Charts 2023 Studless Vs Studded Snow Tyre Test

Below are all the data points for the 2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

Michelin X Ice Snow

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

Tigar Tigar Ice

Sunfull SF W11

Antares GRIP 60 ice

Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Ice Zero FR with a result of 30.67 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.2%.

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

30.67 M
Sunfull SF W11

30.98 M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

31.12 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

31.25 M
Tigar Tigar Ice

31.32 M
Michelin X Ice Snow

31.82 M
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

32.58 M
Antares GRIP 60 ice

33.06 M

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Sunfull SF W11 with a result of 32.53 M. The difference between best and worst was 24.6%.

Sunfull SF W11

32.53 M
Tigar Tigar Ice

33.62 M
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

36.13 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

38.49 M
Antares GRIP 60 ice

40.88 M
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

41.06 M
Michelin X Ice Snow

41.98 M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

43.16 M

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 with a result of 40.4 s. The difference between best and worst was 10%.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

40.4 s
Sunfull SF W11

40.8 s
Tigar Tigar Ice

40.8 s
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

41.4 s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

42.2 s
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

42.7 s
Michelin X Ice Snow

42.8 s
Antares GRIP 60 ice

44.9 s

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 with a result of 11.28 M. The difference between best and worst was 13%.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

11.28 M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

11.52 M
Michelin X Ice Snow

11.56 M
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

11.57 M
Antares GRIP 60 ice

11.99 M
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

12.24 M
Tigar Tigar Ice

12.24 M
Sunfull SF W11

12.96 M

Snow Traction (s)

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Ice Zero FR with a result of 4.34 s. The difference between best and worst was 20.2%.

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

4.34 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

4.39 s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

4.45 s
Michelin X Ice Snow

4.47 s
Tigar Tigar Ice

4.91 s
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

5.16 s
Sunfull SF W11

5.41 s
Antares GRIP 60 ice

5.44 s

Snow Handling (s)

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 with a result of 83.04 s. The difference between best and worst was 11.4%.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

83.04 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

83.28 s
Michelin X Ice Snow

84.04 s
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

85.19 s
Antares GRIP 60 ice

90.82 s
Tigar Tigar Ice

91.69 s
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

93.33 s
Sunfull SF W11

93.73 s

Ice Performance Overview

Ice Braking (M)

Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 with a result of 14.75 M. The difference between best and worst was 13%.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

14.75 M
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

15.02 M
Antares GRIP 60 ice

15.25 M
Michelin X Ice Snow

15.3 M
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

15.92 M
Sunfull SF W11

15.93 M
Tigar Tigar Ice

16.42 M
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

16.95 M

Ice Traction (s)

Ice acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Antares GRIP 60 ice with a result of 5.95 s. The difference between best and worst was 22.8%.

Antares GRIP 60 ice

5.95 s
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

6.39 s
Sunfull SF W11

6.67 s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

6.68 s
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

6.93 s
Tigar Tigar Ice

6.93 s
Michelin X Ice Snow

7.01 s
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

7.71 s

Ice Handling (s)

Ice handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 with a result of 69.76 s. The difference between best and worst was 22%.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

69.76 s
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

69.9 s
Michelin X Ice Snow

71.21 s
Pirelli Ice Zero FR

77.09 s
Antares GRIP 60 ice

81.25 s
Tigar Tigar Ice

82.21 s
Sunfull SF W11

83.04 s
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

89.39 s

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tyre	Score
	Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3	0%
2	Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5	0%
3	Michelin X Ice Snow	0%
4	Pirelli Ice Zero FR	0%
5	Tigar Tigar Ice	0%
6	Sunfull SF W11	0%
7	Antares GRIP 60 ice	0%
8	Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60	0%

Menu

2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tyre Test