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
D/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
170.00
3rd

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+

225/45 R17 91H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
The GOODYEAR UltraGrip Performance+ tyre offers good steering feedback and safety reserves on dry roads, with an average braking distance earning it a good rating. On wet roads, it performs well in aquaplaning and handling, securing a good overall rating despite narrowly missing a good mark in braking distance. In winter conditions, it shows above-average performance in braking and traction, and excels in snow handling and ice braking. Environmentally, the tyre is rated well for its very good predicted mileage, good wear, and low fuel consumption, despite its above-average weight. Overall, it achieves a good environmental rating.
Dry94.9%
Wet87.7%
Snow97.3%
Ice97%
Comfort97%
Value84.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 1544.9 m+2.30 m
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 1540.5 m+6.30 m
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1574.1 km/h-7.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.1 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 159.6 m+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 15249.7 N-8.50 N
Ice BrakingLower is better7th / 1520.1 m+0.60 m
NoiseLower is better10th / 1573.1 dB+2.20 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 1554400 KM-9,600.00 KM
ValueLower is better12th / 153.05 Price/1000+1.33 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better3rd / 155.6 l/100km+0.10 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better6th / 1566.7 mg/km/t+10.70 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
166.00
4th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

225/45 R17 91H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
The DUNLOP WINTER SPORT 5 tyre provides good steering feedback and safety reserves during critical driving maneuvers. Its braking performance is rated as good. On wet roads, it performs well in aquaplaning but only achieves satisfactory results in braking and handling, lacking the precision for a higher rating. In winter conditions, it excels in braking, traction, and particularly in snow handling, where it receives a very good rating. Environmentally, the tyre performs well due to its high predicted mileage, low wear, low weight, and low fuel consumption, securing it a good overall rating.
Dry94%
Wet89.1%
Snow100%
Ice96.5%
Comfort95.4%
Value90.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 1545.3 m+2.70 m
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 1539.4 m+5.20 m
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1573.8 km/h-7.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.1 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 159.4 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 15258.2 NBest in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better8th / 1520.2 m+0.70 m
NoiseLower is better14th / 1574.3 dB+3.40 dB
WearHigher is better2nd / 1561500 KM-2,500.00 KM
ValueLower is better4th / 152.39 Price/1000+0.67 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better1st / 155.5 l/100kmBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better4th / 1565.3 mg/km/t+9.30 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/C/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
147.00
5th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

225/45 R17 91H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
The VREDESTEIN WINTRAC PRO tyre exhibits satisfactory steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring occasional corrections during turns and corners. It tends to oversteer during dynamic maneuvers, and its braking distance is average but rated as good. In wet conditions, it excels in braking but scores only satisfactory in aquaplaning and handling. While it offers sufficient safety reserves, it lacks the precision for a higher rating. On winter roads, it receives good ratings for braking on snow and ice, as well as for snow traction and handling, although it could improve in precision. Environmentally, the tyre performs well with good predicted mileage and wear. Despite its slightly above-average weight, its low fuel consumption earns it a good efficiency rating.
Dry95.3%
Wet87.4%
Snow92.2%
Ice100%
Comfort98.1%
Value82.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 1544.7 m+2.10 m
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1538.5 m+4.30 m
Straight AquaHigher is better14th / 1571.8 km/h-9.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.7 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1510.1 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 15236 N-22.20 N
Ice BrakingLower is better1st / 1519.5 mBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better6th / 1572.3 dB+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 1548800 KM-15,200.00 KM
ValueLower is better7th / 152.81 Price/1000+1.09 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better12th / 155.8 l/100km+0.30 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better3rd / 1564.7 mg/km/t+8.70 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
137.00
6th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

225/45 R17 91H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
The SEMPERIT SPEED-GRIP 5 tyre shows minor weaknesses in steering precision on dry roads but maintains good safety reserves and an average braking distance, earning it a good rating for dry conditions. On wet roads, it also secures a good rating for braking and aquaplaning but falls short in handling due to early tendencies to understeer. Its performance on winter roads is less than ideal, missing a good rating due to shortcomings in ice braking, snow traction, and handling. The tyre tends to understeer or oversteer early, affecting precise control. Environmentally, the tyre receives a good rating; its predicted mileage is very good and wear is also rated as good. Although it narrowly misses a good rating for weight, its low fuel consumption secures it a good efficiency rating.
Dry94.7%
Wet91.2%
Snow91.6%
Ice93.8%
Comfort97.5%
Value86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 1545 m+2.40 m
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1538.6 m+4.40 m
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1578.2 km/h-2.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.1 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1510.1 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better14th / 15232.5 N-25.70 N
Ice BrakingLower is better11th / 1520.8 m+1.30 m
NoiseLower is better8th / 1572.7 dB+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 1555400 KM-8,600.00 KM
ValueLower is better3rd / 152.38 Price/1000+0.66 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better8th / 1569.7 mg/km/t+13.70 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
132.00
7th

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

225/45 R17 91H
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 tyre exhibits minor weaknesses on dry roads, particularly in steering precision and driving safety, with a tendency to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. However, its braking distance is rated as good. On wet roads, the tyre performs well across all metrics, including precise handling and good safety reserves. It also ranks third in winter road performance, excelling in braking and acceleration on snow and offering precise and safe handling. Its ice braking performance is average. Environmentally, the tyre scores well with good predicted mileage and wear. Its efficiency is also commendable due to its low weight and fuel consumption.
Dry95.1%
Wet98.2%
Snow98.1%
Ice95.6%
Comfort98.9%
Value79.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1544.8 m+2.20 m
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1534.2 mBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1578.7 km/h-2.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.1 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 159.5 m+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 15251.1 N-7.10 N
Ice BrakingLower is better9th / 1520.4 m+0.90 m
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1571.7 dB+0.80 dB
WearHigher is better11th / 1545700 KM-18,300.00 KM
ValueLower is better9th / 152.84 Price/1000+1.12 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better12th / 155.8 l/100km+0.30 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better11th / 1574.1 mg/km/t+18.10 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
130.00
8th

Giti GitiWinterW2

225/45 R17 91H
Giti GitiWinterW2
The Giti GitiWinter W2 tyre shows minor weaknesses in steering precision on dry roads but maintains good safety reserves and braking distance, earning it a good rating for dry conditions. On wet roads, it also secures a good rating for braking and aquaplaning but falls short in handling due to early tendencies to understeer. Its performance on winter roads is less than ideal, missing a good rating due to shortcomings in ice braking, snow traction, and handling. The tyre tends to understeer or oversteer early, affecting precise control. Environmentally, the tyre receives only a satisfactory rating; its predicted mileage and wear are below average. Despite good fuel consumption, its efficiency is compromised by its weight, also earning a satisfactory rating.
Dry94%
Wet90.5%
Snow95.7%
Ice92.9%
Comfort99%
Value76.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 1545.3 m+2.70 m
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 1538.9 m+4.70 m
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1576.8 km/h-4.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.1 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 159.7 m+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 15243.8 N-14.40 N
Ice BrakingLower is better13th / 1521 m+1.50 m
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1571.6 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 1540600 KM-23,400.00 KM
ValueLower is better8th / 152.83 Price/1000+1.11 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better14th / 1588.1 mg/km/t+32.10 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
115.00
9th

Kumho Winter Craft WP52

225/45 R17 91H
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 tyre provides only satisfactory steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring occasional corrections due to its elastic response. It tends to oversteer during dynamic maneuvers, but its above-average braking distance earns it a good grade. On wet roads, the tyre excels in braking and longitudinal aquaplaning but falls short in lateral aquaplaning and handling. On winter roads, it performs well, particularly in snow and ice braking, and offers good controllability in handling. However, it narrowly misses a good rating in snow traction. Environmentally, the tyre has the highest predicted mileage in the test and good abrasion ratings but falls short in efficiency due to its above-average weight, despite good fuel consumption.
Dry100%
Wet88.6%
Snow93.6%
Ice99%
Comfort100%
Value97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1542.6 mBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1538.4 m+4.20 m
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1573.8 km/h-7.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 152.8 m/sec2-0.50 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1510.1 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 15242.8 N-15.40 N
Ice BrakingLower is better3rd / 1519.7 m+0.20 m
NoiseLower is better1st / 1570.9 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better1st / 1564000 KMBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better1st / 151.72 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better2nd / 1558.8 mg/km/t+2.80 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
110.00
10th

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

225/45 R17 91H
Apollo Aspire XP Winter
The Apollo ASPIRE XP WINTER tyre shows minor weaknesses on dry roads, particularly in steering precision and driving safety, with a tendency to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. However, its braking distance is rated as good. On wet roads, the tyre performs well in braking and aquaplaning, but lacks precision in handling. Its performance on winter roads is satisfactory, doing well in snow braking but falling short in snow traction, ice braking, and snow handling. Handling is imprecise, with early tendencies to understeer or oversteer, although some reserves are available. Environmentally, the tyre narrowly misses a good rating; it has good predicted mileage and abrasion, but its efficiency is only satisfactory due to its above-average weight, despite good fuel consumption.
Dry96.6%
Wet90.4%
Snow89.8%
Ice94.7%
Comfort95.7%
Value83.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1544.1 m+1.50 m
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1538.5 m+4.30 m
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1576.6 km/h-4.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 153 m/sec2-0.30 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 1510.5 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 15232.8 N-25.40 N
Ice BrakingLower is better10th / 1520.6 m+1.10 m
NoiseLower is better13th / 1574.1 dB+3.20 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 1548800 KM-15,200.00 KM
ValueLower is better5th / 152.4 Price/1000+0.68 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better12th / 155.8 l/100km+0.30 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better9th / 1571 mg/km/t+15.00 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
117.00
11th

Nokian WR Snowproof

225/45 R17 91H
Nokian WR Snowproof
The Nokian Tyres WR Snowproof offers only satisfactory steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring occasional corrections due to its elastic response. It tends to oversteer during dynamic evasive maneuvers or lane changes, and its limit behavior is also rated as just satisfactory. However, its braking distance is slightly above average, earning it a good rating. On wet roads, the tyre's performance is unconvincing, resulting in an overall satisfactory rating. Whether in braking tests or aquaplaning behavior, its performance is below average. The tyre tends to understeer or oversteer early in corners, showing imprecision and limited reserves. Overall, its handling receives an insufficient rating. On winter roads, it also earns a satisfactory rating, although it secures a good note for snow braking. Its snow traction, ice braking, and snow handling are all rated as satisfactory. The vehicle's handling is not very precise, and it tends to understeer or oversteer early, offering limited reserves. Regarding environmental impact, the tyre receives a good rating for its predicted mileage and wear. Its efficiency is also rated as good, mainly due to low fuel consumption, although its weight receives a satisfactory rating.
Dry97.3%
Wet83.9%
Snow90.1%
Ice93.8%
Comfort98.3%
Value80.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1543.8 m+1.20 m
Wet BrakingLower is better14th / 1541 m+6.80 m
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 1571.1 km/h-10.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.7 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 1510.3 m+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better15th / 15229.6 N-28.60 N
Ice BrakingLower is better11th / 1520.8 m+1.30 m
NoiseLower is better5th / 1572.1 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 1544700 KM-19,300.00 KM
ValueLower is better13th / 153.22 Price/1000+1.50 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better3rd / 155.6 l/100km+0.10 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better7th / 1568.1 mg/km/t+12.10 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
144.00
12th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

225/45 R17 91H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
The PIRELLI CINTURATO WINTER 2 tyre exhibits clear weaknesses on dry roads, particularly in steering response and driving safety, with tendencies to oversteer and delayed stabilization. However, its braking distance is good. On wet roads, the tyre performs well in braking and aquaplaning but lacks precision in handling. Its performance on winter roads is good, particularly in braking on snow and ice, and it offers good controllability in handling. It narrowly misses a good rating in snow traction. Environmentally, the tyre scores well in predicted mileage, wear, and efficiency, with both its weight and fuel consumption at good levels.
Dry95.7%
Wet91.7%
Snow94.4%
Ice98.5%
Comfort97.9%
Value81.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1544.5 m+1.90 m
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1535.9 m+1.70 m
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1573.6 km/h-7.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.7 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 1510.2 m+0.80 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 15249.7 N-8.50 N
Ice BrakingLower is better5th / 1519.8 m+0.30 m
NoiseLower is better7th / 1572.4 dB+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 1552800 KM-11,200.00 KM
ValueLower is better10th / 152.99 Price/1000+1.27 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better10th / 1573.9 mg/km/t+17.90 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
158.00
13th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906

225/45 R17 91H
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
The YOKOHAMA BluEarth*WINTER V906 tyre has notable weaknesses on dry roads, including imprecise steering feedback and a tendency to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. Its braking distance, however, is rated as good. On wet roads, the tyre performs well in braking and handling but falls short in aquaplaning with a below-average rating. Its performance on winter roads is satisfactory; it does well in snow braking but struggles with traction, ice braking, and snow handling. Handling is imprecise, and the tyre tends to understeer or oversteer early, offering limited reserves. Environmentally, the tyre receives a good grade, but its predicted mileage and wear are only satisfactory.
Dry95.7%
Wet88.2%
Snow91.4%
Ice91.6%
Comfort96.7%
Value74.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1544.5 m+1.90 m
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 1538 m+3.80 m
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 1572.4 km/h-8.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.7 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 1510.3 m+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 15236.4 N-21.80 N
Ice BrakingLower is better14th / 1521.3 m+1.80 m
NoiseLower is better11th / 1573.3 dB+2.40 dB
WearHigher is better14th / 1538600 KM-25,400.00 KM
ValueLower is better14th / 153.24 Price/1000+1.52 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better13th / 1583.9 mg/km/t+27.90 mg/km/t
EU Label
D/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
125.00
14th

Sava Eskimo HP2

225/45 R17 91H
Sava Eskimo HP2
The Sava eskimo hp2 tyre exhibits only satisfactory performance on dry and wet roads, requiring frequent steering corrections and showing tendencies to oversteer during dynamic maneuvers. Its braking distance is below average. On wet roads, it performs well only in aquaplaning but is otherwise just satisfactory. Handling is also merely adequate, with early understeer and imprecise cornering. However, the tyre excels on winter roads, achieving above-average results in braking, acceleration, and snow handling. Environmentally, the eskimo hp2 performs well, with good predicted mileage and wear, and it ranks highest in efficiency due to low weight and fuel consumption.
Dry91.8%
Wet84.1%
Snow99.3%
Ice98%
Comfort93.8%
Value85.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 1546.4 m+3.80 m
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 1542.7 m+8.50 m
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 1572.5 km/h-8.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 153 m/sec2-0.30 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 159.5 m+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 15257.3 N-0.90 N
Ice BrakingLower is better6th / 1519.9 m+0.40 m
NoiseLower is better15th / 1575.6 dB+4.70 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 1550800 KM-13,200.00 KM
ValueLower is better2nd / 152.28 Price/1000+0.56 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better1st / 155.5 l/100kmBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better12th / 1575.4 mg/km/t+19.40 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/C/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
116.00
15th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

225/45 R17 91H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Dry97.5%
Wet94.4%
Snow93.4%
Ice88.2%
Comfort96.2%
Value69.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 1543.7 m+1.10 m
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1536.6 m+2.40 m
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1576.8 km/h-4.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 153.2 m/sec2-0.10 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 159.9 m+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 15237.1 N-21.10 N
Ice BrakingLower is better15th / 1522.1 m+2.60 m
NoiseLower is better12th / 1573.7 dB+2.80 dB
WearHigher is better15th / 1536100 KM-27,900.00 KM
ValueLower is better15th / 154.35 Price/1000+2.63 Price/1000
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 155.7 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better15th / 1598.5 mg/km/t+42.50 mg/km/t
EU Label
C/A/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
157.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.