Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tyres tested
- 12
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.20 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +1.40 m | 23 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 45.5 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45.6 m | +2.30 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45.7 m | +2.40 m | 30 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +2.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 46 m | +2.70 m | 31 km/h | |
| 46.5 m | +3.20 m | 34 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (3.2 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 35.4 m | +0.30 m | 12 km/h | |
| 35.5 m | +0.40 m | 14 km/h | |
| 35.9 m | +0.80 m | 19 km/h | |
| 36.1 m | +1.00 m | 22 km/h | |
| 36.4 m | +1.30 m | 25 km/h | |
| 36.9 m | +1.80 m | 29 km/h | |
| 37.1 m | +2.00 m | 30 km/h | |
| 37.2 m | +2.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 39.7 m | +4.60 m | 44 km/h | |
| 40.7 m | +5.60 m | 48 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 16% (5.6 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 48 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in meters (80 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38.5 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 39 m | +0.50 m | 15 km/h | |
| 39.1 m | +0.60 m | 16 km/h | |
| 39.2 m | +0.70 m | 17 km/h | |
| 40.2 m | +1.70 m | 27 km/h | |
| 40.3 m | +1.80 m | 27 km/h | |
| 41 m | +2.50 m | 32 km/h | |
| 41.7 m | +3.20 m | 36 km/h | |
| 42.1 m | +3.60 m | 38 km/h | |
| 42.3 m | +3.80 m | 39 km/h | |
| 44.3 m | +5.80 m | 47 km/h | |
| 46.6 m | +8.10 m | 54 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (8.1 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 54 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.4 km/h | Best | |
| 84 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 83.1 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 81 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 80.7 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 80.6 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
| 80.4 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 77.2 km/h | -7.20 km/h | |
| 76.5 km/h | -7.90 km/h | |
| 76.1 km/h | -8.30 km/h | |
| 69 km/h | -15.40 km/h | |
| 68.9 km/h | -15.50 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (15.5 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.6 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.6 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.6 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.6 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -0.50 m/sec2 | |
| 3 m/sec2 | -0.70 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.80 m/sec2 | |
| 2.4 m/sec2 | -1.30 m/sec2 | |
| 2.4 m/sec2 | -1.30 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 35.1% (1.3 m/sec2).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (30 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 9.9 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 10 m | +0.10 m | 13 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.1 m | +0.20 m | 18 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 10.2 m | +0.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +0.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 10.3 m | +0.40 m | 26 km/h | |
| 10.5 m | +0.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 11 m | +1.10 m | 41 km/h | |
| 11 m | +1.10 m | 41 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (1.1 m). From 130 km/h, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 would still be travelling at 41 km/h when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 236 N | Best | |
| 235 N | -1.00 N | |
| 235 N | -1.00 N | |
| 233 N | -3.00 N | |
| 233 N | -3.00 N | |
| 231 N | -5.00 N | |
| 231 N | -5.00 N | |
| 230 N | -6.00 N | |
| 229 N | -7.00 N | |
| 222 N | -14.00 N | |
| 216 N | -20.00 N | |
| 208 N | -28.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (28 N).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in meters (20 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 19.1 m | +0.80 m | 27 km/h | |
| 19.4 m | +1.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 19.4 m | +1.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 19.4 m | +1.10 m | 31 km/h | |
| 19.8 m | +1.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 20 m | +1.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 20 m | +1.70 m | 38 km/h | |
| 20.3 m | +2.00 m | 41 km/h | |
| 20.8 m | +2.50 m | 45 km/h | |
| 21.2 m | +2.90 m | 48 km/h | |
| 21.6 m | +3.30 m | 51 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 18% (3.3 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nokian Snowproof 2 would still be travelling at 51 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.4 dB | Best | |
| 70.9 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53,200 KM | Best | |
| 52,800 KM | -400 KM | |
| 49,100 KM | -4,100 KM | |
| 48,700 KM | -4,500 KM | |
| 47,000 KM | -6,200 KM | |
| 44,100 KM | -9,100 KM | |
| 43,800 KM | -9,400 KM | |
| 42,300 KM | -10,900 KM | |
| 38,500 KM | -14,700 KM | |
| 37,100 KM | -16,100 KM | |
| 34,000 KM | -19,200 KM | |
| 33,400 KM | -19,800 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (19,800 KM).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | £0 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | £28 |
All the tyres in the Fuel Consumption test finished less than 3% apart. Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Alpin 6 uses about 19 L (£28) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 48 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +11.00 mg/km/t | |
| 61 mg/km/t | +13.00 mg/km/t | |
| 62 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +23.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 79 mg/km/t | +31.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 64.6% (31 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 80 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 30 → 0 km/h
- Ice Braking
- 20 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
11 of these 12 tyres tested again
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
205/55 R1620 tyres tested
8 of these 12 tyres tested again
2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
185/65 R1516 tyres tested
6 of these 12 tyres tested again

