Test Charts / ADAC
2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tyres tested
- 15
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +1.20 m | 22 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 44.9 m | +2.30 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 45.3 m | +2.70 m | 32 km/h | |
| 45.3 m | +2.70 m | 32 km/h | |
| 46.4 m | +3.80 m | 37 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (3.8 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 37 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.2 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +1.70 m | 28 km/h | |
| 36.6 m | +2.40 m | 33 km/h | |
| 36.8 m | +2.60 m | 35 km/h | |
| 37.7 m | +3.50 m | 40 km/h | |
| 38 m | +3.80 m | 41 km/h | |
| 38.4 m | +4.20 m | 43 km/h | |
| 38.5 m | +4.30 m | 43 km/h | |
| 38.5 m | +4.30 m | 43 km/h | |
| 38.6 m | +4.40 m | 44 km/h | |
| 38.9 m | +4.70 m | 45 km/h | |
| 39.4 m | +5.20 m | 47 km/h | |
| 40.5 m | +6.30 m | 51 km/h | |
| 41 m | +6.80 m | 53 km/h | |
| 42.7 m | +8.50 m | 58 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (8.5 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 81.1 km/h | Best | |
| 78.7 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 78.2 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 77.8 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 76.8 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 76.8 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 76.6 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 74.1 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -7.30 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -7.30 km/h | |
| 73.6 km/h | -7.50 km/h | |
| 72.5 km/h | -8.60 km/h | |
| 72.4 km/h | -8.70 km/h | |
| 71.8 km/h | -9.30 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -10.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (10 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3.1 m/sec2 | -0.20 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 2.8 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 | |
| 2.7 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (0.6 m/sec2).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.10 m | 13 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.10 m | 13 km/h | |
| 9.5 m | +0.10 m | 13 km/h | |
| 9.6 m | +0.20 m | 19 km/h | |
| 9.7 m | +0.30 m | 23 km/h | |
| 9.9 m | +0.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.70 m | 34 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.80 m | 36 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +0.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +0.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 10.5 m | +1.10 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (1.1 m). From 130 km/h, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 258.2 N | Best | |
| 257.3 N | -0.90 N | |
| 252 N | -6.20 N | |
| 251.3 N | -6.90 N | |
| 251.1 N | -7.10 N | |
| 249.7 N | -8.50 N | |
| 249.7 N | -8.50 N | |
| 243.8 N | -14.40 N | |
| 242.8 N | -15.40 N | |
| 237.1 N | -21.10 N | |
| 236.4 N | -21.80 N | |
| 236 N | -22.20 N | |
| 232.8 N | -25.40 N | |
| 232.5 N | -25.70 N | |
| 229.6 N | -28.60 N |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (28.6 N).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 19.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 19.7 m | +0.20 m | 13 km/h | |
| 19.7 m | +0.20 m | 13 km/h | |
| 19.8 m | +0.30 m | 16 km/h | |
| 19.9 m | +0.40 m | 18 km/h | |
| 20.1 m | +0.60 m | 22 km/h | |
| 20.2 m | +0.70 m | 24 km/h | |
| 20.4 m | +0.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 20.6 m | +1.10 m | 30 km/h | |
| 20.8 m | +1.30 m | 33 km/h | |
| 20.8 m | +1.30 m | 33 km/h | |
| 21 m | +1.50 m | 35 km/h | |
| 21.3 m | +1.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 22.1 m | +2.60 m | 45 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (2.6 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.9 dB | Best | |
| 71.6 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +3.20 dB | |
| 74.3 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 75.6 dB | +4.70 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (4.7 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64,000 KM | Best | |
| 61,500 KM | -2,500 KM | |
| 61,000 KM | -3,000 KM | |
| 55,900 KM | -8,100 KM | |
| 55,400 KM | -8,600 KM | |
| 54,400 KM | -9,600 KM | |
| 52,800 KM | -11,200 KM | |
| 50,800 KM | -13,200 KM | |
| 48,800 KM | -15,200 KM | |
| 48,800 KM | -15,200 KM | |
| 45,700 KM | -18,300 KM | |
| 44,700 KM | -19,300 KM | |
| 40,600 KM | -23,400 KM | |
| 38,600 KM | -25,400 KM | |
| 36,100 KM | -27,900 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (27,900 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72 Price/1000 | Best | |
| 2.28 Price/1000 | +0.56 Price/1000 | |
| 2.38 Price/1000 | +0.66 Price/1000 | |
| 2.39 Price/1000 | +0.67 Price/1000 | |
| 2.4 Price/1000 | +0.68 Price/1000 | |
| 2.79 Price/1000 | +1.07 Price/1000 | |
| 2.81 Price/1000 | +1.09 Price/1000 | |
| 2.83 Price/1000 | +1.11 Price/1000 | |
| 2.84 Price/1000 | +1.12 Price/1000 | |
| 2.99 Price/1000 | +1.27 Price/1000 | |
| 2.99 Price/1000 | +1.27 Price/1000 | |
| 3.05 Price/1000 | +1.33 Price/1000 | |
| 3.22 Price/1000 | +1.50 Price/1000 | |
| 3.24 Price/1000 | +1.52 Price/1000 | |
| 4.35 Price/1000 | +2.63 Price/1000 |
The difference between best and worst was 152.9% (2.63 Price/1000).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | £55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | £83 |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 56 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 58.8 mg/km/t | +2.80 mg/km/t | |
| 64.7 mg/km/t | +8.70 mg/km/t | |
| 65.3 mg/km/t | +9.30 mg/km/t | |
| 65.3 mg/km/t | +9.30 mg/km/t | |
| 66.7 mg/km/t | +10.70 mg/km/t | |
| 68.1 mg/km/t | +12.10 mg/km/t | |
| 69.7 mg/km/t | +13.70 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +15.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73.9 mg/km/t | +17.90 mg/km/t | |
| 74.1 mg/km/t | +18.10 mg/km/t | |
| 75.4 mg/km/t | +19.40 mg/km/t | |
| 83.9 mg/km/t | +27.90 mg/km/t | |
| 88.1 mg/km/t | +32.10 mg/km/t | |
| 98.5 mg/km/t | +42.50 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 75.9% (42.5 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 30 → 0 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 20 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
10 of these 15 tyres tested again
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tyres tested
10 of these 15 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
9 of these 15 tyres tested again

