Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tyres tested
15
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
42.6 m Best 0 km/h
43.5 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
43.7 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
43.8 m +1.20 m 22 km/h
44.1 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.5 m +1.90 m 27 km/h
44.7 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
44.8 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
44.9 m +2.30 m 29 km/h
45 m +2.40 m 30 km/h
45.3 m +2.70 m 32 km/h
45.3 m +2.70 m 32 km/h
46.4 m +3.80 m 37 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (3.8 m ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 37 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
34.2 m Best 0 km/h
35.9 m +1.70 m 28 km/h
36.6 m +2.40 m 33 km/h
36.8 m +2.60 m 35 km/h
37.7 m +3.50 m 40 km/h
38 m +3.80 m 41 km/h
38.4 m +4.20 m 43 km/h
38.5 m +4.30 m 43 km/h
38.5 m +4.30 m 43 km/h
38.6 m +4.40 m 44 km/h
38.9 m +4.70 m 45 km/h
39.4 m +5.20 m 47 km/h
40.5 m +6.30 m 51 km/h
41 m +6.80 m 53 km/h
42.7 m +8.50 m 58 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (8.5 m ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 58 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
81.1 km/h Best
78.7 km/h -2.40 km/h
78.2 km/h -2.90 km/h
77.8 km/h -3.30 km/h
76.8 km/h -4.30 km/h
76.8 km/h -4.30 km/h
76.6 km/h -4.50 km/h
74.1 km/h -7.00 km/h
73.8 km/h -7.30 km/h
73.8 km/h -7.30 km/h
73.6 km/h -7.50 km/h
72.5 km/h -8.60 km/h
72.4 km/h -8.70 km/h
71.8 km/h -9.30 km/h
71.1 km/h -10.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (10 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.3 m/sec2 Best
3.2 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.1 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
3 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.40 m/sec2
2.8 m/sec2 -0.50 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
2.7 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (0.6 m/sec2).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
9.4 m Best 0 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.5 m +0.10 m 13 km/h
9.6 m +0.20 m 19 km/h
9.7 m +0.30 m 23 km/h
9.9 m +0.50 m 29 km/h
10 m +0.60 m 32 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.1 m +0.70 m 34 km/h
10.2 m +0.80 m 36 km/h
10.3 m +0.90 m 38 km/h
10.3 m +0.90 m 38 km/h
10.5 m +1.10 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (1.1 m). From 130 km/h, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
258.2 N Best
257.3 N -0.90 N
252 N -6.20 N
251.3 N -6.90 N
251.1 N -7.10 N
249.7 N -8.50 N
249.7 N -8.50 N
243.8 N -14.40 N
242.8 N -15.40 N
237.1 N -21.10 N
236.4 N -21.80 N
236 N -22.20 N
232.8 N -25.40 N
232.5 N -25.70 N
229.6 N -28.60 N

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (28.6 N).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
19.5 m Best 0 km/h
19.5 m Best 0 km/h
19.7 m +0.20 m 13 km/h
19.7 m +0.20 m 13 km/h
19.8 m +0.30 m 16 km/h
19.9 m +0.40 m 18 km/h
20.1 m +0.60 m 22 km/h
20.2 m +0.70 m 24 km/h
20.4 m +0.90 m 27 km/h
20.6 m +1.10 m 30 km/h
20.8 m +1.30 m 33 km/h
20.8 m +1.30 m 33 km/h
21 m +1.50 m 35 km/h
21.3 m +1.80 m 38 km/h
22.1 m +2.60 m 45 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (2.6 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.9 dB Best
71.6 dB +0.70 dB
71.7 dB +0.80 dB
72 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.20 dB
72.3 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.50 dB
72.7 dB +1.80 dB
72.9 dB +2.00 dB
73.1 dB +2.20 dB
73.3 dB +2.40 dB
73.7 dB +2.80 dB
74.1 dB +3.20 dB
74.3 dB +3.40 dB
75.6 dB +4.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (4.7 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
64,000 KM Best
61,500 KM -2,500 KM
61,000 KM -3,000 KM
55,900 KM -8,100 KM
55,400 KM -8,600 KM
54,400 KM -9,600 KM
52,800 KM -11,200 KM
50,800 KM -13,200 KM
48,800 KM -15,200 KM
48,800 KM -15,200 KM
45,700 KM -18,300 KM
44,700 KM -19,300 KM
40,600 KM -23,400 KM
38,600 KM -25,400 KM
36,100 KM -27,900 KM

The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (27,900 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to best
1.72 Price/1000 Best
2.28 Price/1000 +0.56 Price/1000
2.38 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000
2.39 Price/1000 +0.67 Price/1000
2.4 Price/1000 +0.68 Price/1000
2.79 Price/1000 +1.07 Price/1000
2.81 Price/1000 +1.09 Price/1000
2.83 Price/1000 +1.11 Price/1000
2.84 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
3.05 Price/1000 +1.33 Price/1000
3.22 Price/1000 +1.50 Price/1000
3.24 Price/1000 +1.52 Price/1000
4.35 Price/1000 +2.63 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 152.9% (2.63 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.5 l/100km Best £0
5.5 l/100km Best £0
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km £28
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km £83

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 57 L (£83) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
56 mg/km/t Best
58.8 mg/km/t +2.80 mg/km/t
64.7 mg/km/t +8.70 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
66.7 mg/km/t +10.70 mg/km/t
68.1 mg/km/t +12.10 mg/km/t
69.7 mg/km/t +13.70 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +15.00 mg/km/t
73.9 mg/km/t +17.90 mg/km/t
74.1 mg/km/t +18.10 mg/km/t
75.4 mg/km/t +19.40 mg/km/t
83.9 mg/km/t +27.90 mg/km/t
88.1 mg/km/t +32.10 mg/km/t
98.5 mg/km/t +42.50 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 75.9% (42.5 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
30 → 0 km/h
Ice Braking
20 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.