Test Charts / TESTIRENKAAT
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tyres tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 9
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (80 - 5 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30.67 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 30.98 m | +0.31 m | 13 km/h | |
| 31.12 m | +0.45 m | 16 km/h | |
| 31.25 m | +0.58 m | 18 km/h | |
| 31.32 m | +0.65 m | 19 km/h | |
| 31.82 m | +1.15 m | 25 km/h | |
| 32.58 m | +1.91 m | 31 km/h | |
| 33.06 m | +2.39 m | 35 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (2.39 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Antares GRIP 60 ice would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Pirelli Ice Zero FR had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
2Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 5 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.53 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 33.62 m | +1.09 m | 23 km/h | |
| 36.13 m | +3.60 m | 41 km/h | |
| 38.49 m | +5.96 m | 51 km/h | |
| 40.88 m | +8.35 m | 59 km/h | |
| 41.06 m | +8.53 m | 59 km/h | |
| 41.98 m | +9.45 m | 62 km/h | |
| 43.16 m | +10.63 m | 65 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (10.63 m ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 would still be travelling at 65 km/h when the Sunfull SF W11 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.4 s | Best | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 41.4 s | +1.00 s | |
| 42.2 s | +1.80 s | |
| 42.7 s | +2.30 s | |
| 42.8 s | +2.40 s | |
| 44.9 s | +4.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (4.5 s).
Snow
3Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.28 m | Best | |
| 11.52 m | +0.24 m | |
| 11.56 m | +0.28 m | |
| 11.57 m | +0.29 m | |
| 11.99 m | +0.71 m | |
| 12.24 m | +0.96 m | |
| 12.24 m | +0.96 m | |
| 12.96 m | +1.68 m |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (1.68 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time (5 - 35 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.34 s | Best | |
| 4.39 s | +0.05 s | |
| 4.45 s | +0.11 s | |
| 4.47 s | +0.13 s | |
| 4.91 s | +0.57 s | |
| 5.16 s | +0.82 s | |
| 5.41 s | +1.07 s | |
| 5.44 s | +1.10 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (1.1 s).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 83.04 s | Best | |
| 83.28 s | +0.24 s | |
| 84.04 s | +1.00 s | |
| 85.19 s | +2.15 s | |
| 90.82 s | +7.78 s | |
| 91.69 s | +8.65 s | |
| 93.33 s | +10.29 s | |
| 93.73 s | +10.69 s |
The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (10.69 s).
Ice
3Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (25 - 5 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.75 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 15.02 m | +0.27 m | 17 km/h | |
| 15.25 m | +0.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 15.3 m | +0.55 m | 25 km/h | |
| 15.92 m | +1.17 m | 35 km/h | |
| 15.93 m | +1.18 m | 35 km/h | |
| 16.42 m | +1.67 m | 41 km/h | |
| 16.95 m | +2.20 m | 47 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (2.2 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60 would still be travelling at 47 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time (5 - 25 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.95 s | Best | |
| 6.39 s | +0.44 s | |
| 6.67 s | +0.72 s | |
| 6.68 s | +0.73 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 7.01 s | +1.06 s | |
| 7.71 s | +1.76 s |
The difference between best and worst was 29.6% (1.76 s).
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.76 s | Best | |
| 69.9 s | +0.14 s | |
| 71.21 s | +1.45 s | |
| 77.09 s | +7.33 s | |
| 81.25 s | +11.49 s | |
| 82.21 s | +12.45 s | |
| 83.04 s | +13.28 s | |
| 89.39 s | +19.63 s |
The difference between best and worst was 28.1% (19.63 s).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 80 → 5 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 5 km/h
- Snow Traction
- 5 → 35 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 25 → 5 km/h
- Ice Traction
- 5 → 25 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test
235/45 R1820 tyres tested
3 of these 8 tyres tested again
The Best Snow Tyres for 2025/26
205/55 R165 tyres tested
3 of these 8 tyres tested again
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test
205/55 R1614 tyres tested
3 of these 8 tyres tested again

